Value of 3D Printing for Comprehension of Liver Surgical Anatomy
1 other identifier
observational
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To our knowledge, it has not been analyze whether 3D printed liver model would improve the perception of a given liver tumor or the precision of operation planning in liver surgery. We design this prospective controlled trial to test whether the 3D-printed patient specific liver model could be more informative than standard MDCT (multi-row detector computed tomography ) and 3D visualization system in predicting the surgical anatomy of liver.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2018
CompletedJanuary 17, 2018
January 1, 2018
6 months
May 6, 2017
January 13, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcomes was the precise allocation of hepatic disease
For tumor allocation to the liver segments, 8 points were awarded if all segments were correctly identified in which the tumors resided. If the tumors was located in more than one segment, the 8 maximal achievable points were divided between these segments. Erroneously identified segments were awarded 0 point. Alternatively, the primary outcomes were also simply judged as right or wrong according to the final surgical results.
The primary outcome was assessed within 1 week after the collection of each participants' response.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Resection proposal of liver pathology
The secondary outcome was assessed within 1 week after the collection of each participants' response.
Time spent to judge tumor location
The secondary outcome was assessed within 1 week after the collection of each participants' response.
Study Arms (3)
MDCT group
The MDCT images of seven hepatic tumors were loaded on software to uniform study conditions, allowing both axial and coronal scans visualization.
3D visualization system group
The 3D virtual reconstructions of seven hepatic tumors were loaded on the visualization software which enables the rotation of the virtual model.
3D printing group
3D-printed models of seven hepatic tumors were created based on MDCT images, participants were allowed to freely handle them.
Interventions
Surgical residents were assigned to three different groups to evaluate different modes of patients' data. Residents were ask to state the liver segment in which the tumor resided and make a minimal resection proposal, including the tumor, the safety margin (1cm) and the dependent liver tissue. Residents were recommended to proceed in a classic way by resecting the whole liver segment. The time spent by each resident was also recorded in order to assess the quickness of comprehension and information transfer of the three different modes of presentation.
Eligibility Criteria
Medical students had to finish five year medical school education (including one year internship), and then went into at least 3 year training program for surgical residency. Those who had finished training of general surgery were the study population.
You may qualify if:
- Surgical residents
- Must had experiences with MDCT and 3D visualization system
You may not qualify if:
- Non surgical residents
- No experiences with MDCT or 3D visualization system
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
he Fifth People's Hospital of Dongguan City
Dongguan, Guangdong, China
Related Publications (6)
Marescaux J, Clement JM, Tassetti V, Koehl C, Cotin S, Russier Y, Mutter D, Delingette H, Ayache N. Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann Surg. 1998 Nov;228(5):627-34. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199811000-00001.
PMID: 9833800RESULTLamade W, Glombitza G, Fischer L, Chiu P, Cardenas CE Sr, Thorn M, Meinzer HP, Grenacher L, Bauer H, Lehnert T, Herfarth C. The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg. 2000 Nov;135(11):1256-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.11.1256.
PMID: 11074877RESULTZein NN, Hanouneh IA, Bishop PD, Samaan M, Eghtesad B, Quintini C, Miller C, Yerian L, Klatte R. Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2013 Dec;19(12):1304-10. doi: 10.1002/lt.23729. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
PMID: 23959637RESULTIgami T, Nakamura Y, Hirose T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Mizuno T, Mori K, Nagino M. Application of a three-dimensional print of a liver in hepatectomy for small tumors invisible by intraoperative ultrasonography: preliminary experience. World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3163-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2740-7.
PMID: 25145821RESULTKusaka M, Sugimoto M, Fukami N, Sasaki H, Takenaka M, Anraku T, Ito T, Kenmochi T, Shiroki R, Hoshinaga K. Initial experience with a tailor-made simulation and navigation program using a 3-D printer model of kidney transplantation surgery. Transplant Proc. 2015 Apr;47(3):596-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.12.045.
PMID: 25891694RESULTMarconi S, Pugliese L, Botti M, Peri A, Cavazzi E, Latteri S, Auricchio F, Pietrabissa A. Value of 3D printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4102-4110. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5457-5. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
PMID: 28281114RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tianyou Yang, MD
Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2017
First Posted
May 15, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 10, 2018
Study Completion
January 10, 2018
Last Updated
January 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01