Clinical Effects in Cervical Spinal Mobilization and Oscillation Mobilization in Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effects of spinal mobilization versus vertebral resonant oscillation (POLD) in patients with bilateral mechanical neck pain on pain sensitivity and neck pain intensity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 25, 2018
CompletedOctober 31, 2018
October 1, 2018
9 months
May 9, 2017
October 28, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in pain intensity before and after the intervention
A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of neck pain
Baseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Changes in disability before and after the intervention
Baseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session.
Study Arms (2)
Spine Mobilizations
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive spinal mobilizations in grades II to III of central posterior-anterior from cervical and thoracic spine as described Maitland in 2000.
Vertebral Resonant Oscillation (POLD method)
EXPERIMENTALThe vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to "neutral zone" to described by Panjabi 1992.
Interventions
Patients receive spinal mobilizations in grades II to III of central posterior-anterior from cervical and thoracic spine as described Maitland in 2000
The vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens ; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to "neutral zone" to described by Panjabi 1992.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- neck pain symptoms of mechanical nature
- age from 18 to 60 years
- bilateral symptoms
- symptoms for at least 3 month of duration
You may not qualify if:
- whiplash injury
- previous spine surgery
- diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
- having undergone any physical therapy intervention in the previous 6 month
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Madrid, 282922, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PT, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2017
First Posted
May 11, 2017
Study Start
May 10, 2017
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
October 25, 2018
Last Updated
October 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share