NCT02628470

Brief Summary

Currently, there are many studies about the effects of manual therapy on pain, but there are not enough studies to know what are the mechanisms that cause these effects. Although there is a research measuring neuromodulators substances after a cervical and dorsal manipulation, it has been done in healthy subjects and there is no information about mobilization. This work aims to select a sample with chronic neck pain, incorporating the cervical mobilization as a therapeutic approach to compare the effects of both techniques because not all patients accept the manipulation as a treatment technique (mobilization is much better tolerated) and to verify that the liberation of cortisol is not just caused by the stress on the joint manipulation and the psychological stress and expectation may be important. The hypothesis of this paper is that cervical manipulation and mobilization in subjects with chronic neck pain there will increase salivary cortisol levels. It is also expected a little increase in the expectation of being manipulated group because of the psychological stress. It is expected an improvement in the neck disability, pain and range of motion in the intervention groups immediately after and in the three groups the following week after the exercise. The main objective of the study is to measure and analyze changes in salivary cortisol concentrations after the intervention in the three groups. Secondary objectives is to analyze the changes in range of motion and disability caused by neck pain neck pain level

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2015

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 11, 2015

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 26, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

November 30, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 24, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Cervical pain, cervicalgia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • salivary cortisol

    For measuring salivary cortisol a Cortisol kit RE52611 ELISA® will be provided by the IBL laboratory. The saliva samples will be stored at -20 ° C until analysis, being coded by the researcher and measured by a blinded assessor. For this, it will be added 50 uL sample of saliva in the tubes of the kit with a pipette. Subsequently 100 uL of enzyme conjugate will be added to each tube, covering the plate with adhesive and shaking carefully. It will be incubated 2 hours at room temperature (18-25 ° C) in a centrifuge at 400-600 rpm. After removing the adhesive and remove excess of solution wil be added 100 uL of TMB solution. It wil be centrifuged for 30 min under the same conditions. At the end, they wil be added 100 uL of TMB solution inhibitory. The results wil be measured with a photometer at 450 nm within 15 minutes of adding the last reagent.

    Change from baseline cortisol concentration at after the intervention(immediately after)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Neck Disability

    Change from baseline disability at one week after intervention

  • Neck pain

    Change from baseline neck pain at one week after intervention

  • Tenderness

    Change from baseline pain threshold pressure at after the intervention (immediately after) and one week after

  • Cervical joint Range

    Change from baseline mobility at immediately after at one week after intervention

Study Arms (3)

group cervical manipulation

EXPERIMENTAL

The patient is supine without a pillow and physiotherapist standing in the ipsilateral corner of the hand of the thrust.

Procedure: cervical manipulation

Placebo group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants will receive a protocol of domiciliary cervical control exercises.

Procedure: cervical control exercises

Group cervical mobilization

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Oscillatory mobilization technique. With the patient in prone, the investigator applies an oscillatory motion in the most painful cervical segment for three minutes

Procedure: Oscillatory mobilization technique

Interventions

cervical high-velocity low-amplitude thrust manipulation

group cervical manipulation

Exercises of flexion, extension and rotation of the cervical spine

Placebo group

Joint mobilization technique type III according Maitland

Group cervical mobilization

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Manifest mechanical pain in the neck to the T1 vertebra as lower limit
  • Present the medical diagnosis of mechanical neck pain
  • Do not be getting any kind of hormonal therapy (including oral contraceptives)
  • Be over 18 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects that are associated with the adrenal gland pathology
  • Pathologies excess or defect of cortisol
  • Pathology severe psychological disorders related to anxiety, mood or stress
  • Participants pregnant due to changes in hormonal determinations
  • Contraindication to manipulation or mobilization

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Alcalá Universuty

Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28806, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Interventions

Manipulation, Spinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTherapeuticsRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Tomás Gallego-Izquierdo, Dr

    Alcalá University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. Pecos-Martin, D

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2015

First Posted

December 11, 2015

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2017

Study Completion

January 1, 2017

Last Updated

April 26, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Locations