NCT03148067

Brief Summary

Diaphyseal femoral and tibial fractures are in the spotlight within the traumatology-orthopedics scenario. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) remains the method of choice for treating these fractures, both open and closed ones. Occurrences of surgical site infection (SSI) related to this type of osteosynthesis are a challenge for all the professionals involved in patient healthcare. The reported incidence of SSI after IMN ranges from 0.9 to 17.5%. The majority of the data comes from retrospective studies and as part of case series descriptions, with little detail about the criteria used for defining and searching for cases of infection. Regarding the potential risk factors for this complication, previous use of external fixators, occurrence of open fractures and the severity of exposure according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification were indicated in a few retrospective studies as being possibly related to this complication. The objectives of the present observational cohort study are: 1. To determine the incidence of SSI related to IMN for fixation of diaphyseal femoral and tibial fractures in patients treated in a university traumatology and orthopedics reference hospital in São Paulo, Brazil; 2. To evaluate the risk factors related to the occurrence of this type of infection.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
225

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2015

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 3, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 3, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2017

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2017

Results QC Date

May 31, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 22, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Risk FactorsIncidenceEpidemiology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Relating to Intramedullary Nailing for Fixation of Diaphyseal Femoral and Tibial Fractures

    Patients who present signs of infection in the region of the surgery under evaluation or who describe alterations compatible with SSI, or whose records mention signs or symptoms compatible with the definitions of SSI, are considered to be cases with evolution to infection. Patients included in the study who, during routine or emergency care present a condition (according to the researchers' evaluation) suggestive of a SSI associated with intramedullary nailing are considered to be cases of infection

    one year after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Possible Risk Factors Related to Occurrence of SSI After Intramedullary Nailing

    one year after surgery

Study Arms (1)

Patients

Patients with closed or open diaphyseal femoral and tibial fractures treated through intramedullary nailing for fracture fixation

Procedure: Intramedullary nailing for fracture fixation

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients were included in the research after the surgical plan for intramedullary nailing for fixation of their fractures has been defined. This inclusion could occur up to 72 hours after the surgical procedure. If a patient presented more than one diaphyseal femoral or tibial fracture that could be potentially included in the study, only the first surgically corrected fracture were considered for analysis in the study.

You may qualify if:

  • Closed and open diaphyseal femoral and tibial fractures treated through IMN;
  • Age: 16 years or older
  • The patient or a person legally responsible for the patient should sign the free and informed consent statement (FICS) in order to take part in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (28)

  • Young S, Lie SA, Hallan G, Zirkle LG, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Risk factors for infection after 46,113 intramedullary nail operations in low- and middle-income countries. World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):349-55. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1817-4.

    PMID: 23052810BACKGROUND
  • Ozdemir B, Akesen B, Demirag B, Bilgen MS, Durak K. Long-term outcome of unreamed intramedullary nails in femur diaphyseal fractures. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012 Mar;18(2):147-52. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2012.19970.

    PMID: 22792821BACKGROUND
  • Pfeifer R, Sellei R, Pape HC. The biology of intramedullary reaming. Injury. 2010 Nov;41 Suppl 2:S4-8. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(10)70002-4.

    PMID: 21144926BACKGROUND
  • Petrisor B, Anderson S, Court-Brown CM. Infection after reamed intramedullary nailing of the tibia: a case series review. J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Aug;19(7):437-41. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000161542.93624.8d.

    PMID: 16056073BACKGROUND
  • Ricci WM, Gallagher B, Haidukewych GJ. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 May;17(5):296-305. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200905000-00004.

    PMID: 19411641BACKGROUND
  • Schmidt AH, Swiontkowski MF. Pathophysiology of infections after internal fixation of fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 Sep-Oct;8(5):285-91. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200009000-00002.

    PMID: 11029556BACKGROUND
  • Horan TC, Gaynes RP. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. In:Hospital epidemiology and infection control, 3rd ed., Mayhall CG, editor. Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2004:1659-702

    BACKGROUND
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. Atlanta, EUA: 2016. Available in: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Court-Brown CM, Christie J, McQueen MM. Closed intramedullary tibial nailing. Its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Jul;72(4):605-11. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380211.

    PMID: 2380211BACKGROUND
  • Alho A, Ekeland A, Stromsoe K, Folleras G, Thoresen BO. Locked intramedullary nailing for displaced tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Sep;72(5):805-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B5.2211761.

    PMID: 2211761BACKGROUND
  • Gaebler C, Berger U, Schandelmaier P, Greitbauer M, Schauwecker HH, Applegate B, Zych G, Vecsei V. Rates and odds ratios for complications in closed and open tibial fractures treated with unreamed, small diameter tibial nails: a multicenter analysis of 467 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Aug;15(6):415-23. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200108000-00006.

    PMID: 11514768BACKGROUND
  • Galvin JW, Dannenbaum JH 4th, Tubb CC, Poepping TP, Grassbaugh JA, Arrington ED. Infection Rate of Intramedullary Nailing in Closed Fractures of the Femoral Diaphysis After Temporizing External Fixation in an Austere Environment. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Sep;29(9):e316-20. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000327.

    PMID: 25785355BACKGROUND
  • Metsemakers WJ, Handojo K, Reynders P, Sermon A, Vanderschot P, Nijs S. Individual risk factors for deep infection and compromised fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a single centre experience of 480 patients. Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):740-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.018. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

    PMID: 25583638BACKGROUND
  • Roussignol X, Sigonney G, Potage D, Etienne M, Duparc F, Dujardin F. Secondary nailing after external fixation for tibial shaft fracture: risk factors for union and infection. A 55 case series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.10.017. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

    PMID: 25595427BACKGROUND
  • Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Apr;66(4):529-39.

    PMID: 6707031BACKGROUND
  • Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Quaba AA, Christie J. Locked intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Nov;73(6):959-64. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B6.1955445.

    PMID: 1955445BACKGROUND
  • Court-Brown CM, Keating JF, McQueen MM. Infection after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. Incidence and protocol for management. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Sep;74(5):770-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B5.1527132.

    PMID: 1527132BACKGROUND
  • Keating JF, Blachut PA, O'Brien PJ, Court-Brown CM. Reamed nailing of Gustilo grade-IIIB tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Nov;82(8):1113-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10566.

    PMID: 11132268BACKGROUND
  • Court-Brown CM. Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Feb;18(2):96-101. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200402000-00007. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14743029BACKGROUND
  • Halvorson JJ, Barnett M, Jackson B, Birkedal JP. Risk of septic knee following retrograde intramedullary nailing of open and closed femur fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012 Feb 17;7:7. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-7.

    PMID: 22340770BACKGROUND
  • Sie E, Kacou A, Traore A, Sery B, Lambin Y. Primary unreamed and unlocked intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Malays Orthop J. 2012 Nov;6(3):13-7. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1207.014.

    PMID: 25279049BACKGROUND
  • Salem KH. Unreamed intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fractures. Int Orthop. 2013 Oct;37(10):2009-15. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1998-y. Epub 2013 Jul 28.

    PMID: 23892464BACKGROUND
  • AO Foundation. AO/OTA Fracture and dislocation classification. Davos, Suíça: 2014. Available in: https://www.aofoundation.org/Structure/resource/AO-OTA-Fracture-Dislocation-Classification/Pages/AO-OTA-Fracture-Dislocation-Classification-Long-Bones.aspx

    BACKGROUND
  • Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):453-8.

    PMID: 773941BACKGROUND
  • Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma. 1984 Aug;24(8):742-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198408000-00009.

    PMID: 6471139BACKGROUND
  • Maragakis LL, Perl TM. Basics of surgical site infection surveillance and prevention. In: Practical Healthcare Epidemiology, 3rd ed., Lautenbach E, Woeltje KF, Malani PN, editor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010:173-185

    BACKGROUND
  • Oliveira PR, Carvalho VC, da Silva Felix C, de Paula AP, Santos-Silva J, Lima AL. The incidence and microbiological profile of surgical site infections following internal fixation of closed and open fractures. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016 Feb 2;51(4):396-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.09.012. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.

    PMID: 27517016BACKGROUND
  • Silva AGP, Silva FBA, Godoy-Santos AL, Luzo CAM, Sakaki MH, Zumiotti AV. Infecção pós-estabilização intramedular das fraturas diafisárias dos membros inferiores: Protocolo de tratamento. Acta Ortop Bras 2008;16:266-9

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Surgical Wound Infection

Interventions

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFracture Fixation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wound InfectionInfectionsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fracture Fixation, InternalOrthopedic ProceduresTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, Operative

Limitations and Caveats

Hyperglicemia was not measured.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Physician
Organization
University of Sao Paulo

Study Officials

  • Ana Lucia M Lima, MD, PhD

    Assistant Professor

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, MSc

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2017

First Posted

May 10, 2017

Study Start

September 15, 2015

Primary Completion

April 3, 2017

Study Completion

April 3, 2017

Last Updated

June 20, 2019

Results First Posted

June 20, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share