Comparison of Four Different Supplementary Foods in the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition
1 other identifier
interventional
2,691
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The research seeks to determine the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of alternative supplementary foods in the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) in normal program settings. The results of this study will guide decisions about what commodities to use in supplementary feeding programs in particular contexts and populations, and what factors need to be addressed to ensure maximum effectiveness in the treatment of moderate malnutrition. Tufts University, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation (MoHS), Project Peanut Butter, Caritas Bo, World Food Programme (WFP), and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) are collaborating to conduct an assessment of the effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of food aid commodities in treating moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) in young children. The study comparison is based on a targeted food delivery to children 6-59 months who are screened for MAM. Study participants will receive one of four approximately isoenergetic test foods:
- 1.Super Cereal Plus (SC+) with amylase
- 2.Corn-soy Blend Plus (CSB+) and fortified vegetable oil
- 3.Corn-soy Whey Blend (CSWB) and fortified vegetable oil (CSWB is a new product which is a modified version of CSB)
- 4.Ready-to-use Supplementary Food (RUSF, lipid-based)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 24, 2018
CompletedApril 18, 2019
April 1, 2019
1.6 years
April 13, 2017
April 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Effectiveness assessed by recovery from MAM, defined as achieving mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≥ 12.5 cm within the 12-week treatment period
Graduation from MAM, defined as achieving mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≥ 12.5 cm within the 12-week treatment period
12 weeks
Cost-Effectiveness
Assess program costs among the four study arms including fixed, start-up and ongoing costs of food supplements, repackaging, transportation, storage, distribution, other clinical and SBCC programming activities, and caregivers' opportunity costs. Link these costs with the effectiveness outcomes to determine and compare the cost-effectiveness of using each supplement to treat MAM (e.g. Cost per Case of MAM graduated).
12 weeks
WHZ => -2 SD among children treated for up to 12 weeks or until reaching graduation based on MUAC whose WHZ was < -2 SD at enrollment
Percent of children enrolled in MAM treatment whose WHZ =\> -2 SD (calculated based on height at enrollment and weight at graduation) at graduation based on MUAC or at 12 weeks of treatment, whichever is earliest, taking into consideration their WHZ at enrollment.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Weight (g/kg/d)
4 weeks
MUAC (mm/d) gain within first 4 weeks
4 weeks
Change in weight-for-height Z score (WHZ) and height-for-age Z score (HAZ), height gain (mm/d), enrollment to discharge and 1,3,6 months post discharge
6 months
Time to graduation
12 weeks
Post-treatment growth status
Up to 6 months after graduation/discharge
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Super Cereal Plus with amylase
ACTIVE COMPARATORCorn-soy Blend Plus and Vegetable Oil
ACTIVE COMPARATORCorn-soy Whey Blend and Vegetable Oil
ACTIVE COMPARATORReady-to-Use-Supplementary Food
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Supplementary food for treating MAM
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Child diagnosed with MAM based on MUAC and enrolled to receive a ration from a feeding site (i.e. enrolled in the SFP)
You may not qualify if:
- Children with bipedal oedema
- Children receiving food rations from another organization (e.g. USAID, WFP, UNICEF) for treatment of MAM
- Children who have previously been enrolled in the study (they are not eligible to be re-enrolled in the study but are still eligible to receive food)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tufts Universitylead
- Washington University School of Medicinecollaborator
- Project Peanut Buttercollaborator
- Caritas Bocollaborator
- Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Sierra Leonecollaborator
- United Nations World Food Programme (WFP)collaborator
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stacy Griswold, MS
Pujehun, Sierra Leone
Related Publications (2)
Griswold SP, Langlois BK, Shen Y, Cliffer IR, Suri DJ, Walton S, Chui K, Rosenberg IH, Koroma AS, Wegner D, Hassan A, Manary MJ, Vosti SA, Webb P, Rogers BL. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 4 supplementary foods for treating moderate acute malnutrition: results from a cluster-randomized intervention trial in Sierra Leone. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Sep 1;114(3):973-985. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab140.
PMID: 34020452DERIVEDSuri DJ, Potani I, Singh A, Griswold S, Wong WW, Langlois B, Shen Y, Chui KHK, Rosenberg IH, Webb P, Rogers BL. Body Composition Changes in Children during Treatment for Moderate Acute Malnutrition: Findings from a 4-Arm Cluster-Randomized Trial in Sierra Leone. J Nutr. 2021 Jul 1;151(7):2043-2050. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab080.
PMID: 33880554DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Beatrice Rogers, PhD
Tufts University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Manary, MD
Washington University School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Beatrice Lorge Rogers
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2017
First Posted
May 10, 2017
Study Start
April 11, 2017
Primary Completion
November 24, 2018
Study Completion
November 24, 2018
Last Updated
April 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share