Pain Management for Patients With Low Back Pain and Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Hospital Setting.
Does a Patient Education Focused on Pain Management Improve Disability, Pain Coping and Quality of Life in Patients With Low Back Pain and Psychosocial Risk Factors?
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with low back pain and coexisting psychosocial risk factors have a poorer prognosis in terms of quality of life, disability, sick leave and health care use. Despite existing literature showing that low back pain patients benefit from cognitive therapy interventions, this has not been investigated in subgroups of low back pain patients with psychosocial risk factors. The purpose of the study is to investigate whether patients referred to secondary care with low back pain and coexisting psychosocial risk factors will have a better treatment outcome when participating in a pain management course in addition to usual care. This will be investigated in a randomised study design, where 130 patients with chronic low back pain and psychosocial risk factors will be randomly allocated to either usual care or a cognitive-therapy based pain management intervention in addition to usual care. The patients will be followed for one year after inclusion, and patientreported outcomes on disability, pain, sick leave, quality of life and pain coping will be collected by the use of questionnaires at baseline, 6 months and 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 29, 2020
August 1, 2019
2.9 years
March 3, 2017
October 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
The Roland-Morris is a 24-item self-report questionnaire about how low-back pain affects functional activities. Each question is worth one point so scores can range from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability).
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Low Back Pain Rating Scale - Back pain
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
Low Back Pain Rating Scale - Leg pain
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
EuroQol 5 Dimensions
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
Sick leave
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
Study Arms (2)
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONAll patients receive a thorough physical examination by a rheumatologist or a chiropractor with a subsequent examination by a physiotherapist.The patients receive general information about the nature back pain, adjustment of analgesic treatment and clarification of any need of further diagnosing or assessment by a surgeon. The physiotherapist furthermore makes an assessment of the patients' physical capacity and function and provides guidelines for any exercise programme. Based on the physiotherapist's judgement, the patient may be referred to rehabilitation in the local community
Group based pain management intervention
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to usual care as described for the control group, the patients in the intervention group will participate in a cognitive group-based pain management intervention. The aim of the intervention is to improve the patients' understanding of their back pain problem, and that they learn different pain coping strategies. The intervention is based on cognitive behavioural therapy including elements of acceptance and commitment therapy, and furthermore uses different relaxation and breathing exercises.
Interventions
The intervention is delivered as six separate sessions of each two hours duration over a four month period. The sessions are managed by a multidisciplinary team from the Spine Center, led by a psychologist. Before the first session, each patient in the intervention group participates in an individual consultation with the psychologist or nurse, with the aim of matching expectations for the group intervention, and hereby ensure the patients compliance throughout the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-specifick low back pain lasting ≥ 3 months
- Psychosocial risk profile defined as a fear avoidance score \>24 (Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire) and/or a bodily distress score \>15 (Common Mental Disorder Questionnaire) and/or health anxiety score \>9 (Common Mental Disorder Questionnaire)
- Speaks and understands Danish
- Age ≥ 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Inflammatory or malignant disease
- Spine surgery within the last year
- Untreated or severe depression
- Psychiatric course of treatment within the last year
- Abuse of drugs or alcohol
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Diagnostic Centre, Regional Hospital Silkeborg
Silkeborg, 8600, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nanna Rolving, PhD
Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The invistigator performing the data analysis is unaware of group allocation. Due to the study design (pain management intervention versus usual care) it is not possible to blind patients and care providers. Furthermore, as outcomes are selfreported, masking of assessors is not possible, as the patients are the assessors.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2017
First Posted
May 5, 2017
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
The data will be available to other researchers when the study results have been published (anticipated 2020). The data will be available on request from the authors.