Classroom Standing Desks for Reducing Sitting Time in Children
Effects of Sit-to-stand Desks on Behavior and Cognitive Function in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this trial the investigators aim to verify the potential impacts of a multi-level intervention with standing desks on behavior and cognitive function in children
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 4, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 9, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 17, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2017
CompletedMay 3, 2017
April 1, 2017
5 months
September 13, 2016
April 28, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sedentary behavior
Sedentary behavior will be assessed trough the sitting time (min/day) given by ActivPALTM micro device (PAL Technologies Limited, Glasgow, UK). The device will be attached on anterior mid-line of the participants right thigh though 3MTM TegadermTM Transparent Film Roll (4 in x 11yd). Participants will wear the inclinometer continuously for seven days, including shower and sleep time, except in swimming activities. The ActivPAL3TM software v.7.2.32 will be used to data reduction. In addition to the baseline and follow-up measurements, the inclinometer will be used during the intervention just in school time to better clarify the sit-to-stand desks use.
16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Physical activity
16 weeks
Academic achievement
16 weeks
Participants self-reported measurements
16 weeks
Stakeholders perceptions
16 weeks
Cost-effectiveness
16 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALSit-to-stand desks (Ergotron LearnFit®) will replace standard desks. In addition, meeting with parents and teacher's training will be conducted in order to support behavior change.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONControl classroom will maintain their routine in sitting desks.
Interventions
Multi-level intervention focused on school environment (furniture) will be conducted. Device: Sit-to-stand desks (Ergotron LearnFit®); Device: (Actigraph, Pensacola, FL, USA); Device: ActivPALTM .
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 11 and 13 years-old
- Be able to postural changes
You may not qualify if:
- Do not return the written informed consent properly signed by parents/guardians
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Danilo Rodrigues Pereira da Silva
Lisbon, 1800-071, Portugal
Related Publications (16)
Owen N. Sedentary behavior: understanding and influencing adults' prolonged sitting time. Prev Med. 2012 Dec;55(6):535-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.08.024. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
PMID: 22968124BACKGROUNDPrince SA, Saunders TJ, Gresty K, Reid RD. A comparison of the effectiveness of physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in reducing sedentary time in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2014 Nov;15(11):905-19. doi: 10.1111/obr.12215. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
PMID: 25112481BACKGROUNDSedentary Behaviour Research Network. Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms "sedentary" and "sedentary behaviours". Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Jun;37(3):540-2. doi: 10.1139/h2012-024. Epub 2012 Apr 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 22540258BACKGROUNDBiswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, Bajaj RR, Silver MA, Mitchell MS, Alter DA. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32. doi: 10.7326/M14-1651.
PMID: 25599350BACKGROUNDOwen N, Sugiyama T, Eakin EE, Gardiner PA, Tremblay MS, Sallis JF. Adults' sedentary behavior determinants and interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.013.
PMID: 21767727BACKGROUNDTremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, Goldfield G, Connor Gorber S. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Sep 21;8:98. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-98.
PMID: 21936895BACKGROUNDRidgers ND, Salmon J, Ridley K, O'Connell E, Arundell L, Timperio A. Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Feb 19;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-15.
PMID: 22340137BACKGROUNDClemes SA, Barber SE, Bingham DD, Ridgers ND, Fletcher E, Pearson N, Salmon J, Dunstan DW. Reducing children's classroom sitting time using sit-to-stand desks: findings from pilot studies in UK and Australian primary schools. J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Sep;38(3):526-533. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv084. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
PMID: 26076699BACKGROUNDGardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M, Biddle SJ. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89-112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
PMID: 26315814BACKGROUNDBenden ME, Blake JJ, Wendel ML, Huber JC Jr. The impact of stand-biased desks in classrooms on calorie expenditure in children. Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1433-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300072. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
PMID: 21421945BACKGROUNDHinckson E, Salmon J, Benden M, Clemes SA, Sudholz B, Barber SE, Aminian S, Ridgers ND. Standing Classrooms: Research and Lessons Learned from Around the World. Sports Med. 2016 Jul;46(7):977-87. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0436-2.
PMID: 26626071BACKGROUNDMinges KE, Chao AM, Irwin ML, Owen N, Park C, Whittemore R, Salmon J. Classroom Standing Desks and Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20153087. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3087. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
PMID: 26801914BACKGROUNDMirwald RL, Baxter-Jones AD, Bailey DA, Beunen GP. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Apr;34(4):689-94. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200204000-00020.
PMID: 11932580BACKGROUNDChoi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Feb;43(2):357-64. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3.
PMID: 20581716BACKGROUNDEvenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26(14):1557-65. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196.
PMID: 18949660BACKGROUNDSilva DR, Machado DGS, Pinto F, Judice PB, Minderico CS, Collings PJ, Cyrino ES, Sardinha LB. Effect of a 16-week multi-level classroom standing desk intervention on cognitive performance and academic achievement in adolescents. Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 1;12(1):14504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18248-y.
PMID: 36050353DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Luís Sardinha, PhD
University of Lisbon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2016
First Posted
May 3, 2017
Study Start
January 4, 2016
Primary Completion
June 9, 2016
Study Completion
June 17, 2016
Last Updated
May 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share