Sex Differences, Cognitive Training & Emotion Processing
2 other identifiers
interventional
82
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This pilot project addresses two understudied questions related to neurocognitive deficits observed in treatment-seeking alcoholics. First, whether cognitive training improves performance and outcomes in alcoholics, and whether men and women differ in their response to this training. The second is whether directed training using affective materials (e.g., emotional faces) is differentially effective compared to that using traditional (i.e., neutral) stimuli.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 8, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 31, 2025
CompletedMay 31, 2025
May 1, 2025
3.5 years
April 28, 2017
February 27, 2024
May 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Emotional Stroop: Change From Baseline in Reaction Time
An interference task involving target words presented over non-target visual stimuli. The primary dependent measure is change in reaction time on trials with incongruent stimuli (e.g., a negative word presented over a "happy" face) from baseline to post-training assessment. Change scores are calculated by subtracting reaction time at post-training assessment from reaction time at baseline, thus positive values indicate improvements in processing speed from pre- to post-training (e.g., 500ms \[baseline score\] - 300ms \[post-training score\] = 200ms \[positive change score\]).
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Trail-Making Task A: Change From Baseline in Task Completion Time
A psychomotor and visual perception task wherein participants connect numbered dots by drawing a continuous line. The primary dependent measure is change in task completion time from baseline to post--training assessment.
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Trail-Making Task B: Change From Baseline in Task Completion Time
A psychomotor and visual perception task with a set-shifting component wherein participants connect numbered and lettered dots by drawing a continuous line. The primary dependent measure is change in task completion time from baseline to post-training assessment.
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Digit Symbol Substitution: Change From Baseline in Translated Symbols
A psychomotor and set-shifting task involving translation between numbers and symbols. The primary dependent measure is the change in number of correctly translated symbols within 90 seconds from baseline to post-training assessment.
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Little Man Task: Change From Baseline in Response Accuracy.
A visual perception task involving mental rotation. The primary dependent measure is the change in response accuracy from baseline to post-training assessment. This change was calculated as the difference between the proportion of correct responses at baseline and post-training asssessments. Positive values represent gains in accuracy. Negative values represent decreases in accuracy.
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Wisconsin Card Sorting Task: Change From Baseline in Response Accuracy
A reasoning and set-shifting task. Participants must determine novel rule sets for stimuli matching through trial and error. Ss must match each 'Test Card' with a 'Key Card'. Criteria for a successful match shift throughout the testing session and may include color, shape, and number of symbols. The primary dependent measure is the change in response accuracy from baseline to post-training assessment.
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Sternberg Working Memory Task: Change From Baseline in Response Accuracy
A working memory task involving numbers presented visually. Ss are presented with a list of digits, one at a time, followed by a probe digit. They must determine if the probe digit was in the original set of digits and recall the digits. The primary dependent measure is the change in response accuracy (proportion of correct responses) from baseline to post-training assessment. Positive values indicate greater proportions of correct responses at post-test, relative to baseline.
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Stroop Color-Word Task: Change From Baseline in Response Time
An interference task involving target words (e.g., red) presented in interfering colors (e.g., blue). The primary dependent measure is change in reaction time from baseline to post-training assessment. Change scores are calculated by subtracting reaction time at post-training assessment from reaction time at baseline, thus positive values indicate improvements in processing speed from pre- to post-training (e.g., 500ms \[baseline score\] - 300ms \[post-training score\] = 200ms \[positive change score\]).
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Visual-Perceptual Analysis Task: Change From Baseline in Response Time
A discrimination task in which participants are asked to determine which complex shape differs among a set of three. Outcomes reflect the difference in response times from baseline to post-test assessments, with negative values corresponding to improved speed at post-test.
Baseline and Post-Training (3 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Timeline Follow-back
30 days following post-training assessment, up to 1.5 months
Moos Health and Daily Living Scale
30 days following post-training assessment, up to 1.5 months
Change in Profile of Mood States
Approximately 30 days following post-training assessment, up to 1.5 months
Mini Alcohol Craving Experience Questionnaire
30 days following post-training assessment, up to 1.5 months
Study Arms (3)
Affective Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects complete baseline assessment, 3 wks of training with versions of the tasks using emotionally-laden stimuli, and a post-training assessment. Subjects will be contacted monthly for 3 months after discharge for follow-up interviews.
Neutral Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects complete baseline assessment, 3 wks of training with versions of the tasks using neutral stimuli, and a post-training assessment. Subjects will be contacted monthly for 3 months after discharge for follow-up interviews.
Control (Non-active)
NO INTERVENTIONSubjects complete a baseline assessment and a secondary assessment approximately three weeks later. No active intervention is delivered. Subjects will be contacted monthly for 3 months after discharge for follow-up interviews.
Interventions
Intervention includes up to 12 training sessions (\~45 minutes each). Training sessions includes practice on cognitive tasks embedded with emotionally salient stimuli. Tasks include a dual modality n-back and a directed attend/ignore memory task.
Intervention includes up to 12 training sessions (\~45 minutes each). Training sessions includes practice on cognitive tasks embedded with neutral stimuli. Tasks include a dual modality n-back and a directed attend/ignore memory task.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Minimum of 10 years of education
- Subjects must have 20/40 or better corrected vision (determined by Snellen chart)
- have no significant hearing impairment as determined by self-report and audiometric testing
- must meet criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence using the computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule - IV
- A craving index is also administered to allow discussion in terms of DSM 5 classification.
You may not qualify if:
- May not have medical or psychiatric histories which would confound participation or data interpretation, e.g., epilepsy, stroke, untreated hypertension, psychotic disorders, anxiolytic medications.
- not be color blind (as determined by psuedoisochromatic plates)
- Endorsement of suicidal intent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
ASPIRE Healthcare Facilities
Gainesville, Florida, 32607, United States
The Sid Martin Bridge House
Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States
UF Health Florida Recovery Center
Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Steward-Marchman-Act (SMA) Healthcare
Multiple Locations, Florida, 32177, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ben Lewis, Assistant Professor, UF Department of Psychiatry
- Organization
- UFlorida
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara Jo Nixon, PhD
University of Florida
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ben Lewis, PhD
University of Florida
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2017
First Posted
May 3, 2017
Study Start
August 16, 2017
Primary Completion
February 8, 2021
Study Completion
February 8, 2021
Last Updated
May 31, 2025
Results First Posted
May 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05