NCT03133767

Brief Summary

Administration of intravascular (IV) fluid is the most common emergency department (ED) procedure. IV fluids are integral to increasing effective blood volume and ensuring organ perfusion in patients with volume depletion and dehydration. There are many options of IV fluids providers can use when treating ED patients. Surveys show physicians do not cite an evidence-based reason for selecting the crystalloid IV fluid used; the decision was likely to be influenced by type and location of practice. A gap exists in the current literature, as there is no evidence for the optimal IV fluid choice for the ED patient requiring IV fluid before discharge. Normal saline (NS) is commonly used as an IV fluid replacement in ED patients. However, NS has been associated with increased risk of acidosis and acute kidney injury. This study will use a novel approach of a patient-centered outcome in a non-critically ill population to ascertain the optimal IV fluid for patient quality of recovery. The results of this study will inform provider's IV fluid decisions between NS and LR. More importantly, the results of this study will have the power to improve patient's quality of recovery following IV fluid administration and subsequent ED discharge. ED patients will be recruited, and participants will be randomized to receive one of two IV solutions (Lactated ringer's or normal saline). Participants will answer a survey before and after the intervention to assess their quality of recovery. The post-survey will be administered by phone after ED discharge. Participants will also be contacted by text message one week following their ED visit to gather information on their healthcare utilization.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
157

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 25, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2017

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 23, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 2, 2017

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 11, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

September 11, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

April 25, 2017

Results QC Date

May 29, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 13, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Normal salineLactated ringersEmergency department

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Recovery-40 Score at 24 Hours

    The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) is a validated instrument that quantifies patient's self-assessment of functional recovery, symptoms, and physical comfort. The QoR-40 scores range from 40 to 200 with a 200 representing a better recovery outcome. The survey consists of 40 questions scored from one to five with a Likert scale, and the total score is the sum of each question.

    24 hours after ED visit

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Quality of Recovery-40 Score After Administration

    Immediately after fluid administration

  • Number of Participants That Filled an ED Prescription

    7 days after study enrollment

  • Number of Participants That Returned to the ED Within 7 Days for the Same Complaint

    7 days

  • Participants That Sought Care From Another Healthcare Provider for the Same Complaint

    7 days

Study Arms (2)

Lactated ringers solution

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will receive two liters of IV Lactated Ringer's solution during their emergency department stay

Drug: Lactated Ringer Solution

Normal saline solution

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will receive two liters of IV 0.9% sodium chloride solution during their emergency department stay

Drug: Normal Saline 0.9% Infusion Solution Bag

Interventions

2 liters of intravenous lactated ringers solution will be administered by peripheral IV

Lactated ringers solution

2 liters of intravenous normal saline solution will be administered by peripheral IV

Normal saline solution

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Emergency department patient
  • Chief complaint of nausea, vomiting or emesis, diarrhea, abdominal pain, dehydration, heat stroke or exhaustion
  • ED provider approves administration of two liters of fluid
  • ED provider states patient is likely to be discharged
  • Patient has followed up with PCP in the last two years
  • Patient has access to phone for next two days following ED discharge

You may not qualify if:

  • Prisoners
  • Children
  • Women known to be pregnant
  • Jaundice
  • Current chemotherapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Friederich A, Martin N, Swanson MB, Faine BA, Mohr NM. Normal Saline Solution and Lactated Ringer's Solution Have a Similar Effect on Quality of Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;73(2):160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Behcet SyndromeEmergencies

Interventions

Ringer's LactateSaline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesUveitis, AnteriorPanuveitisUveitisUveal DiseasesEye DiseasesVasculitisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHereditary Autoinflammatory DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesSkin Diseases, GeneticSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin Diseases, VascularDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Crystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Results Point of Contact

Title
Nicholas Mohr
Organization
University of Iowa

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Fluid being administered to participants will be covered by an opaque bag. The investigator calling the participant for follow-up does not know how the participant was allocated.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2017

First Posted

April 28, 2017

Study Start

May 23, 2017

Primary Completion

November 1, 2017

Study Completion

November 2, 2017

Last Updated

September 11, 2018

Results First Posted

September 11, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations