RCT aiTriage Chest Pain Risk Stratification
HRV Guided Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol for Chest Pain Patients - Randomised Control Trial (HRV-ADP RCT)
1 other identifier
interventional
1,120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Chest pain is one of the most common reasons people visit the Emergency Department (ED). While most cases are not serious, a small number may lead to life-threatening heart problems, known as Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE). Emergency staff need to quickly identify these high-risk patients, but current methods often take time, involve lab tests, and strain already busy EDs. In Singapore, for example, SGH sees over 120,000 ED patients a year. In the U.S., chest pain accounts for around 8-10 million ED visits annually, yet fewer than 10% are ultimately diagnosed with MACE. Still, over half of chest pain patients undergo extensive and costly testing, adding up to $10-13 billion each year. This over-testing is done to avoid missing a critical case, but it's inefficient and stressful for both staff and patients. Traditional risk scoring tools like TIMI, GRACE, HEART, and EDACS require time and blood test results, delaying early intervention. Waiting times in EDs can be 1-2 hours, during which patient conditions may worsen unnoticed. To address this, we've developed aiTriage, a portable device that uses AI to analyze heart rate variability, ECG readings, blood pressure, and oxygen levels. It provides a real-time risk score within 5 minutes, helping doctors decide which patients need urgent care. Unlike current methods, aiTriage works without waiting for lab tests and can ease the load on EDs. No existing devices offer real-time MACE risk scoring like aiTriage. Our previous studies show that this system outperforms standard tools and could transform how chest pain is managed in emergency care, saving time, money, and lives.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Nov 2022
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 29, 2025
CompletedJanuary 8, 2026
January 1, 2026
3.1 years
June 29, 2025
January 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Admission rate
\[number of patients admitted\] divided by \[all patients presenting to ED with chest pain\]
Throughout in ED, an average of 3 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
30-day MACE
30 days starting from admission to ED
Hospital Length of Stay
Within hospital stay, an average of 7 days
HRV-ADP Admission Rate
within hospital stay, an average of 7 days
Study Arms (2)
HRV-ADP
EXPERIMENTALUsing aiTriage risk score for stratification
Standard Control
NO INTERVENTIONStandard control (no AI risk score)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All ED patients (≥21 years old) with chest pain suspected of having ACS will be eligible for being included in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are not in sinus rhythm
- Patients who do not have mental capacity.
- Patients with unstable vital signs, STEMI, obvious ACS, and non cardiac cases like rib fractures, pneumothorax.
- Patients lost to follow- up or transferred to other hospitals within the 30 day time frame.
- Patients with a high percentage of artefacts and ectopics exceeding 30% of ECG recordings will be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
National University Hospital
Singapore, 119074, Singapore
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608, Singapore
Related Publications (2)
Mahler SA, Burke GL, Duncan PW, Case LD, Herrington DM, Riley RF, Wells BJ, Hiestand BC, Miller CD. HEART Pathway Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Implementation: Prospective Pre-Post Interrupted Time Series Design and Methods. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jan 22;5(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4802.
PMID: 26800789BACKGROUNDOng ME, Goh K, Fook-Chong S, Haaland B, Wai KL, Koh ZX, Shahidah N, Lin Z. Heart rate variability risk score for prediction of acute cardiac complications in ED patients with chest pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;31(8):1201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
PMID: 23763936BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2025
First Posted
July 20, 2025
Study Start
November 11, 2022
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 29, 2025
Last Updated
January 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01