NCT07074808

Brief Summary

Chest pain is one of the most common reasons people visit the Emergency Department (ED). While most cases are not serious, a small number may lead to life-threatening heart problems, known as Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE). Emergency staff need to quickly identify these high-risk patients, but current methods often take time, involve lab tests, and strain already busy EDs. In Singapore, for example, SGH sees over 120,000 ED patients a year. In the U.S., chest pain accounts for around 8-10 million ED visits annually, yet fewer than 10% are ultimately diagnosed with MACE. Still, over half of chest pain patients undergo extensive and costly testing, adding up to $10-13 billion each year. This over-testing is done to avoid missing a critical case, but it's inefficient and stressful for both staff and patients. Traditional risk scoring tools like TIMI, GRACE, HEART, and EDACS require time and blood test results, delaying early intervention. Waiting times in EDs can be 1-2 hours, during which patient conditions may worsen unnoticed. To address this, we've developed aiTriage, a portable device that uses AI to analyze heart rate variability, ECG readings, blood pressure, and oxygen levels. It provides a real-time risk score within 5 minutes, helping doctors decide which patients need urgent care. Unlike current methods, aiTriage works without waiting for lab tests and can ease the load on EDs. No existing devices offer real-time MACE risk scoring like aiTriage. Our previous studies show that this system outperforms standard tools and could transform how chest pain is managed in emergency care, saving time, money, and lives.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,120

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2022

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 11, 2022

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2025

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2025

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 29, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 8, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

June 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Triageemergency medicinerisk stratificationAI

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Admission rate

    \[number of patients admitted\] divided by \[all patients presenting to ED with chest pain\]

    Throughout in ED, an average of 3 days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • 30-day MACE

    30 days starting from admission to ED

  • Hospital Length of Stay

    Within hospital stay, an average of 7 days

  • HRV-ADP Admission Rate

    within hospital stay, an average of 7 days

Study Arms (2)

HRV-ADP

EXPERIMENTAL

Using aiTriage risk score for stratification

Device: aiTriage risk score

Standard Control

NO INTERVENTION

Standard control (no AI risk score)

Interventions

Risk score generated by AI App aiTriage for chest pain patients

HRV-ADP

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All ED patients (≥21 years old) with chest pain suspected of having ACS will be eligible for being included in this study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are not in sinus rhythm
  • Patients who do not have mental capacity.
  • Patients with unstable vital signs, STEMI, obvious ACS, and non cardiac cases like rib fractures, pneumothorax.
  • Patients lost to follow- up or transferred to other hospitals within the 30 day time frame.
  • Patients with a high percentage of artefacts and ectopics exceeding 30% of ECG recordings will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

National University Hospital

Singapore, 119074, Singapore

Location

Singapore General Hospital

Singapore, 169608, Singapore

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Mahler SA, Burke GL, Duncan PW, Case LD, Herrington DM, Riley RF, Wells BJ, Hiestand BC, Miller CD. HEART Pathway Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Implementation: Prospective Pre-Post Interrupted Time Series Design and Methods. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jan 22;5(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4802.

    PMID: 26800789BACKGROUND
  • Ong ME, Goh K, Fook-Chong S, Haaland B, Wai KL, Koh ZX, Shahidah N, Lin Z. Heart rate variability risk score for prediction of acute cardiac complications in ED patients with chest pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;31(8):1201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

    PMID: 23763936BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chest PainEmergencies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDisease AttributesPathologic Processes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: ADP vs Standard
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2025

First Posted

July 20, 2025

Study Start

November 11, 2022

Primary Completion

November 30, 2025

Study Completion

December 29, 2025

Last Updated

January 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations