Trans Cranial Brain Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation
Effect of Transcranial Stimulation Augmented With Mental Imagery in Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) refers to a group of modalities that are used to induce electric currents to and within the brain for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Two major types of NIBS techniques are currently in use on humans for clinical and research applications: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Current Stimulation (tCS). Moreover, the studies evaluating the clinical benefit of mental practice in stroke so far are mostly small feasibility studies, while the few randomized controlled trials reported had relatively small sample sizes. As such, the evidence for mental practice in the treatment of movement disorders following stroke, and other neurological conditions, remains somewhat anecdotal. Purpose of our research is to show the effect of combining brain stimulation and mental imagery on functional recovery of upper limb in stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 6, 2022
October 1, 2022
5.3 years
April 13, 2017
October 4, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fugl Meyers scale for upper limb
Subjects will be rated on impairment of upper limb. The maximum score of 66 for the upper limb, higher scores imply better outcomes.
15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Action research Arm Test
15 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALReal Trans-cranial direct stimulation + Mental Imagery
Group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORSham Trans-cranial direct stimulation + Mental imagery
Interventions
The subject will be practicing mental imagery along with mental imagery. A video of the task will be played in front of the patient and the subject will be asked to perform the mental practice of the activity.The video will be played thrice.The electrodes will be placed at the premotor cortex over the scalp corresponding to the topographical representation of upper limb on the contralateral cerebral hemisphere.Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), (or "Transcranial Micropolarization"), is the most commonly used type of tCS \[2, 19-25\]. It employs a battery-driven stimulator to deliver weak direct currents (1.5 mA) through contact electrodes over the scalp. The current flow modulates neuronal excitability by altering the resting membrane potential of the neurons and produces aftereffects.Transcranial magnetic stimulation for 30 minutes, 5 days a week for 2 weeks.Transcranial direct stimulation for 30 minutes, 5 days a week for 2 weeks
The electrodes will be placed at the premotor cortex over the scalp corresponding to the topographical representation of upper limb on the contralateral cerebral hemisphere.Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), (or "Transcranial Micropolarization"), is the most commonly used type of tCS \[2, 19-25\]. It employs a battery-driven stimulator to deliver weak direct currents (1.5 mA) through contact electrodes over the scalp. The current flow modulates neuronal excitability by altering the resting membrane potential of the neurons and produces aftereffects.Transcranial magnetic stimulation for 30 minutes, 5 days a week for 2 weeks.Transcranial direct stimulation for 30 minutes, 5 days a week for 2 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Having stroke past 6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Prior to stroke resulting in aphasia
- Brain surgery in the past
- Epileptic activity in the past 12 months
- Premorbid (suspected) dementia
- Premorbid psychiatric disease affecting communication (for example, personality disorder)
- Excessive use of alcohol or drugs
- Presence of a cardiac pacemaker
- Metal implants
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NIIMS University hospital
Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303121, India
Related Publications (31)
Guleyupoglu B, Schestatsky P, Edwards D, Fregni F, Bikson M. Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations. J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Oct 15;219(2):297-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
PMID: 23954780BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
PMID: 10990547BACKGROUNDRossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
PMID: 19833552BACKGROUNDKobayashi M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2003 Mar;2(3):145-56. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00321-1.
PMID: 12849236BACKGROUNDEldaief MC, Press DZ, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology: A review of established and prospective applications. Neurol Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;3(6):519-526. doi: 10.1212/01.CPJ.0000436213.11132.8e.
PMID: 24353923BACKGROUNDPaulus W, Peterchev AV, Ridding M. Transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation: technique and paradigms. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:329-42. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00027-9.
PMID: 24112906BACKGROUNDWebster BR, Celnik PA, Cohen LG. Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. NeuroRx. 2006 Oct;3(4):474-81. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.008.
PMID: 17012061BACKGROUNDRadhu N, de Jesus DR, Ravindran LN, Zanjani A, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ. A meta-analysis of cortical inhibition and excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatric disorders. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jul;124(7):1309-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
PMID: 23485366BACKGROUNDEdwards MJ, Talelli P, Rothwell JC. Clinical applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with movement disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Sep;7(9):827-40. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70190-X.
PMID: 18703005BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Paulus W. Noninvasive brain stimulation protocols in the treatment of epilepsy: current state and perspectives. Neurotherapeutics. 2009 Apr;6(2):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.003.
PMID: 19332316BACKGROUNDBoggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(2):123-9.
PMID: 17726271BACKGROUNDDavis NJ, van Koningsbruggen MG. "Non-invasive" brain stimulation is not non-invasive. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Dec 23;7:76. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00076. eCollection 2013. No abstract available.
PMID: 24391554BACKGROUNDKrishnan C, Dhaher Y. Corticospinal responses of quadriceps are abnormally coupled with hip adductors in chronic stroke survivors. Exp Neurol. 2012 Jan;233(1):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
PMID: 22116042BACKGROUNDKrishnan C, Ranganathan R, Kantak SS, Dhaher YY, Rymer WZ. Active robotic training improves locomotor function in a stroke survivor. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Aug 20;9:57. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-57.
PMID: 22906099BACKGROUNDPascual-Leone A, Tormos JM, Keenan J, Tarazona F, Canete C, Catala MD. Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jul;15(4):333-43. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199807000-00005.
PMID: 9736467BACKGROUNDMadhavan S, Krishnan C, Jayaraman A, Rymer WZ, Stinear JW. Corticospinal tract integrity correlates with knee extensor weakness in chronic stroke survivors. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;122(8):1588-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
PMID: 21333591BACKGROUNDPeterchev AV, Wagner TA, Miranda PC, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lisanby SH, Pascual-Leone A, Bikson M. Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices. Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):435-53. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
PMID: 22305345BACKGROUNDMix A, Benali A, Eysel UT, Funke K. Continuous and intermittent transcranial magnetic theta burst stimulation modify tactile learning performance and cortical protein expression in the rat differently. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Nov;32(9):1575-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07425.x. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
PMID: 20950358BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
PMID: 20633386BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;114(11):2220-2; author reply 2222-3. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00235-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 14580622BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;114(4):600-4. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00412-1.
PMID: 12686268BACKGROUNDNitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001 Nov 27;57(10):1899-901. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899.
PMID: 11723286BACKGROUNDBogdanov OV, Pinchuk DYu, Pisar'kova EV, Shelyakin AM, Sirbiladze KT. The use of the method of transcranial micropolarization to decrease the severity hyperkineses in patients with infantile cerebral palsy. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 1994 Sep-Oct;24(5):442-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02359800. No abstract available.
PMID: 7838369BACKGROUNDIlyukhina VA, Kozhushko NY, Matveev YK, Ponomareva EA, Chernysheva EM, Shaptilei MA. Transcranial micropolarization in the combined therapy of speech and general psychomotor retardation in children of late preschool age. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2005 Nov;35(9):969-76. doi: 10.1007/s11055-005-0153-7.
PMID: 16270180BACKGROUNDShelyakin AM, Preobrazhenskaya IG, Kassil' MV, Bogdanov OV. The effects of transcranial micropolarization on the severity of convulsive fits in children. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2001 Sep-Oct;31(5):555-60. doi: 10.1023/a:1010487201282.
PMID: 11693481BACKGROUNDStagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614.
PMID: 21343407BACKGROUNDArul-Anandam AP, Loo C, Sachdev P. Transcranial direct current stimulation - what is the evidence for its efficacy and safety? F1000 Med Rep. 2009 Jul 27;1:58. doi: 10.3410/M1-58.
PMID: 20948722BACKGROUNDKrishnan C, Ranganathan R, Kantak SS, Dhaher YY, Rymer WZ. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation alters elbow flexor muscle recruitment strategies. Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.057. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
PMID: 24582369BACKGROUNDAltschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, Foster C, Galasko D, Llewellyn DM, Ramachandran VS. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2035-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00920-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 10376620BACKGROUNDAnnett J. Motor imagery: perception or action? Neuropsychologia. 1995 Nov;33(11):1395-417. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00072-b.
PMID: 8584177BACKGROUNDBarsalou LW. Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
PMID: 17705682BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Faizan Z Kashoo, Masters
Majmaah University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- transcranial electrical stimulation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2017
First Posted
April 21, 2017
Study Start
April 12, 2017
Primary Completion
August 15, 2022
Study Completion
September 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share