Implementation of a Behavioural Medicine Approach in Physical Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Pain
A Behavioural Medicine Approach in Physical Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Pain - Evaluation of the Implementation Process and Outcome
1 other identifier
interventional
109
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Implementation of a behavioral medicine (BM) approach in physical therapy (PT) for patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain is in accordance with the state of science. Translation of research into clinical PT practice is challenging and may demand active implementation strategies. The aim is to evaluate the implementation of a behavioural medicine approach for patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain concerning sustainable health benefits and sick-leave, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the implemented treatment. Treatment outcomes for patients from two groups of physical therapists in primary care will be compared. In one group active implementation strategies have been employed, and in the other (control) passive implementation strategies during a 6-months intervention period. Patients are recruited during one-year after the implementation period. The short and long-term effects of the implementation of the BM approach in PT treatment on patients' sick-leave, activity and participation, and health related quality of life will be compared to the patients from control condition clinics. The cost-effect and cost-benefit of an implementation of a behavioral medicine approach in physical therapy is evaluated from the perspective of the health care organization and society.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 18, 2019
November 1, 2019
5.8 years
March 20, 2017
November 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in days of sick-leave
Self-reports and sick-leave data from the Swedish Social Insurance Administration
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in pain-related disability using Pain Disability Index
Pain Disability Index: Measure of disruptions in seven dimensions of everyday life. Self-reports on a11-graded numerical rating scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in health related quality of life using EQ-5D
EuroQol, Quality of life scale in 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) which provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in the patients' perceptions of global treatment effect Change in perceived global treatment effect using the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in self-efficacy for daily activities using the Self-efficacy Scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in catastrophizing thoughts about pain using the Catastrophizing subscale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in fear of movement/(re)injury using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Active implementation clinics
EXPERIMENTALPatients recruited by physical therapists who underwent an implementation period with active implementations strategies, such as supervision, web lectures, peer learning in groups consisting of colleagues. A behavioral medicine approach in physical therapy for patients with musculoskeletal pain was encouraged with these active implementation strategies.
Passive implementation clinics
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients recruited by physical therapists who underwent an implementation period with passive implementations strategies, such as written material and a short web lecture. A behavioral medicine approach in physical therapy for patients with musculoskeletal pain was encouraged with these passive implementation strategies
Interventions
Physical therapy treatment as the physical therapist chooses
Physical therapy treatment as the physical therapist chooses
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who presents for physical therapy in primary care.
- years of age
- musculoskeletal pain for 4 weeks or more
- ability to speak and understand spoken and written Swedish
You may not qualify if:
- systemic disease
- malignity
- serious spinal pathology
- osteoarthritis waiting for surgery
- diagnosed depression
- neurological disease or injury that severely affect activity capacity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Region Gävleborg
Gävle, Sweden
Landstinget Sörmland
Nyköping, SE-61188, Sweden
Region Västmanland
Västerås, SE-72189, Sweden
Related Publications (11)
Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
PMID: 21963002BACKGROUNDSoderlund A, Lindberg P. Cognitive behavioural components in physiotherapy management of chronic whiplash associated disorders (WAD)--a randomised group study. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2007 Jan-Mar;29(1 Suppl A):A5-11.
PMID: 17650736BACKGROUNDDenison E, Asenlof P, Sandborgh M, Lindberg P. Musculoskeletal pain in primary health care: subgroups based on pain intensity, disability, self-efficacy, and fear-avoidance variables. J Pain. 2007 Jan;8(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
PMID: 16950657BACKGROUNDAsenlof P, Denison E, Lindberg P. Individually tailored treatment targeting activity, motor behavior, and cognition reduces pain-related disability: a randomized controlled trial in patients with musculoskeletal pain. J Pain. 2005 Sep;6(9):588-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.03.008.
PMID: 16139778BACKGROUNDSandborgh M, Åsenlöf P, Lindberg P, Denison, E. Implementing behavioural medicine in physiotherapy treatment. Part II: Adherence to treatment protocol. Advances in Physiotherapy 12: 13-23, 2010 doi: 10.3109/14038190903480672
BACKGROUNDPhillips CJ. Economic burden of chronic pain. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2006 Oct;6(5):591-601. doi: 10.1586/14737167.6.5.591.
PMID: 20528505BACKGROUNDMantyselka PT, Kumpusalo EA, Ahonen RS, Takala JK. Direct and indirect costs of managing patients with musculoskeletal pain-challenge for health care. Eur J Pain. 2002;6(2):141-8. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0311.
PMID: 11900474BACKGROUNDLamb SE, Lall R, Hansen Z, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, Griffiths F, Potter R, Szczepura A, Underwood M; BeST trial group. A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The Back Skills Training (BeST) trial. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(41):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14410.
PMID: 20807469BACKGROUNDWiltsey Stirman S, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.
PMID: 22417162BACKGROUNDHahne AJ, Ford JJ, Richards MC, Surkitt LD, Chan AYP, Slater SL, Taylor NF. Who Benefits Most From Individualized Physiotherapy or Advice for Low Back Disorders? A Preplanned Effect Modifier Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Nov 1;42(21):E1215-E1224. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002148.
PMID: 28263227BACKGROUNDFritz J, Almqvist L, Soderlund A, Wallin L, Sandborgh M. Patients' health outcomes after an implementation intervention targeting the physiotherapists' clinical behaviour. Arch Physiother. 2021 Oct 9;11(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00116-z.
PMID: 34625120DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne Söderlund, professor
Mälardalen University, Box 883, SE-721 23 Västerås, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2017
First Posted
April 18, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share individual participant data (IPD) because the participants have been assured of confidentiality and that only the researchers in the Project will have access to IPD