NCT03118453

Brief Summary

Implementation of a behavioral medicine (BM) approach in physical therapy (PT) for patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain is in accordance with the state of science. Translation of research into clinical PT practice is challenging and may demand active implementation strategies. The aim is to evaluate the implementation of a behavioural medicine approach for patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain concerning sustainable health benefits and sick-leave, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the implemented treatment. Treatment outcomes for patients from two groups of physical therapists in primary care will be compared. In one group active implementation strategies have been employed, and in the other (control) passive implementation strategies during a 6-months intervention period. Patients are recruited during one-year after the implementation period. The short and long-term effects of the implementation of the BM approach in PT treatment on patients' sick-leave, activity and participation, and health related quality of life will be compared to the patients from control condition clinics. The cost-effect and cost-benefit of an implementation of a behavioral medicine approach in physical therapy is evaluated from the perspective of the health care organization and society.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
109

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2017

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2017

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 18, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

5.8 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 15, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Musculoskeletal pain/*therapyBehavioral medicinePhysical therapyCost-benefit analysesTreatment outcomeAdults

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in days of sick-leave

    Self-reports and sick-leave data from the Swedish Social Insurance Administration

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Change in pain-related disability using Pain Disability Index

    Pain Disability Index: Measure of disruptions in seven dimensions of everyday life. Self-reports on a11-graded numerical rating scale

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Change in health related quality of life using EQ-5D

    EuroQol, Quality of life scale in 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) which provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status.

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in the patients' perceptions of global treatment effect Change in perceived global treatment effect using the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Change in self-efficacy for daily activities using the Self-efficacy Scale

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Change in catastrophizing thoughts about pain using the Catastrophizing subscale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Change in fear of movement/(re)injury using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Active implementation clinics

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients recruited by physical therapists who underwent an implementation period with active implementations strategies, such as supervision, web lectures, peer learning in groups consisting of colleagues. A behavioral medicine approach in physical therapy for patients with musculoskeletal pain was encouraged with these active implementation strategies.

Behavioral: Active implementation clinics

Passive implementation clinics

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients recruited by physical therapists who underwent an implementation period with passive implementations strategies, such as written material and a short web lecture. A behavioral medicine approach in physical therapy for patients with musculoskeletal pain was encouraged with these passive implementation strategies

Behavioral: Passive implementation clinics

Interventions

Physical therapy treatment as the physical therapist chooses

Active implementation clinics

Physical therapy treatment as the physical therapist chooses

Passive implementation clinics

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who presents for physical therapy in primary care.
  • years of age
  • musculoskeletal pain for 4 weeks or more
  • ability to speak and understand spoken and written Swedish

You may not qualify if:

  • systemic disease
  • malignity
  • serious spinal pathology
  • osteoarthritis waiting for surgery
  • diagnosed depression
  • neurological disease or injury that severely affect activity capacity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Region Gävleborg

Gävle, Sweden

Location

Landstinget Sörmland

Nyköping, SE-61188, Sweden

Location

Region Västmanland

Västerås, SE-72189, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

    PMID: 21963002BACKGROUND
  • Soderlund A, Lindberg P. Cognitive behavioural components in physiotherapy management of chronic whiplash associated disorders (WAD)--a randomised group study. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2007 Jan-Mar;29(1 Suppl A):A5-11.

    PMID: 17650736BACKGROUND
  • Denison E, Asenlof P, Sandborgh M, Lindberg P. Musculoskeletal pain in primary health care: subgroups based on pain intensity, disability, self-efficacy, and fear-avoidance variables. J Pain. 2007 Jan;8(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

    PMID: 16950657BACKGROUND
  • Asenlof P, Denison E, Lindberg P. Individually tailored treatment targeting activity, motor behavior, and cognition reduces pain-related disability: a randomized controlled trial in patients with musculoskeletal pain. J Pain. 2005 Sep;6(9):588-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.03.008.

    PMID: 16139778BACKGROUND
  • Sandborgh M, Åsenlöf P, Lindberg P, Denison, E. Implementing behavioural medicine in physiotherapy treatment. Part II: Adherence to treatment protocol. Advances in Physiotherapy 12: 13-23, 2010 doi: 10.3109/14038190903480672

    BACKGROUND
  • Phillips CJ. Economic burden of chronic pain. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2006 Oct;6(5):591-601. doi: 10.1586/14737167.6.5.591.

    PMID: 20528505BACKGROUND
  • Mantyselka PT, Kumpusalo EA, Ahonen RS, Takala JK. Direct and indirect costs of managing patients with musculoskeletal pain-challenge for health care. Eur J Pain. 2002;6(2):141-8. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0311.

    PMID: 11900474BACKGROUND
  • Lamb SE, Lall R, Hansen Z, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, Griffiths F, Potter R, Szczepura A, Underwood M; BeST trial group. A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The Back Skills Training (BeST) trial. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(41):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14410.

    PMID: 20807469BACKGROUND
  • Wiltsey Stirman S, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.

    PMID: 22417162BACKGROUND
  • Hahne AJ, Ford JJ, Richards MC, Surkitt LD, Chan AYP, Slater SL, Taylor NF. Who Benefits Most From Individualized Physiotherapy or Advice for Low Back Disorders? A Preplanned Effect Modifier Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Nov 1;42(21):E1215-E1224. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002148.

    PMID: 28263227BACKGROUND
  • Fritz J, Almqvist L, Soderlund A, Wallin L, Sandborgh M. Patients' health outcomes after an implementation intervention targeting the physiotherapists' clinical behaviour. Arch Physiother. 2021 Oct 9;11(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00116-z.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic PainMusculoskeletal Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Anne Söderlund, professor

    Mälardalen University, Box 883, SE-721 23 Västerås, Sweden

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2017

First Posted

April 18, 2017

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

September 1, 2022

Study Completion

November 1, 2022

Last Updated

November 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No plan to share individual participant data (IPD) because the participants have been assured of confidentiality and that only the researchers in the Project will have access to IPD

Locations