N-of-1 Trials Using mHealth in Chronic Pain
PREEMPT
2 other identifiers
interventional
215
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Chronic musculoskeletal pain is an important problem, and treatments are often prescribed in a "trial and error" fashion. Clinicians prescribe a treatment to a patient and then wait and see if the treatment is successful. If the treatment is unsuccessful, they will try a different treatment. The disadvantage to this method is that it may take a long time to find a successful treatment. The purpose of the PREEMPT Study is to test whether using a mobile phone application ("Trialist app") that allows patients and their health care providers to run personalized experiments comparing two pain treatments is more effective than usual care. Patients download the app, and working with their clinicians, set up a personalized trial that makes sense for them. Every day they answer questions to track levels of pain and side effects of treatment, such as fatigue and constipation. Once the personalized trial has ended, the responses to these daily questions on each treatment will be compared. During a regular clinic visit, the patient and the clinician will review visual displays of the results to facilitate treatment decision-making. Approximately 250 patients will be enrolled in the study. Half the patients will use the app and review results with the clinician, and half the patients will continue with their regular care (i.e., will not use the app). The two groups will be compared to see if using the app is successful in improving long term pain outcomes. The goal of the intervention using the Trialist app is to help patients engage actively and collaboratively with their clinicians and identify effective treatments more quickly.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 25, 2018
CompletedMay 25, 2018
March 1, 2018
2.6 years
April 15, 2014
February 27, 2018
April 27, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Pain-related Interference on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale at 26 Weeks
Pain interference measured with Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale 8-item short form at baseline and 26 weeks which measures self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. The final score is represented by the T-score, a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Pain interference scores range from 0 - 100. For pain interference, higher scores indicate greater pain interference. Data table measures show change over time with negative numbers indicating improvement (decreases) and positive numbers indicating increases in pain interference.
baseline, 26 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Longitudinal Change From Baseline up to 52 Weeks Follow-up in Pain-related Interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale
baseline, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks
Longitudinal Change From Baseline up to 52 Weeks Follow-up in Pain Intensity on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale
baseline, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks
Longitudinal Change From Baseline up to 52 Weeks Follow-up on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) MENTAL Global Health Scale
baseline, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks
Longitudinal Change From Baseline up to 52 Weeks Follow-up on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PHYSICAL Global Health Scale
baseline, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks
Longitudinal Change From Baseline up to 52 Weeks Follow-up in Analgesic Adherence (Overuse) on the Pain Medication in Primary Care Patient Questionnaire
Baseline, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (31)
Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale at 26 Weeks
Baseline, 26 weeks
Change From Baseline on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) MENTAL Global Health Scale at 26 Weeks
Baseline, 26 weeks
Change From Baseline on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PHYSICAL Global Health Scale at 26 Weeks
Baseline, 26 weeks
- +28 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Trialist Intervention
EXPERIMENTALClinician and patient set up N-of-1 trial 4-12 weeks in length to compare two treatments for chronic pain. Patient uses Trialist smartphone app to monitor pain and associated side effects daily throughout length of N-of-1 trial. After trial ends, the patient reviews graphical displays of N-of-1 trial results with clinician.
Control-Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONReceive usual care from clinician for chronic pain, do not use Trialist smartphone app
Interventions
Clinician and patient set up N-of-1 trial and patient uses Trialist smartphone app to answer daily questions about pain and associated side effects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Chronic musculoskeletal pain (e.g., neck, back, extremities) operationalized as pain present for 6 weeks or more and a pain score of 4 or higher (on a 0-to-10 scale) on at least one of three items from the PEG pain scale
- Age 18-75 years
- Own web-enabled Android or iOS phone with data plan
- In judgment of treating clinician, pain potentially amenable to treatment with acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), low-dose opioids, a complementary/alternative treatment such as massage or meditation, or a simple combination of these treatments
- Ability to speak and read English
You may not qualify if:
- Treated with surgery, radiation or chemotherapy for cancer in past 5 years
- Other medical conditions that in clinician's judgment would limit life expectancy to less than 2 years or imperil patient safety
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Dementia, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, active suicidality
- Current alcohol or prescription drug abuse; history of disruptive behavior
- Failed 5 or more analgesic medications because of lack of effectiveness or poor tolerability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Veteran's Administration-Northern California Health Care System
Mather, California, 95655, United States
University of California, Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
Related Publications (4)
Barr C, Marois M, Sim I, Schmid CH, Wilsey B, Ward D, Duan N, Hays RD, Selsky J, Servadio J, Schwartz M, Dsouza C, Dhammi N, Holt Z, Baquero V, MacDonald S, Jerant A, Sprinkle R, Kravitz RL. The PREEMPT study - evaluating smartphone-assisted n-of-1 trials in patients with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Feb 27;16:67. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0590-8.
PMID: 25881274BACKGROUNDKravitz RL, Marois M, Sim I, Ward D, Kanekar SS, Yu A, Dounias P, Yang J, Wang Y, Schmid CH. Chronic pain treatment preferences change following participation in N-of-1 trials, but not always in the expected direction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
PMID: 34400254DERIVEDOdineal DD, Marois MT, Ward D, Schmid CH, Cabrera R, Sim I, Wang Y, Wilsey B, Duan N, Henry SG, Kravitz RL. Effect of Mobile Device-Assisted N-of-1 Trial Participation on Analgesic Prescribing for Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):102-111. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05303-0. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
PMID: 31463686DERIVEDKravitz RL, Schmid CH, Marois M, Wilsey B, Ward D, Hays RD, Duan N, Wang Y, MacDonald S, Jerant A, Servadio JL, Haddad D, Sim I. Effect of Mobile Device-Supported Single-Patient Multi-crossover Trials on Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1368-1377. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3981.
PMID: 30193253DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Richard Kravitz, MD, MSPH
- Organization
- University of California, Davis
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard L Kravitz, MD, MSPH
University of California, Davis
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2014
First Posted
April 17, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 25, 2018
Results First Posted
May 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share