Evaluation of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Breast Surgery With a Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II

NCT03116048 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: GZA-ANE-PECS-02
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 121
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Background and objectives The Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II is a regional anesthesia technique that provides post-surgical pain relief for patients undergoing breast surgery. Post-procedural pain relief is known to diminish persistent pain. In this prospective follow-up, the investigators evaluated whether the Pecs II block, compared to placebo, is effective in reducing persistent post-procedural pain after breast cancer surgery in female patients. Patients and methods 140 breast cancer stage 1-3 patients undergoing mastectomy or tumorectomy with sentinel node or axillary node dissection under general anesthesia were randomized to receive a Pecs block (levobupivacaine 0.25%) or placebo (saline 0.9%). Patients were invited between 9 and 31 months after surgery to complete a persistent postsurgical pain survey.

Conditions

Chronic Post-Procedural Pain; Breast Cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Chronic post- procedural pain evaluation through questionaire

  Evaluation of the chronic post procedural pain in breast surgery under general anesthesia with a pecs or placebo block

  1-3 years

Study Arms (2)

Pecs group (study group)

OTHER

Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire

Other: Chronic pain evaluation

Control group (placebo group)

OTHER

Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire

Other: Chronic pain evaluation

Interventions

Chronic pain evaluation OTHER

Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire

Control group (placebo group); Pecs group (study group)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 85 Years
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• participated in the Large-scale Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Pecs II Block for Breast Surgery (NCT02544282)

You may not qualify if:

• patient refusal

Sponsors & Collaborators

• GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus: lead

Study Sites (1)

GZA Sint Augustinus

Wilrijk, Antwerpen, 2610, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (11)

• Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

  PMID: 25220842 BACKGROUND

• El-Tamer MB, Ward BM, Schifftner T, Neumayer L, Khuri S, Henderson W. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):665-71. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245833.48399.9a.

  PMID: 17457156 BACKGROUND

• Poleshuck EL, Katz J, Andrus CH, Hogan LA, Jung BF, Kulick DI, Dworkin RH. Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. J Pain. 2006 Sep;7(9):626-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.02.007.

  PMID: 16942948 BACKGROUND

• Mejdahl MK, Andersen KG, Gartner R, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Persistent pain and sensory disturbances after treatment for breast cancer: six year nationwide follow-up study. BMJ. 2013 Apr 11;346:f1865. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1865.

  PMID: 23580693 BACKGROUND

• Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.

  PMID: 16698416 BACKGROUND

• Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00026.

  PMID: 10825328 BACKGROUND

• Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2215-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60245-6.

  PMID: 21704871 BACKGROUND

• Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

  PMID: 22939099 BACKGROUND

• Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568.

  PMID: 19903919 BACKGROUND

• Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Cowan P, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Sampaio C. Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.019.

  PMID: 19836888 BACKGROUND

• Wijayasinghe N, Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Analgesic and Sensory Effects of the Pecs Local Anesthetic Block in Patients with Persistent Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Pilot Study. Pain Pract. 2017 Feb;17(2):185-191. doi: 10.1111/papr.12423. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

  PMID: 26857336 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Breast Diseases; Skin Diseases; Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

• Patrick Van Houwe, MD

  GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: QUADRUPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 3, 2017
• First Posted: April 14, 2017
• Study Start: May 2, 2017
• Primary Completion: June 12, 2017
• Study Completion: April 24, 2018
• Last Updated: February 15, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-02

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

BE (1)