NCT02798484

Brief Summary

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the method of choice in breast cancer to perform the loco-regional staging and direct the treatment. European Guidelines (EUSOMA) currently recommend MRI for initial evaluation and assessement of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response, for breast cancer. The standard of care consists of realizing a MRI before the start of the NAC and another one after it's ended, six months later. There is currently no consensus on the realization of an interval MRI for early assessment of the chemosensitivity of the tumor. It would allow though alterations in the therapeutic regimen in the event of a non response. Similarly, there is no consensus on when this interval MRI should be performed. Some recent studies suggest that Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging is interesting for the evaluation of the early response. However, these are preliminary studies with quantitative measures realized by the region of interest (ROI) method. A response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in elevated values of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC). The investigator's goal for this study is to evaluate the reliability of diffusion as tumor biomarker. Therefore, they will study the quantitative analysis of the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance sequences in the pre-therapeutic assessment and the early and late follow-up of breast cancers under neoadjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy...) within the CHU Brugmann hospital. The results of this analysis will be compared with the MRI results obtained at the end of the treatment and with the histology of the initial biopsy and the surgical specimen. The expected benefits are:

  • to establish correlations between apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) values and histology
  • to observe changes in the ADC according to the type of response: ADC increase in the event of partial response, ADC stability in the event of non response, ADC decrease in the event of a progression, absence of restriction in the event of a complete response.
  • to confirm that diffusion weighted MRI within a short interval (after one cure, at one month) has a predictive value for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 9, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 14, 2016

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 21, 2016

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

June 9, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 15, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance ImagingBreast cancerNeo-adjuvant therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (mm2/sec)

    Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) expressed in mm2/sec. Magnetic resonance images realised with the Ingenia 3 Tesla Engine (Philips) and the Area 1,5 Tesla Engine (Siemens).Post-processing realized with the Syngo Onco Care application of Siemens.

    Baseline: start of the neo-adjuvant therapy

  • Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (mm2/sec)

    Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) expressed in mm2/sec. Magnetic resonance images realised with the Ingenia 3 Tesla Engine (Philips) and the Area 1,5 Tesla Engine (Siemens).Post-processing realized with the Syngo Onco Care application of Siemens.

    One month after the start of the neo-adjuvant therapy

  • Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (mm2/sec)

    Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) expressed in mm2/sec. Magnetic resonance images realised with the Ingenia 3 Tesla Engine (Philips) and the Area 1,5 Tesla Engine (Siemens).Post-processing realized with the Syngo Onco Care application of Siemens.

    At the end of the neo-adjuvant therapy (typical duration: 6 months)

  • Anatomo-pathology classification - histological type

    The histological type of the tumor will be determined by the Anatomo-Pathology Department of the CHU Brugmann hospital, according to standard of care. The determination will be performed on the initial biopsy samples used for diagnosis and/or on the surgical specimen.

    Baseline: start of the neo-adjuvant therapy

Study Arms (1)

Breast cancer

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients diagnosed with breast cancer and placed under neo-adjuvant treatment (hormonotherapy, chemotherapy) within the CHU Brugmann hospital.

Device: Diffusion-weighted Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Interventions

MRI examinations performed on two devices: Ingernia 3 Testla (Philips) on the Horta site of the CHU Brugmann hospital, and Area 1,5 Tesla (Siemens) on the Brien site of the CHU Brugmann hospital. Diffusion sequences last 6 minutes and are already performed in the standard of care. Compared to the standard of care, one additional MRI will be performed one month after the start of the neo-adjuvant treatment, with diffusion analysis.The post-processing of the examinations will be realized with the Syngo Onco Care application of Siemens.

Breast cancer

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Breast cancer
  • Neo-adjuvant therapy indication
  • Performance status from 0 to 2

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (pacemaker, nerve stimulator, cochlear implant, major claustrophobia)
  • Absence of histological results
  • Disruption of the neo-adjuvant therapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Brugmann

Brussels, 1020, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Fiorentino C, Berruti A, Bottini A, Bodini M, Brizzi MP, Brunelli A, Marini U, Allevi G, Aguggini S, Tira A, Alquati P, Olivetti L, Dogliotti L. Accuracy of mammography and echography versus clinical palpation in the assessment of response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with operable disease. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 Sep;69(2):143-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1012277325168.

    PMID: 11759820BACKGROUND
  • Vinnicombe SJ, MacVicar AD, Guy RL, Sloane JP, Powles TJ, Knee G, Husband JE. Primary breast cancer: mammographic changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996 Feb;198(2):333-40. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596827.

    PMID: 8596827BACKGROUND
  • Huber S, Wagner M, Zuna I, Medl M, Czembirek H, Delorme S. Locally advanced breast carcinoma: evaluation of mammography in the prediction of residual disease after induction chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1B):553-8.

    PMID: 10769724BACKGROUND
  • Balu-Maestro C, Chapellier C, Bleuse A, Chanalet I, Chauvel C, Largillier R. Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment benefits of MRI. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Mar;72(2):145-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1014856713942.

    PMID: 12038705BACKGROUND
  • Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, Helbich T, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Kaiser WA, Kerin MJ, Mansel RE, Marotti L, Martincich L, Mauriac L, Meijers-Heijboer H, Orecchia R, Panizza P, Ponti A, Purushotham AD, Regitnig P, Del Turco MR, Thibault F, Wilson R. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2010 May;46(8):1296-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

    PMID: 20304629BACKGROUND
  • Wu LM, Hu JN, Gu HY, Hua J, Chen J, Xu JR. Can diffusion-weighted MR imaging and contrast-enhanced MR imaging precisely evaluate and predict pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Aug;135(1):17-28. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2033-5. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

    PMID: 22476850BACKGROUND
  • Li XR, Cheng LQ, Liu M, Zhang YJ, Wang JD, Zhang AL, Song X, Li J, Zheng YQ, Liu L. DW-MRI ADC values can predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Med Oncol. 2012 Jun;29(2):425-31. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-9842-y. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

    PMID: 21286861BACKGROUND
  • Just N. Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms. Br J Cancer. 2014 Dec 9;111(12):2205-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.512. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

    PMID: 25268373BACKGROUND
  • Hottat NA, Badr DA, Lecomte S, Besse-Hammer T, Jani JC, Cannie MM. Assessment of diffusion-weighted MRI in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 12;13(1):614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27787-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mieke Cannie, MD

    CHU Brugmann

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nathalie Hottat, MD

    CHU Brugmann

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of service

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2016

First Posted

June 14, 2016

Study Start

June 21, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2019

Study Completion

January 31, 2019

Last Updated

January 18, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Locations