LimiFlex Clinical Trial for the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis
A Concurrently Controlled Study of the LimiFlex™ Paraspinous Tension Band in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis
1 other identifier
interventional
299
1 country
28
Brief Summary
The LimiFlex™ Clinical Trial is a prospective, concurrently controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of decompression and stabilization with the Empirical Spine LimiFlex™ Paraspinous Tension Band compared to decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with concomitant posterolateral fusion (PLF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (Grade I per Meyerding classification) with spinal stenosis. Clinical trial sites will enroll solely LimiFlex subjects or solely TLIF/PLF subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2026
CompletedAugust 7, 2025
August 1, 2025
8.5 years
March 31, 2017
August 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite Clinical Success
Individual success for patients in the investigational LimiFlex or control fusion arm is assessed with Composite Clinical Success (CCS) criteria. To be considered a success, a subject must demonstrate all of the following: * 15 point improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (100 point scale) * Absence of a new or worsening, persistent neurological deficit * Absence of additional surgical intervention * Absence of device integrity failures
24 Months
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Both groups: 6 wks, 3 mo, 6 mo, 12 mo, 24 mo, 36 mo, 48 mo, 60 mo
Neurological Status
Both groups: 6 wks, 3 mo, 6 mo, 12 mo, 24 mo, 36 mo, 48 mo, 60 mo
Additional surgical interventions
Both groups: 6 wks, 3 mo, 6 mo, 12 mo, 24 mo, 36 mo, 48 mo, 60 mo
Absence of device integrity failures defined as device breakage, device separation or disassembly, or device dislocation
Both groups: 6 wks, 3 mo, 6 mo, 12 mo, 24 mo, 36 mo, 48 mo, 60 mo
Estimated blood loss
Procedure
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LimiFlex
EXPERIMENTALPosterior dynamic stabilization with the LimiFlex Paraspinous Tension Band
Fusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with concomitant posterolateral fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation
Interventions
LimiFlex implantation at a single level after surgical decompression.
Titanium alloy top-loading, polyaxial pedicle screws and cylindrical, titanium alloy rod instrumentation using autograft and/or allograft bone (i.e., cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone only), and/or a synthetic bone graft extender that is on-label for these indications (i.e., decorticated posterolateral gutter only). The TLIF requires a single PEEK or Titanium TLIF cage cleared by FDA for this indication filled with autograft and/or allograft bone (i.e., cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone only).
Surgical decompression at one or two contiguous levels from L1 to S1.
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with concomitant posterolateral fusion (PLF) at a single level after surgical decompression.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (Grade I per Meyerding classification), at one level from L1 to S1, with radiographic confirmation using X-ray;
- a. Grade I spondylolisthesis per Meyerding classification includes up to 25% anterior translation of a vertebra relative to the superior endplate of the subjacent vertebra at the index level. A patient is considered to have spondylolisthesis with a minimum 10% anterolisthesis at the affected level in a lateral x-ray image.
- Lumbar spinal stenosis requiring decompression at up to two contiguous levels from L1 to S1, inclusive of the level diagnosed with degenerative spondylolisthesis, and confirmed radiographically using CT or MRI;
- a. At the index level, lumbar spinal stenosis is at least moderate lumbar canal stenosis, defined as more than 25% reduction of the cross-sectional area compared with the next adjacent normal level, with nerve root crowding compared with the normal level, as determined by the investigator on CT Scan or MRI.
- Neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy symptoms including leg pain, muscle weakness, and/or sensation abnormality, with or without back pain as evidenced by patient history;
- Persistent symptoms despite at least 3 months of conservative treatment that may include but is not limited to physical therapy, medications, and/or epidural injections;
- A pre-operative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) leg pain score of ≥50 on a 100 mm scale;
- \* Leg pain includes hip and/or buttock pain on the same side
- A pre-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score ≥35 points on a 100-point scale;
- Candidate for surgical decompression at a single level or two contiguous levels, with stabilization at only one level between L1-S1;
- Posterior element anatomy is appropriate for interspinous fixation including prediction of presence of spinous processes of segment to be instrumented following decompression (investigational AND control groups) and a prediction of \>50% of facet joints present following decompression (investigational group only);
- ≥25-80 years of age and skeletally mature;
- Patient has the necessary mental capacity to participate and is willing and able to participate in the study for the duration of the study follow-up and is able to comply with study requirements; and
- Patient is willing to provide Informed Consent for study participation.
You may not qualify if:
- A primary and predominate diagnosis of discogenic back pain;
- A primary and predominate diagnosis of facet-mediated back pain;
- Back or non-radicular leg pain of unknown etiology;
- Significant peripheral vascular disease causing vascular claudication;
- Significant peripheral neuropathy caused by conditions other than spinal stenosis;
- History of fixed or permanent neurological deficit related to spinal cord injury;
- History of any previous surgery\* at any level in the lumbosacral spine except for a discectomy or decompression;
- History of any previous surgery\* at the level planned for treatment;
- previous surgery includes spinal stimulator placement but does NOT include epidural injections, rhizotomy or nerve ablation.
- Isthmic spondylolisthesis or spondylolysis (pars fracture) at any level in the lumbar spine;
- Clinically significant compromise of vertebrae at L1 to S1 levels due to osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture or any traumatic, neoplastic, metabolic or infectious pathology or congenital abnormality;
- Spinous process fracture(s) or other posterior element fracture(s) of the segment to be instrumented that would preclude secure fixation of the LimiFlex Device to the spinous process;
- Spinous process insufficiency or deformity that would preclude secure fixation of the LimiFlex Device to the spinous process including spinous process length \<10 mm from lamina to dorsal tip or other significant deformity due to trauma, or congenital abnormality such as spina bifida occulta at the planned instrumented level that would preclude secure fixation of the LimiFlex Device to the spinous process;
- The estimated distance between the LimiFlex Device strap attachment points (midpoint of the cranial edge of the cranial spinous process and the midpoint of the caudal edge of the caudal spinous process) is \<30mm on pre-operative lateral standing radiographs at the segment to be instrumented;
- Degenerative lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle \>10° at the affected motion segment;
- +27 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Empirical Spine, Inc.lead
- Biomedical Statistical Consultingcollaborator
- Medical Metrics Diagnostics, Inccollaborator
- MCRAcollaborator
Study Sites (28)
Sonoran Spine Research and Education Foundation
Tempe, Arizona, 85281, United States
Kaiser Permanente Division of Research
Oakland, California, 94611, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
Redwood City, California, 94063, United States
UC Davis Spine Center
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
Kaiser Permanente Roseville Clinical Trials Program
Sacramento, California, 95825, United States
UCSF Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Kaiser Permanente (San Jose Medical Center)
San Jose, California, 95119, United States
The Spine Institute, Center for Spinal Restoration and Foundation for Spinal Restoration
Santa Monica, California, 90403, United States
Boulder Neurological & Spine Associates
Boulder, Colorado, 80303, United States
University of Miami, Dept of Neurological Surgery
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
BioSpine
Tampa, Florida, 33607, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States
Rush University
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Indiana Spine Group
Carmel, Indiana, 46032, United States
Norton Leatherman Spine Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
University of Massachusetts, Dept of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States
Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
Michigan Minimally Invasive Neurosurgical Institute
Waterford, Michigan, 48327, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
UHS Neurosurgery (Binghamton)
Binghamton, New York, 13760, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10022, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13057, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
University of Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
Texas Back Institue, Clincal Research, LLC-Plano
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
University of Virginia Orthopaedic Surgery
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States
Related Publications (1)
Maislin G, Keenan BT, Alamin TF, Fielding LC, Scherman A, Hachadoorian R, Pierre C, Sasso RC, Lavelle WF, Chapman J. Are Randomized Trials Better? Comparison of Baseline Covariate Balance of a Propensity Score-Balanced Lumbar Spine IDE Trial and Comparable RCTs. Global Spine J. 2025 Jul;15(6):2923-2930. doi: 10.1177/21925682251316287. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
PMID: 39868633DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rick Sasso, MD
Indiana Spine Group
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William C Welch, MD
Pennsylvania Hospital Neurosurgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2017
First Posted
April 14, 2017
Study Start
July 17, 2017
Primary Completion
December 30, 2025
Study Completion
January 16, 2026
Last Updated
August 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share