Constraint-induced Movement Therapy to Improve Gait and Mobility of People With Chronic Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this single-subject, concurrent mixed methods study is to investigate the relationship between the effect of the CIMT protocol on gait and mobility and participants' and caregivers' expectations and perceptions regarding the treatment. The goal of the quantitative strand is to assess changes in quality of movement and functional use of the paretic lower limb after the treatment and investigate the participants' expectations in regards the intervention using the Participant Opinion Survey (POS). The qualitative strand (participant interviews) will determine perspectives of caregiver and participant perspectives regarding protocol acceptability. Both quantitative and qualitative data will be collected and analyzed concurrently, through triangulation and complementarity rationales; both data will be equally prioritized.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2018
CompletedJanuary 23, 2023
January 1, 2023
1.3 years
April 4, 2017
January 20, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Lower Extremity Motor Activity Log (LE-MAL)
is a semi-structured interview, created in the UAB CIMT laboratory, that consists of asks the participant the level of assistance, how well is her/his performance, and how much confident he/she is during the execution of 14 different daily tasks (e.g walking indoors, climb stairs) (6).
The LE-MAL will be administered 10 times along 4 weeks. During the first 2 weeks (baseline phase) the stability of the functional use of the paretic lower extremity will be assessed. The last 2 weeks (intervention) the trend of change will be assessed.
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
is a valid and reliable tool to assess balance control in 14 static and dynamic activities with people with different health conditions (7).
The BBS will be administered 10 times along 4 weeks. During the first 2 weeks (baseline phase) the stability of balance will be assessed. The last 2 weeks (intervention) the trend of change will be assessed.
10 meters walking (10MWT)
is a gait speed measurement, which is an easy and reliable assessment of locomotion (8).
The 10MWT will be administered 10 times along 4 weeks. During the first 2 weeks (baseline phase) the stability of the gait function will be assessed. The last 2 weeks (intervention) the trend of change will be assessed.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
5 times sit to stand
The test will be administered 10 times along 4 weeks. During the first 2 weeks (baseline phase) the stability of the lower limb function will be assessed. The last 2 weeks (intervention) the trend of change will be assessed.
6 minutes walking test (6MWT)
The 6MWT will be administered 10 times along 4 weeks. During the first 2 weeks (baseline phase) the stability of the gait function will be assessed. The last 2 weeks (intervention) the trend of change will be assessed.
Life-Space Assessment (LSA).
The test will be administered 10 times along 4 weeks. During the first 2 weeks (baseline phase) the stability of the mobility status will be assessed. The last 2 weeks (intervention) the trend of change will be assessed.
Study Arms (1)
Baseline Phase
EXPERIMENTALThis project will conduct a single-subject pre-experimental AB mixed methods design, considering A phase as the baseline strand. During this phase multiple assessments will be administered. This phase will last 2 consecutive weeks, with 5 visits total.
Interventions
Both phases (A and B) will last 10 weekdays, and during baseline and treatment phases, the data will be collected on 5 different odd days. Considering the long period of data collection. During the baseline phase, no assessment will be administered on even days. The treatment will be delivered daily, along 10 weekdays, 3.5 hours per day. The motor training will be delivered during 3 hours and 30 minutes will be allocated to the administration of the TP. Both caregivers and participants will be individually interviewed before and after treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- be 19 years old or older,
- have more than 6 months after stroke;
- present motor impairment on lower extremity due to stroke, but able to walk at least 25 feet using an assistive device or not, at least three times a day;
- have no previous experience with any LE CIMT protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- presence of uncontrolled clinical conditions;
- presence of other neurologic diseases;
- Mini-mental State Examination score \<24
- inability to answer yes and no questions properly;
- score lower than 45 out of 56 on the Berg Balance Scale, and score higher than 5 on LEMAL, what indicates that they are already utilizing the paretic lower limb while performing daily activities.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Related Publications (10)
Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 May;76(5):406-12. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80568-0.
PMID: 7741609BACKGROUNDTaub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM, Barman J, Bowman MH, Bryson C, Delgado A, Bishop-McKay S. Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1383-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000559. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
PMID: 23520237BACKGROUNDLang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, Boyd L, Jacobson Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens SM, Hornby TG, Ross SA, Scheets PL. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1692-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.005.
PMID: 19801058BACKGROUNDByiers BJ, Reichle J, Symons FJ. Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Nov;21(4):397-414. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036). Epub 2012 Oct 15.
PMID: 23071200BACKGROUNDMark VW, Taub E, Uswatte G, Bashir K, Cutter GR, Bryson CC, Bishop-McKay S, Bowman MH. Constraint-induced movement therapy for the lower extremities in multiple sclerosis: case series with 4-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;94(4):753-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.032. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
PMID: 23111280BACKGROUNDBerg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Mar;27(1):27-36.
PMID: 7792547BACKGROUNDGreen J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002 May;16(3):306-14. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr495oa.
PMID: 12017517BACKGROUNDMong Y, Teo TW, Ng SS. 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;91(3):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.030.
PMID: 20298832BACKGROUNDEng JJ, Dawson AS, Chu KS. Submaximal exercise in persons with stroke: test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with maximal oxygen consumption. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jan;85(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00436-2.
PMID: 14970978BACKGROUNDPeel C, Sawyer Baker P, Roth DL, Brown CJ, Brodner EV, Allman RM. Assessing mobility in older adults: the UAB Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment. Phys Ther. 2005 Oct;85(10):1008-119.
PMID: 16180950BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2017
First Posted
April 14, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
October 1, 2018
Last Updated
January 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share