Effects of the Pilates Method Versus Home Exercise in Individuals With Chronic Non-specific Back Pain
COmEBACK
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Pilates Method Versus Home-based Exercises in Individuals With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
145
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a Pilates program versus home-based exercises in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain. This is a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation. Participants will be sequentially enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: 1) Pilates: Mat Pilates sessions, supervised by a physiotherapist (2x/week for 6 weeks); 2) Home-Based Exercise: face-to-face familiarization (two sessions), supervised by another physiotherapist. After familiarization, the exercises will be prescribed using a booklet containing descriptions of sets/repetitions, as well as guidelines and precautions, to be performed during 6 weeks (2x/week) and monitored in a diary. Participants will be supervised by the physiotherapist (telephone/text messaging). Participants will be evaluated in three different moments: 1) Baseline (pre-intervention); 2) At the end of the intervention (post-intervention, 6 weeks); and 3) After six months follow-up (from post-intervention). Primary outcomes: pain intensity and disability. Secondary outcomes: perception of recovery, postural balance, and quality of life. Concurrently, a cost-effectiveness study will be conducted comparing the Pilates vs Home-Based Exercise, from the perspectives of public healthcare and society. In the first perspective, only costs incurred by the public healthcare system will be included (direct costs related to consultations, medications, tests, hospitalizations, and professional fees). In the second perspective, private health care expenses, costs incurred by patients (transportation and support by caregivers, when applicable), as well as indirect costs (missed workdays and loss of productivity) will be included. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the primary outcomes and cost-utility ratios will be calculated for both perspectives. The cost-utility ratio will express the incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). In addition, the absolute and incremental net monetary benefit will be calculated. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted. Data normality assumptions will be evaluated using the Shapiro Wilk test. If confirmed, a mixed model will be used, for the comparisons between groups and moments. It is hypothesized that the Pilates will be more cost-effective compared to the home-based exercise program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2022
CompletedMay 31, 2022
May 1, 2022
1.7 years
April 2, 2017
May 27, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain Intensiy
Pain Intensity measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, in centimeters)
Change from Pre-Intervention (baseline) compared to Post-Intervention (6 weeks) and Follow-up (6 months)
Disability
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, scores ranging from 0 to 100
Change from Pre-Intervention (baseline) compared to Post-Intervention (6 weeks) and Follow-up (6 months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Health status
Change from Pre-Intervention (baseline) compared to Post-Intervention (6 weeks) and Follow-up (6 months)
Balance
Change from Pre-Intervention (baseline) compared to Post-Intervention (6 weeks) and Follow-up (6 months)
Perception of Recovery
Change from Pre-Intervention (baseline) compared to Post-Intervention (6 weeks) and Follow-up (6 months)
Study Arms (2)
Pilates Method
EXPERIMENTALMat Pilates Program, 2x/week, for 6 weeks, supervised by a Physiotherapist. Sessions will last forty five min, with 4 individuals per session. On average, 10 to 15 exercises will be performed per session, with repetitions ranging from 10 to 20 times, according subject's limitations. If necessary, the exercises will be adapted individually for the three levels of difficulty: basic, intermediate and advanced. Progress will be dependent on the absence of postural compensations when performing the repetitions of the exercises.
Home Exercise Prescription
ACTIVE COMPARATORComposed by two familiarization sessions, supervised by a Physiotherapist. The protocol include postural reeducation exercises, stretching and muscle strengthening, stabilization and mobilization of the spine. Subsequently, participants will receive an educational booklet containing information on low back pain, anatomy of the spine and its relation to the muscular chain, care during daily life activities and the importance of regular physical exercises. Also, it will include a booklet with the prescription of therapeutic home exercises to be performed during the next 6 weeks. It will be recommended that the participants perform the exercises 2x/week. Participants will also be contacted weekly by email and/or telephone, for remote supervision and for checking the prescribed exercises.
Interventions
The protocol will be composed by the following exercises, structured in each session according to progression, difficulty and focus (respiration, stability, muscle strength and joint mobility): Arm Arcs, Bent Knee Opening, Sidelying, Dead Bug, Femur Arcs, Quadruped Series, Single Leg Stretch, Prone Press Up, Sidekick (Front to Back 1 e 2), Leg Pull Front, Mermaid, Spine Stretch, The Hundred, Pelvic Clock, Bridging, Stanging Roll Down, Swan, Saw, Dart, Swimming, Book Opening. .
The protocol will be divided into 3 phases, each one composed by the following exercises and structured according to difficulty progression and focus (postural reeducation, muscle strength, balance, joint flexibility): Muscle strength exercises composed by abdominal exercises; back extension exercises; gluteus maximus exercises. Stretching exercises for the lower back, pelvis, iliopsoas muscle, tensor fascia latae muscle).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of chronic non-specific back pain for more than 12 consecutive weeks;
- Not having attended Pilates or physiotherapy sessions for at least 6 months prior to enrollment.
You may not qualify if:
- History of trauma or fractures in the spine;;
- Diagnosis of osteoarthritis, disc herniation or spondylolisthesis;
- Referred pain (visceral, abdominoplasty, appendicitis, abdominal and pelvic surgeries);
- Previous surgery on the spine;
- Presence of root symptoms;
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Campus UnB Ceilândia
Brasília, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
Boff TA, Pasinato F, Ben AJ, Bosmans JE, van Tulder M, Carregaro RL. Effectiveness of spinal manipulation and myofascial release compared with spinal manipulation alone on health-related outcomes in individuals with non-specific low back pain: randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
PMID: 32026838DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rodrigo L Carregaro, PhD
University of Brasilia, School of Physical Therapy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcome assessor won't have any knowledge about the study purposes and will be unaware of the group allocation. The statistical analysis will also be performed blinded for group allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2017
First Posted
April 13, 2017
Study Start
April 2, 2019
Primary Completion
December 20, 2020
Study Completion
February 15, 2022
Last Updated
May 31, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share