NCT03112629

Brief Summary

Multi-centre, multi-national, observational, prospective registry in four central full access centres in Germany (2), France (1) and the United Kingdom (1) and up to two satellites per hub (smaller hospitals / office based cardiologists (OBC) without access to surgical and percutaneous aortic valve (AV) interventions). The hypothesis is that the management of patients with severe AS will differ between sites with on-site access to all treatment modes and those without such facilities.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
791

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 23, 2017

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 13, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 12, 2019

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 3, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 26, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

March 21, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Quality of Careaortic stenosistranscatheter aortic valve implantationsurgical aortic valve replacementfacilitated data relay

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Referral rates of intervention or conservative treatment in symptomatic severe AS (SAVR vs. TAVI vs. medical treatment) in different types of hospitals

    The purpose of this study is to determine treatment pathways for patients with severe AS and to find out about the critical steps in this pathway with respect to the time-course and treatment decisions made.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Transition of asymptomatic in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (clinical evaluation of shortness of breath, chest pain and/or dizziness or syncope)

    12 months

  • Outcomes (survival) (intervention vs. conservative treatment)

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

symptomatic AS

Patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis in echocardiography who display one or more of the following symptoms: exertional shortness of breath, chest pain, exertional dizziness or syncope.

asymptomatic AS

Patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis in echocardiography who do not display symptoms

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adults aged over 18years identified on echocardiography with severe AS (irrespective of symptoms).

You may qualify if:

  • age over 18 years
  • identified on echocardiography with severe aortic stenosis, defined as at least one of:
  • aortic valve area \< 1 cm2
  • indexed valve area \< 0.6 cm2/m2
  • maximum jet velocity \> 4.0 m/sec
  • mean transvalvular gradient \> 40 mmHg

You may not qualify if:

  • non-severe aortic stenosis
  • previous aortic valve repair

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Bichat Hospital Paris

Paris, 75018, France

Location

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University of Kiel

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105, Germany

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Rudolph TK, Messika-Zeitoun D, Frey N, Lutz M, Krapf L, Passefort S, Fryearson J, Simpson H, Mortensen K, Rehse S, Tiroke A, Dodos F, Mies F, Deutsch C, Kurucova J, Thoenes M, Bramlage P, Steeds RP; IMPULSE enhanced investigators. Severe aortic stenosis management in heart valve centres compared with primary/secondary care centres. Heart. 2023 May 26;109(12):944-950. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321566.

  • Rudolph TK, Messika-Zeitoun D, Frey N, Lutz M, Krapf L, Passefort S, Fryearson J, Simpson H, Mortensen K, Rehse S, Tiroke A, Dodos F, Mies F, Pohlmann C, Kurucova J, Thoenes M, Bramlage P, Steeds RP. Caseload management and outcome of patients with aortic stenosis in primary/secondary versus tertiary care settings-design of the IMPULSE enhanced registry. Open Heart. 2019 Jul 21;6(2):e001019. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001019. eCollection 2019.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aortic Valve DiseaseHeart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow Obstruction

Study Officials

  • Stephan Balduss, Prof

    University of Cologne

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Norbert Frey, Prof

    University of Kiel, Germany

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Richard Steeds, Prof

    Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK

    STUDY CHAIR
  • David Messika-Zeitoun, Prof

    Bichat Hospital, Paris, France

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
12 Months
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2017

First Posted

April 13, 2017

Study Start

March 23, 2017

Primary Completion

March 12, 2019

Study Completion

April 3, 2019

Last Updated

February 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

no sharing of individual patient data is planned

Locations