EUS-FNA of Solid Pancreatic Mass: Comparison Between Negative Pressure and Slow-pull Technique
EUS-FNA
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) of Solid Pancreatic Mass: Comparison Between Negative Pressure and Slow-pull Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
50 patients with pancreatic mass will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using two techniques: negative pressure and slow-pull. Cytological results will be compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 23, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2017
CompletedApril 12, 2017
June 1, 2016
1.2 years
April 1, 2016
April 11, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic yield
cytological results after endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
24 months
Study Arms (2)
EUS- FNA Slow-pull
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using a stylet slow-pull technique of solid pancreatic mass
EUS-FNA Negative Pressure
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using negative pressure technique of solid pancreatic mass
Interventions
pancreatic solid mass punctured with a 22G endoscopic ultrasound needle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pancreatic solid mass
You may not qualify if:
- endoscopic ultrasound non accessible lesions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospitallead
- Boston Scientific Corporationcollaborator
- Medi - Globecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital das Clinicas da FMUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Spencer Cheng
Hospital das Clinicas Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2016
First Posted
April 12, 2017
Study Start
April 27, 2015
Primary Completion
June 23, 2016
Study Completion
June 23, 2016
Last Updated
April 12, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share