Preoperative Prediction Model of Pathological Outcomes (Mesorectum Quality and Positive Circumferential Resection Margin) in Patients With Mid-low Rectal Cancer
PREMARE
1 other identifier
observational
323
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Elaboration of a preoperative prediction model of the quality of the mesorectum and the involvement of the circumferential margin in patients with mid-low rectal cancer who undergo laparoscopic anterior rectal resection. In a second phase the investigators will study the utility of the prediction model in classifying patients with high risk of suboptimal quality of mesorectum and/or positive circumferential margin. Patients with high preoperative risk will undergo a transanal total mesorectal excision and patients with low risk a laparoscopic transabdominal mesorectal excision. The investigators finally will compare pathological outcomes ( quality of mesorectum and circumferential margin), survival and recurrence between the two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2020
CompletedSeptember 5, 2021
September 1, 2021
1.6 years
March 30, 2017
September 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of the quality of mesorectum in the rectal specimen according to international consensus (goog quality, moderate quality and poor quality)
Evaluation of the quality of mesorectum as optimal or suboptimal (international consensus defines three grades of resection: Group 1: including mesorectal resection, good quality Group 2: intramesorectal resection: moderate quality Group 3: resection in the muscularis propria, poor quality). Investigators will group patients into two groups: optimal mesorectum (group 1) and suboptimal mesorectum (group 2-3).
30 days
Evaluation of the circumferential margin status in the rectal specimen according international consensus (positive margin if tumor ≤ 1mm from circumferential margin)
Evaluation of the circumferential margin status (positive or negative) in the rectal specimen according international consensus (positive margin if tumor ≤ 1mm from circumferential margin)
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Recurrence
2 years
Survival
2 years
Study Arms (2)
High risk patients
Patients with high risk of suboptimal mesorectum quality and/or positive circumferential margin after the application of the preoperative prediction model developed
Low risk patients
Patients with low risk of suboptimal mesorectum quality and/or positive circumferential margin after the application of the preoperative prediction model developed
Interventions
To perform a total mesorectal excision through a transanal approach
Eligibility Criteria
Patients affected of mid-low rectal cancer
You may qualify if:
- Patients directed to laparoscopic anterior rectal resection through a transabdominal or a transanal approach.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Histology of adenocarcinoma or adenoma
- With or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
- TNM classification: T2 or T3, any N stage or M stage
- Intention of resection R0
You may not qualify if:
- TNM classification: T1 or T4.
- Complicated rectal cancer or emergency surgery.
- Previous major colorectal surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta of Girona
Girona, 17007, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Planellas P, Marinello F, Elorza G, Golda T, Farres R, Espin-Basany E, Enriquez-Navascues JM, Kreisler E, Cornejo L, Codina-Cazador A. Extended Versus Standard Complete Mesocolon Excision in Sigmoid Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):271-280. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005161.
PMID: 34417367DERIVEDPlanellas P, Salvador H, Cornejo L, Buxo M, Farres R, Molina X, Maroto A, Ortega N, Rodriguez-Hermosa JI, Codina-Cazador A. Risk factors for suboptimal laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Mar;406(2):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02029-0. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
PMID: 33244719DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2017
First Posted
April 11, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
July 31, 2020
Last Updated
September 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share