NCT03106467

Brief Summary

Despite growing popularity, practical advantages of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) over conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) have yet to be established well in pediatric population. The investigators designed the randomized controlled trial to clarify practical advantages of SLA over CLA in pediatric population. The investigators compared conversion rate, intra-operative adverse events, operating time, wound complications, intra-abdominal complications, and postoperative hospital stay, changes in postoperative pain severity, and cosmetic outcomes during follow up period between SLA and CLA groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 11, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2017

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 10, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 10, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

March 27, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

appendectomylaparoscopicsingle portrandomized

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Post-operative pain (visual analogue scale of pain ranging 0-10)

    Post-operative pain is measured by visual analogue scale of pain ranging 0-10.

    up to postoperative day 7

  • Cosmetic satisfaction (visual analogue scale of cosmetic result ranging 1-10)

    Cosmetic satisfaction is measured by visual analogue scale of cosmetic result ranging 1-10.

    at postoperative 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Wound complications

    up to postoperative 3 months

  • Intra-abdominal complications

    up to postoperative 3 months

  • Operation time

    on postoperative day 1

  • Post-operative hospital stay

    at postoperative 2 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy

EXPERIMENTAL

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy is performed through single-port which is installed in umbilicus.

Procedure: Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy

Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy is performed using conventional three-port technique which needs two additional ports outside umbilicus in addition to trans-umbilical port

Procedure: Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy

Interventions

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A 1.5 cm skin incision is made inside the umbilicus and single port is introduced through it. The appendix is manipulated by a combination of a 5-mm scope, angulated, and straight instruments. The periappendiceal vessels and appendix are ligated and divided. Specimen is delivered via the transumbilical port. Umbilical fascia and skin are routinely closed.

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy

Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: CLA requires the introduction of a 30-degree 5-mm or 10-mm rigid scope through a 0.5 - 1.0 cm intra umbilical incision. Two additional 5-mm incisions are made outside umbilicus. Appendectomy is performed in the same manner as described for the SLA above. The umbilical fascia and skin are routinely closed.

Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Acute appendicitis was diagnosed in accordance with following clinical, laboratory, and radiographic criteria; history of right lower quadrant pain or periumbilical pain migrating to the right lower quadrant with nausea and/or vomiting. presence direct and indirect tenderness on McBurney's point and/or right lower quadrant guarding. a fever ≥ 38°C and/or white blood cell counts more than 10X10³ cells per mL on complete blood count. diameter of appendix ≥ 6 mm with mural thickening and periappendiceal fat infiltration and/or abdominal fluid collection on appendiceal ultrasonography or abdominopelvic computed tomography.
  • Perforated appendicitis: disrupted appendix contour with non-homogenous peritoneal fluid collection in pelvic cavity and/or sub-hepatic space simultaneously with above mentioned clinical, laboratory, and radiographic findings of appendicitis.
  • Peri-appendiceal abscess which was preoperatively confirmed by ultrasonographic and/or computed tomographic evidence.

You may not qualify if:

  • Suspicious diagnosis of appendicitis which was not in accordance with the diagnosis criteria.
  • Patients who were subjected to ≥ 2 days of empirical antibiotics therapy for initial symptom prior to diagnosis with acute appendicitis.
  • History of coagulation disorders, shock upon admission, previous abdominal surgery, contraindication to general anesthesia, suspected or proven malignancy, and mental illness.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital

Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Appendicitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intraabdominal InfectionsInfectionsGastroenteritisGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesCecal DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Soo Min Ahn, MD

    Division of Pediatric Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2017

First Posted

April 10, 2017

Study Start

November 11, 2014

Primary Completion

June 30, 2016

Study Completion

August 31, 2016

Last Updated

April 10, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations