Single Incision Versus Conventional 3-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized trial to study the null hypothesis:" single incision appendectomy does not take longer operation time when compared to conventional 3-port appendectomy". The study will be carried out in a tertiary referral center in Hong Kong with a catchment population of 1 million.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedMay 30, 2012
May 1, 2012
1 year
March 27, 2012
May 28, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
operation time
1 year
Study Arms (2)
SILS appendectomy
EXPERIMENTALSingle incision laparoscopic appendectomy
3 Ports appendectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORperforming appendectomy through conventional 3 incisions on the abdomen
Interventions
performing appendectomy through a single incision in the abdomen
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- appendicitis score \>5, imaging showed no complication from appendicitis
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy, mentally incapacitated, previous surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Surgery
Kowloon, Hong Kong
Related Publications (17)
Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1549-54. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e85875.
PMID: 20940605RESULTAdair J, Gromski MA, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and rectopexy case series. Am J Surg. 2011 Aug;202(2):243-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.034.
PMID: 21810504RESULTAgha A, Hornung M, Iesalnieks I, Glockzin G, Schlitt HJ. Single-incision retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and single-incision laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Endourol. 2010 Nov;24(11):1765-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0238. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
PMID: 20849304RESULTFujii S, Watanabe K, Ota M, Watanabe J, Ichikawa Y, Yamagishi S, Tatsumi K, Suwa H, Kunisaki C, Taguri M, Morita S, Endo I. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1403-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2047-9. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
PMID: 22101420RESULTRaakow R, Jacob DA. Single-Incision Cholecystectomy in about 200 Patients. Minim Invasive Surg. 2011;2011:915735. doi: 10.1155/2011/915735. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
PMID: 22091365RESULTChandler NM, Danielson PD. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs multiport laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparison. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Nov;45(11):2186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.07.012.
PMID: 21034942RESULTChiu CG, Nguyen NH, Bloom SW. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: an initial experience using a novel technique. Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1153-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1332-3. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
PMID: 20927545RESULTChouillard E, Dache A, Torcivia A, Helmy N, Ruseykin I, Gumbs A. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1861-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0860-1. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
PMID: 20108149RESULTFeinberg EJ, O'Connor DJ, Feinberg ML, Vemulapalli P, Camacho D. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: an early experience. Am Surg. 2011 Mar;77(3):286-9. doi: 10.1177/000313481107700315.
PMID: 21375838RESULTGoel R, Buhari SA, Foo J, Chung LK, Wen VL, Agarwal A, Lomanto D. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective case series at a single centre in Singapore. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Oct;21(5):318-21. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182311bd9.
PMID: 22002266RESULTSt Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, Sharp SW, Garey CL, Laituri CA, Murphy JP, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011 Oct;254(4):586-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823003b5.
PMID: 21946218RESULTAndersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y.
PMID: 18553045RESULTBone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644.
PMID: 1303622RESULTLin YY, Shabbir A, So JB. Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jan;24(1):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0691-0.
PMID: 19760332RESULTMeinke AK, Kossuth T. What is the learning curve for laparoscopic appendectomy? Surg Endosc. 1994 May;8(5):371-5; discussion 376. doi: 10.1007/BF00642433.
PMID: 8073350RESULTMcKernan JB, Champion JK. Access techniques: Veress needle--initial blind trocar insertion versus open laparoscopy with the Hasson trocar. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995 Feb;3(1):35-8.
PMID: 7757437RESULTTeoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Wong SK, Lai PB, Ng EK. A case-controlled comparison of single-site access versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1415-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1406-2. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
PMID: 20972583RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Canon KO Chan, F.R.C.S Ed.
Hospital Authority
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2012
First Posted
March 30, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05