Effects Of Adjuvants to Caudal Anesthesia on Hemodynamics Measured By Electrical Cardiometry In Children

NCT03101137 | Completed Phase 4 DMC

• 1 other identifier: N6-2016/MD
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 48
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

Caudal epidural anesthesia is one of the most common regional techniques used for post-operative pain management in pediatric patients. In this study we are going to compare the effects of caudal bupivacaine , caudal Dexamethasone with bubivacaine and Dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine on the systemic vascular resistance and the cardiac output, in pediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries, by using the electrical cardiometry (EC).

Conditions

Caudal Block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Change in Cardiac output

  Cardiac output at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes and 30 minutes after caudal block,the cardiac output is measured with L/minute

  up to 30 minutes

Study Arms (3)

Caudal block with dexmedetomedine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Caudal Dexmedetomidine block group (DEXM) (n= 16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg with the conventional general anesthesia,

Drug: Caudal block with dexmedetomedine

Caudal block with dexamethasone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

caudal Dexamethasone Block group (DEXA) (n =16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and Dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg with the conventional general anesthesia,

Drug: Caudal dexamethasone

Control (caudal block with bupivacaine)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

caudal with bubivacaine (CONTROL) group (n = 16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and general anesthesia.

Drug: Control (bupivacaine)

Interventions

Caudal block with dexmedetomedine DRUG

After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken. In left lateral position, the back is sterilized. The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane. The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane. Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% along with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (diluted with normal saline to 1ml) is injected over about 60s. Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.

Also known as: Precedex

Caudal block with dexmedetomedine

Caudal dexamethasone DRUG

After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken. In left lateral position, the back is sterilized. The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane. The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane. Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% along with dexamethasone 0.1mg/kg (diluted with normal saline to 1ml) is injected over about 60s. Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.

Also known as: Decadrone

Caudal block with dexamethasone

Control (bupivacaine) DRUG

After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken. In left lateral position, the back is sterilized. The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge hypodermic needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane. The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane. Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg the control (bupivacaine) 0.25% is injected over about 60s. Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.

Also known as: Marcaine

Control (caudal block with bupivacaine)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 1 Year - 7 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)

You may qualify if:

• Pediatric patients 1 - 7 years.
• Both genders (male \& female).
• ASA I \& ASA II patients.
• Children scheduled for lower abdominal elective surgeries including genitourinary and perineal regions surgeries.

You may not qualify if:

• Parents' refusal of regional block.
• Patients requiring emergency procedures.
• Bleeding disorders.
• Skin lesions or wounds at site of proposed needle insertion.
• Cutaneous anomalies (angioma, hair tuft, nevus or a dimple) near the puncture point requiring radiological examination (ultrasound, CT or MRI).
• Progressive neurological disorders.
• Patients with congenital heart disease.
• Patients with Allergies to used drugs
• Surgeries with large fluid shift or massive blood loss.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Kasr El Aini Hospital: lead

Related Publications (15)

• 1) Shah N., Patel J., Chhaya A. and Upadhyaya R. Comparison of general anesthesia v/s caudal epidural in pediatric infra umbilical surgeries. International J of Biomed Res. 2015; 6(01): 35- 9.

  BACKGROUND

• 2) Almajali Z., Batarseh E., Daameh S., Qabha A. and Haddadin M. Comparison of Postoperative Pain Relief Impact between Caudal Bupivacaine Alone and Caudal Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone Mixture Administration for Pediatric Local Tube Urethroplasty. J of The R Med Serv. 2014; 21(4): 19-24.

  BACKGROUND

• 3) Butterworth J., Mackey,D. & Wasnick,J. Morgan & Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology. 5th ed. the United States: McGraw-Hill Education, LLC. 2013; 877-905.

  BACKGROUND

• Farrag WS, Ibrahim AS, Mostafa MG, Kurkar A, Elderwy AA. Ketamine versus magnesium sulfate with caudal bupivacaine block in pediatric inguinoscrotal surgery: A prospective randomized observer-blinded study. Urol Ann. 2015 Jul-Sep;7(3):325-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.152039.

  PMID: 26229319 BACKGROUND

• 5) Bhaskar D. , Kumar P. , Mridul S. , Vipin D. , Vivek T. and Mohamed A. Comparison Of Caudal Dexmedetomidine And Fentanyl For Postoperative Analgesia. J of Adv Res in Bio Scien. 2014; 6 (1) 51-7.

  BACKGROUND

• 6) El Gendy H.A. & Elsharnouby N.M. Ultrasound Guided Single Injection Caudal Epidural Anesthesia Of Isobaric Bupivacaine With/Without Dexamethasone For Geriatric Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement Surgery. Egyptian Journal of Anesthesia. 2014; 30: 293- 8.

  BACKGROUND

• Deng M, Wang X, Wang L, Zheng S. The hemodynamic effects of newborn caudal anesthesia assessed by transthoracic echocardiography: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Nov;18(11):1075-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02786.x.

  PMID: 18950332 BACKGROUND

• Galante D, Pellico G, Meola S, Caso A, De Capraris A, Milillo R, Mirabile C, Olivieri M, Cinnella G, Dambrosio M. Hemodynamic effects of levobupivacaine after pediatric caudal anesthesia evaluated by transesophageal doppler. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Nov;18(11):1066-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02774.x.

  PMID: 18950331 BACKGROUND

• Larousse E, Asehnoune K, Dartayet B, Albaladejo P, Dubousset AM, Gauthier F, Benhamou D. The hemodynamic effects of pediatric caudal anesthesia assessed by esophageal Doppler. Anesth Analg. 2002 May;94(5):1165-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00020.

  PMID: 11973181 BACKGROUND

• 10) Rajput RS, Das S., Chauhan S., Bisoi AK. & Vasdev S. Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement by Noninvasive Method with Electrical Cardiometry and Invasive Method with Thermodilution Technique in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Wor J Cardiovas S. 2014 ;(4): 123-130.

  BACKGROUND

• Xiang Q, Huang DY, Zhao YL, Wang GH, Liu YX, Zhong L, Luo T. Caudal dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine inhibit the response to hernial sac traction in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):420-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes385. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

  PMID: 23161357 BACKGROUND

• Mason KP, Lerman J. Review article: Dexmedetomidine in children: current knowledge and future applications. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1129-42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b8629. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

  PMID: 21821507 BACKGROUND

• 13) Almajali Z., Batarseh E., Daameh S., Qabha A., Haddadin M. Comparison Of Postoperative Pain Relief Impact Between Caudal Bupivacaine Alone And Caudal Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone Mixture Administration For Pediatric Local Tube Urethroplasty. J Roy Med Serv. 2014; 21(4): 19-24.

  BACKGROUND

• 14) Dalal S., Paul A. and Tirpude NG. Clinical Evaluation of Caudal Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sub Umbilical Surgeries. Research Chronicle in health sciences. 2015; 1(2): 110-121.

  BACKGROUND

• 15) Alsadek W., Al-Gohari M., Elsonbaty M., Nassar N.& Alkonaiesy R. Ultrasound Guided TAP Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block For Pain Relief In Children Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Egyp J of Anaesth. 2015; (31): 155-160.

  BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dexmedetomidine; Bupivacaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Imidazoles; Azoles; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Heterocyclic Compounds; Anilides; Amides; Organic Chemicals; Aniline Compounds; Amines

Study Officials

• Nevine M Gouda, professor

  Kasr El Aini Hospitals-Cairo university-Egypt

  STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: phase 4
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: QUADRUPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: SUPPORTIVE CARE
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assistant lecturer of anesthesia, surgical ICU and pain management - Cairo University

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 14, 2016
• First Posted: April 4, 2017
• Study Start: February 1, 2016
• Primary Completion: December 1, 2017
• Study Completion: January 15, 2018
• Last Updated: February 22, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02