Comparison Between Axial- and Lateral-viewing Capsule Endoscopy in Celiac Disease
Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Axial- and Lateral-viewing Capsule Endoscopy Systems in Celiac Patients: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is recommended as the gold standard in small bowel exploration. The efficiency of the axial-viewing (Given, Imaging) has been widely reported. The CapsoCam capsule (Capsovision, California, USA) has four cameras allowing the exploration of the small bowel through 360 degree lateral viewing. Celiac disease is the most common autoimmune enteropathy in Western countries, and is usually associated with a good response to the gluten free diet and an excellent prognosis. However, a minority of patients develop complications of the disease, such as refractory celiac disease, ulcerative jejunoileitis and neoplastic complications such as adenocarcinoma of the small bowel and enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma. In recent years, the detection of small bowel lesions has dramatically improved thank to the availability of capsule endoscopy exploration. The aim of this study was to evaluate detection rate and diagnostic concordance of the axial view capsule and CapsoCam capsules in the same patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2019
CompletedMarch 30, 2017
March 1, 2017
1.7 years
March 20, 2017
March 29, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Lesions detected
Mean number of lesions detected by the two different types of devices, expressed as diagnostic yield and total number of lesions
up to 24 hours, the time of progression of the capsule through the small bowel
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Extension of the lesions
up to 24 hours, the time of progression of the capsule through the small bowel
Study Arms (2)
Lateral-viewing capsule
EXPERIMENTALExamination of the small bowel by means of the lateral-viewing CapsoCam device
Axial-viewing capsule
ACTIVE COMPARATORExamination of the small bowel by means of the axial-viewing capsule
Interventions
Small bowel capsule endoscopy examination with the Lateral-viewing CapsoCam device
Small bowel capsule endoscopy examination with the Axial-viewing capsule device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients with celiac disease at high risk of complication (see above for a detailed description)
You may not qualify if:
- presence of Pacemaker or Defibrillator
- suspected small bowel obstruction
- impaired swallowing
- pregnancy
- presence of contraindications to a capsule endoscopy examination
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, MI, 20122, Italy
Irccs Policlinico San Donato
San Donato Milanese, MI, 20097, Italy
Related Publications (11)
Volta U, Bellentani S, Bianchi FB, Brandi G, De Franceschi L, Miglioli L, Granito A, Balli F, Tiribelli C. High prevalence of celiac disease in Italian general population. Dig Dis Sci. 2001 Jul;46(7):1500-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1010648122797.
PMID: 11478502BACKGROUNDGreen PH, Fleischauer AT, Bhagat G, Goyal R, Jabri B, Neugut AI. Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease. Am J Med. 2003 Aug 15;115(3):191-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00302-4.
PMID: 12935825BACKGROUNDCatassi C, Bearzi I, Holmes GK. Association of celiac disease and intestinal lymphomas and other cancers. Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr;128(4 Suppl 1):S79-86. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.027.
PMID: 15825131BACKGROUNDCulliford A, Daly J, Diamond B, Rubin M, Green PH. The value of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with complicated celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jul;62(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)01566-x.
PMID: 15990820BACKGROUNDDaum S, Wahnschaffe U, Glasenapp R, Borchert M, Ullrich R, Zeitz M, Faiss S. Capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease. Endoscopy. 2007 May;39(5):455-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966239.
PMID: 17516353BACKGROUNDRondonotti E, Spada C, Cave D, Pennazio M, Riccioni ME, De Vitis I, Schneider D, Sprujevnik T, Villa F, Langelier J, Arrigoni A, Costamagna G, de Franchis R. Video capsule enteroscopy in the diagnosis of celiac disease: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1624-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01238.x. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
PMID: 17459022BACKGROUNDRostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1981-2002. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004. No abstract available.
PMID: 17087937BACKGROUNDRondonotti E, Soncini M, Girelli C, Ballardini G, Bianchi G, Brunati S, Centenara L, Cesari P, Cortelezzi C, Curioni S, Gozzini C, Gullotta R, Lazzaroni M, Maino M, Mandelli G, Mantovani N, Morandi E, Pansoni C, Piubello W, Putignano R, Schalling R, Tatarella M, Villa F, Vitagliano P, Russo A, Conte D, Masci E, de Franchis R; AIGO, SIED and SIGE Lombardia. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov;22(11):1380-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283352ced.
PMID: 20173646BACKGROUNDBardella MT, Elli L, De Matteis S, Floriani I, Torri V, Piodi L. Autoimmune disorders in patients affected by celiac sprue and inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Med. 2009;41(2):139-43. doi: 10.1080/07853890802378817.
PMID: 18777226BACKGROUNDLeighton JA. The role of endoscopic imaging of the small bowel in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;106(1):27-36; quiz 37. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.410. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
PMID: 20978483BACKGROUNDPioche M, Vanbiervliet G, Jacob P, Duburque C, Gincul R, Filoche B, Daudet J, Filippi J, Saurin JC; French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED). Prospective randomized comparison between axial- and lateral-viewing capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure digestive bleeding. Endoscopy. 2014 Jun;46(6):479-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358832. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
PMID: 24285122BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luca Elli, MD, PhD
Fondazione IRCCS Ca´Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The videos will be reviewed by three experts operators blinded about the sequence of capsule examination administration
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2017
First Posted
March 29, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 31, 2018
Study Completion
February 28, 2019
Last Updated
March 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03