Prone Positioning During High Flow Oxygen Therapy in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Optiprone
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background High-flow nasal cannula (NHF) are a promising tool for administering oxygen to critically ill patients with high respiratory demand. Prone positioning (PP) is a simple and cost-effective strategy that since 1980s has been used in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure to treat oxygenation impairment. A large randomized study detected a relevant survival benefit by prone positioning in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation and managed with the ARDS network PEEP-FiO2 table strategy. Theoretically, PP may benefit spontaneous breathing patients too, but data concerning its application in such context are limited to small case series and a retrospective study. The investigators designed a pilot feasibility study to assess the safety and efficacy of prone positioning in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients noninvasively treated with NHF. Methods Patients: 15 adult hypoxemic (PaO2/FiO2\<200 mmHg with respiratory rate greater than 25 breaths per minute) non-hypercapnic patients with acute respiratory failure. PaO2/FiO2 will be assessed while the patients is receiving 50 L/min of 50% oxygen via a standard face mask for a 15-minute monitoring period at study entry. Protocol Eligible patients will undergo NHF for 1 hour in the supine semi-recumbent position (baseline, BL). Afterwards, each enrolled patient will be placed in the prone position for 2 hours. After a 2-hour PP period, the patient will be rotated and will undergo 1 hour of NHF in the semi recumbent supine position (Supine step). Measurements Patient's demographics will be collected at study entry. At the end of the monitoring period, and then on a hourly basis the following data will be collected:
- Respiratory rate, SpO2, pH, PaCO2, PaO2, SaO2, PaO2/FiO2;
- Heart Rate, arterial blood pressure;
- Dyspnea, as defined by the VAS dyspnoea scale;
- Discomfort, as defined by a visual analogic scale (VAS) adapted to rate the procedural pain of ICU patients;
- End expiratory lung impedance (EELI), tidal volume distribution, global and regional lung dynamic strain (Change in lung impedence due to tidal volume/ELLI).
- Work of breathing, assessed by pressure-time product (PTP) of the esophageal pressure and inspiratory swings in this signal.
- Occurrence of pendelluft phenomenon The number of adverse events will be also recorded for each study step.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2020
CompletedAugust 3, 2022
August 1, 2022
1.7 years
March 14, 2017
August 2, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of patients that undergo 2 hours of prone positioning without showing serious adverse events
Number of patients that tolerate the procedure and complete the study according to the protocol without serious adverse events. The following will be considered serious adverse events: * Oxygen desaturations (SpO2 \<90%) * Episodes of haemodynamic instability (Systolic arterial pressure\<80 mmHg or FC\>120 BPM) * Displacement of central venous line, if documented * Displacement of arterial line, if documented
2 hours
Oxygenation
Effects of prone position on oxygenation, defined by PaO2/FiO2 ratio
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Respiratory rate
2 hours
Comfort
2 hours
Dyspnoea
2 hours
Global impedance-derived End-expiratory lung volume
2 hours
Regional impedance-derived End-expiratory lung volume
2 hours
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Patients are rotated from the supine to the prone position for a period of 2 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Respiratory rate\>25 bpm and \<40 bpm.
- PaO2/FiO2\<200 mmHg measured after 15 minutes of heated and humidified 50% oxygen at a rate of 50 l/min via a non-rebreathing face mask. Given the use of the high flows, nominal FiO2 will be considered a reliable estimate of the actual one.
- PaCO2 \<45mmHg
- Absence of history of chronic respiratory failure or moderate to severe cardiac insufficiency (NYHA \> II or left ventricular ejection fraction \<50%).
- Body mass index \<30 kg/m2
- Absence of any contraindication to prone position.
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD);
- Chest trauma
- Cardiogenic pulmonary oedema;
- Severe Neutropenia (\<500 WBC/mm3);
- Haemodynamic instability (Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg) and/or lactic acidosis (lactate \>5 mmol/L) and/or clinically diagnosed Shock
- Metabolic Acidosis (pH \<7.30 with normal- or hypo-carbia);
- Chronic kidney failure requiring dialysis before ICU admission;
- Glasgow coma scale \<13;
- Vomiting and/or upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
General ICU, A. Gemelli hospital
Rome, 00100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Grieco DL, Delle Cese L, Menga LS, Rosa T, Michi T, Lombardi G, Cesarano M, Giammatteo V, Bello G, Carelli S, Cutuli SL, Sandroni C, De Pascale G, Pesenti A, Maggiore SM, Antonelli M. Physiological effects of awake prone position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Crit Care. 2023 Aug 17;27(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04600-9.
PMID: 37592288DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Massimo Antonelli, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Full Professor, Director of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2017
First Posted
March 29, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
June 20, 2020
Study Completion
December 20, 2020
Last Updated
August 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08