NCT03094221

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different types of three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems used for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. The systems will be compared in regards to its ability to successfully map and ablate a clinical arrhythmia, as well as the time invested in this activity.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 13, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 14, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 29, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

October 14, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Arrhythmia Mapping (Yes/No)

    Ability to successfully map and characterize clinical arrhythmia as confirmed with conventional techniques.

    Enrollment (Clinical Procedure)

  • Ablation Success - Elimination of Clinical Arrhythmia (Yes/No)

    Ability to ablate and eliminate the clinical arrhythmia

    Enrollment (Clinical Procedure)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Mapping Time (minutes)

    Enrollment (Clinical Procedure)

Study Arms (1)

Arrhythmia Mapping

The study sample includes patients referred for three different types of cardiac arrhythmias, which will be the studied categories: 1) atrial flutter/fibrillation, 2) atrial tachycardia, 3) ventricular tachycardia. Patients will undergo standard of care mapping and ablation procedures.

Device: Rhythmia Mapping System

Interventions

Arrhythmia mapping will be performed using the Rhythmia mapping system, including its mapping catheter, either in the atria or ventricles depending on the clinical arrhythmia being treated. Detailed mapping will be performed to determine tissue voltage and arrhythmia mechanism/location according to standard clinical practice. This part of the study will take approximately 90-120 minutes. The catheter position and contact will be visualized with intra-cardiac echocardiography, which is also routinely used during these procedures, and to monitor for potential clinically related complications. Images will be recorded to establish criteria for mapping.

Arrhythmia Mapping

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

This study will enroll patients who present for standard of care catheter ablation procedures for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients above the age of 18 years old.
  • Patients with the diagnosis of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias presenting for electrophysiology study.
  • Patients must be able to understand and critically review the informed consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients whom are unable to provide informed consent.
  • Patients with ventricular hypertrophy (LV septum thickness ≥15mm).
  • Patients with prosthetic or stenotic cardiac valves present in the chamber where endocardial mapping is planned
  • Patients with active systemic infections
  • Patients that are pregnant or lactating.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Elad Anter, MD

    Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2015

First Posted

March 29, 2017

Study Start

January 13, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 29, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations