NCT02757430

Brief Summary

The objective of this registry is to assess and characterize the use and performance of the EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System and the EnSite Precision™ Software V2.0 in a variety of electrophysiological (EP) procedures and clinical settings. This registry will assess the clinical performance of the system in a controlled, real-world environment after commercial release. Up to 500 subjects will be enrolled in up to 50 sites worldwide. Data will be collected at enrollment/baseline, procedure and pre-discharge. There is no long-term follow-up required for this registry. The anticipated registry enrollment is about 6-7 months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
515

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 8, 2016

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 2, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 30, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 15, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 15, 2017

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 6, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 8, 2016

Results QC Date

April 12, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Assessment of the EnSite Precision™ Software V2.0 in Terms of Geometry Accuracy

    summarizing the count and percentage of patients with accurate geometry

    during procedure

  • Mapping Time Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters

    mapping time will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate) for the following modules: Manual AutoMap™ TurboMap™

    during procedure

  • Mapping Time Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters With Manual Mapping

    mapping time will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate) for the following modules: Manual

    during procedure

  • Mapping Time Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters With AutoMap Module Mapping

    mapping time will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate) for the following modules: AutoMap module

    during procedure

  • Mapping Time Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters With TurboMap Module Mapping

    mapping time will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate) for the following modules: TurboMap module

    during procedure

  • Point Density Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters

    mapping points collected and used will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate)

    during procedure

  • Assessment of the EnSite Precision™ Software V2.0 in Terms of System Stability

    summarizing the count and percentage of patients with overall system stability

    during procedure

  • Assessment of the EnSite Precision™ Software V2.0 in Terms of Unrecoverable Shifts

    summarizing the count and percentage of patients with unrecoverable shifts

    during procedure

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System Assessment

    during procedure

  • EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System Assessment

    during procedure

  • Clinical Utility and Ease of Use of the Automated Radiofrequency Marker Placement

    during procedure

  • Clinical Utility and Ease of Use of the Automated Radiofrequency Marker Placement

    during procedure

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Any patient undergoing a cardiac EP mapping and ablation procedure, using the EnSite™ Precision Cardiac Mapping system, is considered eligible.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients indicated for a cardiac EP study and ablation procedure using a 3D mapping system
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Ability to provide informed consent for registry participation and be willing and able to comply with the protocol described evaluations

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to anticoagulation
  • Presence of thrombus
  • Implanted with mechanical prosthetic heart valve
  • Recent (\<3 months) myocardial Infarction or unstable angina or coronary artery by-pass
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Individuals whose willingness to volunteer in a registry, in the judgment of investigator or public authorities, could be unduly influenced by lack of or loss of the autonomy due to immaturity, or mental disability, or adverse personal circumstances, or hierarchical influence

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ospedale Cardinal Massaia di Asti

Asti, 14100, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Interventions

Catheter Ablation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiofrequency AblationRadiofrequency TherapyTherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, Operative

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Research Scientist
Organization
Abbott

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
7 Days
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2016

First Posted

May 2, 2016

Study Start

August 30, 2016

Primary Completion

July 15, 2017

Study Completion

July 15, 2017

Last Updated

May 6, 2019

Results First Posted

May 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Locations