NCT03093610

Brief Summary

Previous studies have shown that the removal of the chest tube after lung surgery significantly improves pain symptoms and lung function. The criteria for chest tube removal still remain vague in modern thoracic surgery and rely on personal experience instead of evidence-based criteria. Every hospital has its own traditional standard fluid threshold and believes in that without adapting and comparing it not even after introduction of newer and more minimal-invasive operation technique. According to literature the traditional fluid threshold is varying from 100 to 500 or even more millilitre in 24 hours. Since pleural fluid resorption is proportional to body weight the investigators believe that a body weight related approach of chest tube management would improve safety and would allow an earlier chest tube removal without a higher rate of complication. In this way the investigators believe in improving pain management and in achieving earlier discharge of the patient.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
337

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 28, 2017

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 31, 2019

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 10, 2022

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 20, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

March 22, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of recurrent pleural effusions after chest tube removal

    Evaluation of recurrent pleural effusion after chest tube removal

    up to 6 weeks postoperative

  • Pain scores (VAS-Score)

    Evaluation of Pain Scores after Chest tube removal

    postoperative Period until 3 hours after Chest tube removal

  • Time Point of chest tube removal

    postoperative day of chest tube removal

    Postoperative, expected to be up to 1 week after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient discharge

    At time of discharge, on average 4-7 days

Study Arms (2)

Traditional

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The chest tube in the traditional Group will be managed according to the current Guidelines of the investigators' department.

Procedure: Traditional

Test group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The chest tube in the "Test Group" will constitute the experimental Group. The chest tube will be removed when the fluid production over 24h has reached a weight related threshold.

Procedure: Test

Interventions

TraditionalPROCEDURE

Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid drainage is 200ml/24h or less.

Traditional
TestPROCEDURE

Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid drainage is 5ml/kg/24h or less.

Test group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Lobectomy/ Bilobectomy
  • Segmentectomy
  • Signed consent
  • Age of majority

You may not qualify if:

  • Pneumonectomy
  • Atypical resections
  • Empyema
  • Pleural effusion (not related to surgery)
  • Pleurodesis
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bern University Hospital

Bern, 3007, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Bjerregaard LS, Jensen K, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with serous fluid production up to 500 ml/day. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Feb;45(2):241-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt376. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

    PMID: 23872457BACKGROUND
  • Xie HY, Xu K, Tang JX, Bian W, Ma HT, Zhao J, Ni B. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;21(2):200-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv115. Epub 2015 May 15.

    PMID: 25979532BACKGROUND
  • Zhang Y, Li H, Hu B, Li T, Miao JB, You B, Fu YL, Zhang WQ. A prospective randomized single-blind control study of volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy. World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2271-7.

    PMID: 24158313BACKGROUND
  • Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Feb;135(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.066.

    PMID: 18242249BACKGROUND
  • Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, Haddad FJ, Deheinzelin D. When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Nov;195(5):658-62. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01332-7.

    PMID: 12437253BACKGROUND
  • Irshad K, Feldman LS, Chu VF, Dorval JF, Baslaim G, Morin JE. Causes of increased length of hospitalization on a general thoracic surgery service: a prospective observational study. Can J Surg. 2002 Aug;45(4):264-8.

    PMID: 12174980BACKGROUND
  • Refai M, Brunelli A, Salati M, Xiume F, Pompili C, Sabbatini A. The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):820-2; discussion 823. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr126. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

    PMID: 22219425BACKGROUND
  • Mueller XM, Tinguely F, Tevaearai HT, Ravussin P, Stumpe F, von Segesser LK. Impact of duration of chest tube drainage on pain after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Nov;18(5):570-4. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00515-7.

    PMID: 11053819BACKGROUND
  • STEWART PB. The rate of formation and lymphatic removal of fluid in pleural effusions. J Clin Invest. 1963 Feb;42(2):258-62. doi: 10.1172/JCI104712. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13984113BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Patrick Dorn

    Chief, Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Bern University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
The operating surgeon does not know to which group the Patient will be attributed to.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Group 1: Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid Drainage is \< 200ml/24h Group 2: Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid Drainage is \< 5ml/kg/24h
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2017

First Posted

March 28, 2017

Study Start

May 31, 2019

Primary Completion

March 10, 2022

Study Completion

March 30, 2022

Last Updated

December 20, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No IPD will be shared, All participant Data will be encrypted

Locations