Evaluation of Fluid Output Threshold for Safe Chest Tube Removal - A Potential Way to Decrease Length of Stay in Hospital and to Improve Postoperative Care After Lung Surgery?
1 other identifier
interventional
337
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous studies have shown that the removal of the chest tube after lung surgery significantly improves pain symptoms and lung function. The criteria for chest tube removal still remain vague in modern thoracic surgery and rely on personal experience instead of evidence-based criteria. Every hospital has its own traditional standard fluid threshold and believes in that without adapting and comparing it not even after introduction of newer and more minimal-invasive operation technique. According to literature the traditional fluid threshold is varying from 100 to 500 or even more millilitre in 24 hours. Since pleural fluid resorption is proportional to body weight the investigators believe that a body weight related approach of chest tube management would improve safety and would allow an earlier chest tube removal without a higher rate of complication. In this way the investigators believe in improving pain management and in achieving earlier discharge of the patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 31, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2022
CompletedDecember 20, 2022
December 1, 2022
2.8 years
March 22, 2017
December 19, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of recurrent pleural effusions after chest tube removal
Evaluation of recurrent pleural effusion after chest tube removal
up to 6 weeks postoperative
Pain scores (VAS-Score)
Evaluation of Pain Scores after Chest tube removal
postoperative Period until 3 hours after Chest tube removal
Time Point of chest tube removal
postoperative day of chest tube removal
Postoperative, expected to be up to 1 week after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient discharge
At time of discharge, on average 4-7 days
Study Arms (2)
Traditional
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe chest tube in the traditional Group will be managed according to the current Guidelines of the investigators' department.
Test group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe chest tube in the "Test Group" will constitute the experimental Group. The chest tube will be removed when the fluid production over 24h has reached a weight related threshold.
Interventions
Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid drainage is 200ml/24h or less.
Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid drainage is 5ml/kg/24h or less.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lobectomy/ Bilobectomy
- Segmentectomy
- Signed consent
- Age of majority
You may not qualify if:
- Pneumonectomy
- Atypical resections
- Empyema
- Pleural effusion (not related to surgery)
- Pleurodesis
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bern University Hospital
Bern, 3007, Switzerland
Related Publications (9)
Bjerregaard LS, Jensen K, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with serous fluid production up to 500 ml/day. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Feb;45(2):241-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt376. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
PMID: 23872457BACKGROUNDXie HY, Xu K, Tang JX, Bian W, Ma HT, Zhao J, Ni B. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;21(2):200-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv115. Epub 2015 May 15.
PMID: 25979532BACKGROUNDZhang Y, Li H, Hu B, Li T, Miao JB, You B, Fu YL, Zhang WQ. A prospective randomized single-blind control study of volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy. World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2271-7.
PMID: 24158313BACKGROUNDCerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Feb;135(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.066.
PMID: 18242249BACKGROUNDYounes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, Haddad FJ, Deheinzelin D. When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Nov;195(5):658-62. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01332-7.
PMID: 12437253BACKGROUNDIrshad K, Feldman LS, Chu VF, Dorval JF, Baslaim G, Morin JE. Causes of increased length of hospitalization on a general thoracic surgery service: a prospective observational study. Can J Surg. 2002 Aug;45(4):264-8.
PMID: 12174980BACKGROUNDRefai M, Brunelli A, Salati M, Xiume F, Pompili C, Sabbatini A. The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):820-2; discussion 823. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr126. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
PMID: 22219425BACKGROUNDMueller XM, Tinguely F, Tevaearai HT, Ravussin P, Stumpe F, von Segesser LK. Impact of duration of chest tube drainage on pain after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Nov;18(5):570-4. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00515-7.
PMID: 11053819BACKGROUNDSTEWART PB. The rate of formation and lymphatic removal of fluid in pleural effusions. J Clin Invest. 1963 Feb;42(2):258-62. doi: 10.1172/JCI104712. No abstract available.
PMID: 13984113BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Patrick Dorn
Chief, Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Bern University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- The operating surgeon does not know to which group the Patient will be attributed to.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2017
First Posted
March 28, 2017
Study Start
May 31, 2019
Primary Completion
March 10, 2022
Study Completion
March 30, 2022
Last Updated
December 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No IPD will be shared, All participant Data will be encrypted