NCT03088566

Brief Summary

Early identification of potential risk factors for the onset of diabetic foot ulcers are recommended. However, in a Swedish context, there has been no standardised routines to be used in the foot screening procedure. In this study a new standardised routine, the D-Foot, will be tested at the Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics. The usability of the web program will be tested.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2017

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 23, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 15, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 15, 2017

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 5, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 10, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 4, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patients reported experience measure (PREM)

    Orthotic and Prosthetic Users survey will be used to evaluate if the PREM scores are higher in the group that was foot screened following the D-Foot method. MEASURE is scored to range from 0 (the lowest possible score) to 100 (the highest possible score).

    one month

  • Patients reported experience measure (PREM)

    A selection of questions from the Swedish national patient survey will be used to evaluate if the PREM scores are higher in the group that was foot screened following the D-Foot method

    one month

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • PREM

    one month

  • Patients reported outcome measure (PROM)

    one month

Study Arms (2)

The D-Foot method

EXPERIMENTAL

The patients are being foot screened following the routine that is programmed in the D-Foot.

Procedure: The D-Foot method

Conventional foot screening

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients are being foot screened according to conventional methods.

Procedure: Conventional foot screening

Interventions

The D-Foot method is a standardised routine of foot screening. The D-Foot i web program aimed to be used on a surf plate.

The D-Foot method

The foot screening is performed with clinical conventional methods.

Conventional foot screening

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diabetes
  • patients referred to the Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics at Sahlgrenska University Hospital with the aim to be provided with assistive devices with the purpose to protect the feet from foot ulcers
  • be able to read and understand the Swedish language

You may not qualify if:

  • \*being unable to read and understand the Swedish language

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Prostetics & Orthotics

Gothenburg, Region Västragötaland, 41285, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hellstrand Tang U, Tranberg R, Sundberg L, Scandurra I. How do patients and healthcare professionals experience foot examinations in diabetes care? - A randomised controlled study of digital foot examinations versus traditional foot examinations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):1387. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11674-w.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetic AngiopathiesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesFoot UlcerLeg UlcerSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System DiseasesDiabetic Neuropathies

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The randomisation will be determined by sequencing patients into on of the two groups following the grouping found in closed envelopes.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomised controlled study. One group will be foot screened following the routine described in the web program, the D-Foot. The other group will be foot screened by the use of conventional methods.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Certified prosthetist and orthotist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2017

First Posted

March 23, 2017

Study Start

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion

December 15, 2017

Study Completion

December 31, 2021

Last Updated

May 5, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations