Regadenoson vs Dipyridamole in Use as Pharmacological Stress Agent Before SPECT
REDUCE
Descriptive Study Comparing Regadenoson Versus Dipyridamole in Use as Pharmacological Stress Agent Before a Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)
1 other identifier
observational
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy is to evaluate coronary perfusion as well as heart muscle function. This examination takes place in two stages, one imaging at rest and one after a cardiac stress caused. This stress can be triggered as a first-line stress test. A pharmacological stress is proposed when stress test is not possible or contraindicated, Several drugs have a marketing authorization in this indication (adenosine, dipyridamole, regadenoson, dobutamine). Among them, the regadenoson is the most recent molecule. Marketed in France since 2013, it would allow a reduction of undesirable effects compared to other agents, especially adenosine. It is simple and quick to use thanks to a single dose administration. However, its cost is nearly 30 times higher than dipyridamole. In the investigational center, dipyridamole is currently the first-line pharmacological stress agent, whereas regadenoson is reserved for a limited number of doses, the indication of which must be justified (asthmatic patient or with severe COPD). Few studies in the literature specifically compare these two pharmacological agents (examination time, cost, tolerance) and the opinion on the use of regadenoson in the service is limited.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 9, 2017
CompletedApril 13, 2018
March 1, 2017
5 months
March 8, 2017
April 12, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of the test
Evaluate the time savings from the use of regadenoson versus dipyridamole by comparing the duration of the test.
24 hours (Visit 1: During the examen)
Study Arms (2)
Dipyridamole
stress test impossible or contraindicated (first intention)
Regadenoson
stress test and dipyridamole impossible or contraindicated. In particular, patients with severe COPD or asthmatic patient. (second intention)
Interventions
Examination time : time from patient setup and launch of the pre-test to the end of the patient monitoring Functional tolerability : functional assessed by the patient Clinical tolerability : clinical score by the cardiologist
Eligibility Criteria
Patients reffered for an indication of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the nuclear medicine unit
You may qualify if:
- Adult ≥ 18 years
- Myocardial scintigraphy by pharmacological stress agent
- Used molecules = Dipyridamole or Regadenoson
You may not qualify if:
- Physical stress test by single or mixed effort (associating pharmacological stress)
- Pharmacological agent used = Adenosine
- Double isotope protocol
- Patient refusal due to study information
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lyon civil Hospital - Est Hospital Complexe - Nuclear Medicine Service
Bron, 69677, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian SCHEIBER, Pr
Lyon civil Hospital - Est Hospital Complexe - Nuclear Medicine Service
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2017
First Posted
March 21, 2017
Study Start
May 3, 2017
Primary Completion
October 9, 2017
Study Completion
October 9, 2017
Last Updated
April 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-03