The Effect of Diuretics on Mineral and Bone Disorder in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
The Effect of Thiazide and Loop Diuretic on Mineral and Bone Disorder in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients often have associated systemic hypertension due to volume retention, as one of the mechanisms, therefore the use of diuretics is widespread in this population. One of the major complications of CKD is mineral and bone metabolism disorder (CKD-MBD), which include changes in the levels of calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D deficiency, increased circulating levels of fibroblast growth factor (FGF-23) and parathyroid hormone (PTH). These alterations are responsible for fractures, cardiovascular disease and mortality among patients with CKD. According to diuretic mechanism of action, sometimes increasing serum calcium (in the case of furosemide), sometimes decreasing it (in the case of thiazide), it is expected that the serum calcium may be altered, even within the range of normality, with consequent impact on the levels of PTH. Although most studies have shown that the use of thiazide diuretics decreases the risk of fractures, some showed the opposite. Similarly, although most studies have shown increased risk of fracture in association to loop diuretics use, some have failed in demonstrated this outcome. Only one study, a cohort study in a population of CKD, showed that furosemide was directly related to increased calciuria and PTH levels and the use of thiazide, in turn, showed completely opposite effect. However, certain issues are still not completely solved, for example, the interference of renal function itself on calciuria. It is possible that calciuria is not a so simple explanation that justifies the PTH levels changes, as no correlation was seen between calciuria and PTH levels. Better understanding of the exact relationship between the use of diuretics and the impact on CKD-MBD may be an alternative intervention, easily accessible and relatively inexpensive. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of diuretic, specifically hydrochlorothiazide and furosemide, on bone architecture and mineral metabolism.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 26, 2017
October 1, 2017
2.8 years
February 27, 2017
October 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) level.
Bone metabolism
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Furosemide
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of Furosemide, 40mg (1 tablet) per day, over 12 months
Hydrochlorothiazide
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of Hydrochlorothiazide, 25mg (1 tablet) per day, over 12 months
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (calculated by CKD-EPI) between 30 and 60 ml/min
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetes;
- chronic use of: steroid, bisphosphonates and calcium carbonate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital das Clinicas
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rosilene M Elias, M.D., Ph.D
University of Sao Paulo
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2017
First Posted
March 17, 2017
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 26, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share