Multi-center Prospective Study Determining the Sustainability of Pain Relief and Psychosocial and Functional Responses When Utilizing a Multiple Waveform Enabled Neurostimulator
TRIUMPH
1 other identifier
interventional
269
7 countries
22
Brief Summary
The TRIUMPH study is a post-market, international, multicenter, interventional, prospective, single-arm study intended to evaluate the sustainability of pain control and psychosocial and functional responses utilizing a multiple-waveform enabled neurostimulator in subjects with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
22 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 26, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 2, 2021
CompletedJuly 8, 2021
July 1, 2021
1.9 years
March 13, 2017
March 30, 2021
July 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Baseline to 6 Months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline to 6 Months
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline to 6 Months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (65)
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline to 12 Months
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline to 18 Months
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline to 24 Months
- +62 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
All enrolled subjects
OTHERAll subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG).
Interventions
Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs, including unilateral or bilateral pain associated with the following: failed back surgery syndrome and intractable low back and leg pain.
- Subject has a score of 6 or higher on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for average pain specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated over the past 24 hours at the baseline visit.
- Subject is considered by the Investigator as a candidate for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator system according to the system Instructions For Use.
- Subject is 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment.
- Subject is willing to cooperate with the study requirements including compliance with the regimen and completion of all study visits.
- Subject has signed and received a copy of the Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (EC/IRB) approved informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject currently has a spinal cord stimulation system implanted.
- Subject has previously failed spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy (either trial system evaluation or permanent implant).
- Subject has a primary diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Angina Pectoris, or Chronic Migraine.
- Subject has or plans to have a Peripheral Nerve Stimulation system (PNS), Peripheral Nerve field Stimulation system (PNfS), Dorsal Root Ganglion system (DRG), or implantable infusion pump.
- Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation with an active treatment arm.
- Subject unable to read and/or write.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (22)
The CORE Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85351, United States
Tory McJunkin MD
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255, United States
Pain Institute of Southern Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Chicago Anesthesia Associates, S.C.
Chicago, Illinois, 60657, United States
Pacific Sports & Spine
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
St. Luke's Hospital & Health Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18951, United States
Performance Spine and Sports Physicians, P.C.
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19403, United States
Clinical Trials of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406, United States
Carolinas Center for Advanced Management of Pain
Greenville, South Carolina, 29316, United States
Azalea Orthopedics
Tyler, Texas, 75701, United States
Advanced Pain Management
Greenfield, Wisconsin, 53221, United States
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada
CHA L'Enfant Jesus
Québec, G1J 1Z4, Canada
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Eastern Finland, 70211, Finland
Neurochirurgische Praxis Neuss
Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, 41460, Germany
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Instituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Milan, Lombardy, 20133, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Univsitaria Pisana
Pisa, Tuscany, 56126, Italy
Hospital Virgin de Rocio
Seville, Andalusia, 41013, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, Aragon, 50009, Spain
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, 28222, Spain
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026, Spain
Ensemble Hospitalier de la Cote, Hopital de Morges
Morges, 1110, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Deer TR, Falowski SM, Moore GA, Hutcheson JK, Pena I, Candido K, Cornidez EG, Fraunberg VUZ, Blomme B, Capobianco RA. Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Provides Sustainable Improvements in Pain and Psychosocial Function: 2-year Results From the TRIUMPH Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Apr 1;47(7):548-556. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004283.
PMID: 34812195DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robyn Capobianco
- Organization
- Abbott
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Marie Fahey
Abbott
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2017
First Posted
March 17, 2017
Study Start
March 3, 2017
Primary Completion
January 24, 2019
Study Completion
August 26, 2020
Last Updated
July 8, 2021
Results First Posted
June 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share