SUNBURST (Success Using Neuromodulation With BURST) Study
SUNBURST
Success Using Neuromodulation With BURST (SUNBURST™) Study
1 other identifier
interventional
173
1 country
20
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Prodigy system for the treatment of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Dec 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 18, 2017
CompletedJanuary 30, 2019
January 1, 2019
2.1 years
December 10, 2013
February 1, 2017
January 28, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Diary Scores for Average Overall Pain
Differences for average daily overall pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain diary between Burst and Tonic Stimulation. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were averaged using a 7 day diary where the subject rates his/her pain on a horizontal line, from 0 mm to 100mm in length, anchored by word descriptors on each end (no pain to worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Over 7 days after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Subjects With Response as Measured by Overall Daily Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Over 7 days at baseline and after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulation
Percentage of Paresthesia Coverage
During in-office visit after 3 months of treatment while utilizing burst or tonic stimulation
Test for Superiority of Overall Daily Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score With Burst Stimulation
Over 7 days after 3 months of treatment of burst or tonic stimulation
Study Arms (2)
Burst Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALBurst Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Tonic Stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORTonic Stimulation using the Prodigy system
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is 22 years of age or older
- Subject has chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs
- Subject has a average score of 60 or higher for average daily overall pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 7 day pain diary
- Subject has attempted "best" medical therapy and has tried and failed at least three documented medically supervised treatments (including, but not limited to physical therapy, acupuncture, etc.) and has failed medication treatment from at least two different classes
- Subject's pain-related medication regimen is stable 4 weeks prior to the baseline evaluation
- Subject agrees not to add or increase pain-related medication from activation through the 24 week follow-up visit
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm
- Subject has been implanted with a previous neurostimulation system or participated in a trial period for a neurostimulation system
- Subject's overall Beck Depression Inventory II Score is \>24 or has a score of 3 on question 9 relating to suicidal thoughts or wishes at the screening visit
- Subject has an infusion pump or any implantable neurostimulator device
- Subjects with concurrent clinically significant or disabling chronic pain problem that requires additional treatment
- Subject has an existing medical condition that is likely to require repetitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation in the future (i.e. epilepsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis, acoustic neuroma, tumor)
- Subject has an existing medical condition that is likely to require the use of diathermy in the future
- Subject's pain originates from peripheral vascular disease
- Subject is immunocompromised
- Subject has documented history of allergic response to titanium or silicone
- Subject has a documented history of substance abuse (narcotics, alcohol, etc.) or substance dependency in the 6 months prior to baseline data collection
- Female candidates of child bearing potential that are pregnant (confirmed by positive urine/blood pregnancy test)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (20)
Newport Beach Headache and Pain
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
Napa Biomedical Services
Napa, California, 94558, United States
Eisenhower Desert Orthopedic Center
Rancho Mirage, California, 92270, United States
IPM Medical Group
Walnut Creek, California, 94598, United States
Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Bronson Neuroscience Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007, United States
The Neuroscience Center
Biloxi, Mississippi, 39531, United States
Jackson Pain Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202, United States
Comprehensive Pain & Rehabilitation
Pascagoula, Mississippi, 39581, United States
Midwest Neurosurgery Associates
Kansas City, Missouri, 64132, United States
The Montana Center for Wellness & Pain Management
Kalispell, Montana, 25301, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208, United States
New York Spine & Wellness Center
North Syracuse, New York, 13212, United States
Oklahoma Pain Physicians
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120, United States
NeuroSpine Institute
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
St. Luke's Hospital
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States
Clinical Trials of South Carolina
North Charleston, South Carolina, 29406, United States
Houston Pain Centers
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Utah Spine Care
Ogden, Utah, 84403, United States
The Center for Pain Relief
Charleston, West Virginia, 25301, United States
Related Publications (1)
Slavin KV, North RB, Deer TR, Staats P, Davis K, Diaz R. Tonic and burst spinal cord stimulation waveforms for the treatment of chronic, intractable pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Dec 1;17(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1706-5.
PMID: 27906080DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Roni Diaz, Director Clinical Studies
- Organization
- St. Jude Medical
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Timothy Deer, MD
The Center for Pain Relief
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2013
First Posted
December 13, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 30, 2019
Results First Posted
May 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2019-01