NCT03082248

Brief Summary

Low back pain is a common symptom, which often affects the adult population. Studies show that over the past two decades, costs related to spinal surgery have increased significantly, leading to speculation about what would be motivating this phenomenon. Although expenses with physical therapy treatments and less invasive surgical procedures remained relatively stable, the amount spent with more complex spine surgeries increased exponentially until they became the procedures with the highest costs in healthcare. The criteria for surgical indication are not uniform among surgeons and therefore a study of second opinion in spine surgeries is urgently needed. The present study aims to 1) quantify cost-effectiveness of second opinion for patients with spinal surgery indication 2) evaluate effectiveness of conservative and surgical treatment for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine 3) define objective criteria for indication of conservative and surgical treatment using evidence-based medicine 4) evaluate prognosis of biological markers in the follow-up of patients with lumbar affections 5) evaluate interobserver agreement of physicians in relation to the diagnoses and treatment proposals in patients with diseases of the lumbar spine 6) verify effectiveness of patients who were operated on, compared to patients who were not operated. A prospective cohort study will be conducted, in which patients with an indication of surgical spinal treatment will be evaluated for a second opinion. First evaluation diagnoses and indications for patient treatment will be compared with the second opinion evaluation. All patients who choose to participate on the study will be followed up for a year for evaluations concerning cost-effectiveness, pain, quality of life, function and blood biomarkers. The outcomes will be compared using linear or generalized mixed models and descriptive analyzes of the study population program will be carried out; Statistical agreement will be observed between the first and second opinion and also patient acceptance rates for the treatment proposed in the second indication, evaluating the validity of the project approach. A five-year budget impact analysis will also be carried out, taking into account the population who was eligible for treatment according to the admission flow of a private outpatient setting.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
190

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable low-back-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 3, 2017

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2018

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 22, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 3, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 21, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Low Back PainSurgeryLumbar SpinePhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cost Effectiveness analysis

    EuroQoL will be combined with a Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) to carry out the cost-effectiveness analysis of the second opinion program.

    12 months after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Pain Intensity

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment

  • Change in Disability

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment

  • Change in Global Impression of Recovery

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment

  • Change in Kinesiophobia

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment

  • Change in Psychosocial Risk Prognosis

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Physical Therapy Group

OTHER

10-week supervised physiotherapeutic intervention; all patients will receive educational leaflets and folders for maintenance and adherence to the treatment program.

Other: Physical Therapy

Spinal Surgery Group

OTHER

Surgical procedures and techniques specific for the low back region, previously discussed and agreed upon among surgeons according to patients description.

Procedure: Spinal Surgery

Interventions

Patients allocated to the conservative treatment group will receive physical therapy according to the treatment-based classification approach and also educational leaflets and folders.

Physical Therapy Group

Patients allocated to the surgical procedure group will undergo spinal surgery procedures and techniques specific for the low back region.

Spinal Surgery Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with surgery indication (referred by the health care provider) for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine (basically: intervertebral disc disease, degenerative spondylolisthesis, lumbar canal stenosis, facet low back pain and lumbar instability);
  • no contraindication to general anesthesia or any physiotherapeutic procedure;
  • able to understand Portuguese language and after acceptance of a written consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with:
  • spinal fractures;
  • scoliosis greater than 20 degrees;
  • congenital deformities;
  • spinal tumors;
  • confirmed or suspected pregnancy;
  • history of previous surgery in the spine; and,
  • unable to participate in the follow-up (due to inability to read or complete the required forms).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05652-000, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):656-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.656.

    PMID: 18270354BACKGROUND
  • Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005.

    PMID: 18164449BACKGROUND
  • Healy WL, Peterson RN. Department of Justice investigation of orthopaedic industry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1791-805. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00096. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19571103BACKGROUND
  • Perret D, Rosen C. A physician-driven solution--the Association for Medical Ethics, the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, and ethical challenges in pain medicine. Pain Med. 2011 Sep;12(9):1361-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01217.x.

    PMID: 21914121BACKGROUND
  • Viola DC, Lenza M, Almeida SL, Santos OF, Cendoroglo Neto M, Lottenberg CL, Ferretti M. Spine surgery cost reduction at a specialized treatment center. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jan-Mar;11(1):102-7. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000100018.

    PMID: 23579752BACKGROUND
  • Delitto A, Erhard RE, Bowling RW. A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment. Phys Ther. 1995 Jun;75(6):470-85; discussion 485-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/75.6.470.

    PMID: 7770494BACKGROUND
  • Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Childs JD. Subgrouping patients with low back pain: evolution of a classification approach to physical therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;37(6):290-302. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2498.

    PMID: 17612355BACKGROUND
  • van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, van Tulder MW, de Vet HC. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 1;31(5):578-82. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201293.57439.47.

    PMID: 16508555BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back PainSpinal Injuries

Interventions

Physical Therapy Modalities

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBack InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TherapeuticsRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Mario Ferretti, MD, PhD

    Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2017

First Posted

March 17, 2017

Study Start

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion

December 30, 2018

Study Completion

December 30, 2019

Last Updated

September 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations