Cognitive Functional Therapy Compared to Cognitive Patient Education and Physiotherapy for Patients With Low Back Pain
FAktA
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared to Cognitive Patient Education and Physiotherapy (COPE-PT) for Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain (NSCLBP)
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: There is a need for projects that link work closer to the rehabilitation chain to further understand risk factors for sick-leave. The new aspect of this project is that it combines work place intervention with individualized physiotherapy, based on validated standardized tests and a classification based treatment system. Aim: The aim is to expand the knowledge and understanding of complex causes of musculoskeletal pain, particularly low back pain (LBP). The main aim is to examine if cognitive functional therapy (CFT) can further reduce sick-leave and pain, and increase function and well-being. Material and methods: To ensure good recruitment we have collaboration with the Department for Health and social services in the county of Bergen, which has a sickness absence above average among their health workers. We will invite those with LBP problems to be included in an RCT and receive CFT in a physiotherapy clinic (usually offered 5 to 12 visits). The comparison group will receive a series with cognitive patient education and physiotherapy (COPE-PT) given by a physiotherapist. All participants will be followed by their workplace leaders. All patients who enter the RCT will be re-examined at 3 and 12 months and the predictors for sick-leave, function and coping in different sub-groups of patients with NSLBP will be studied.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Mar 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2019
CompletedMay 16, 2019
May 1, 2019
4.8 years
November 13, 2017
May 14, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sick listing - self reported
Measure if there is a change in self reported sick listing from baseline to after treatment and 12 months follow up
Baseline, after 3 months and after 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Roland Morris
Baseline, 3 months and 12 months
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Baseline, 3 months and 12 months
Hopkins Symptoms Checklist
Baseline, 3 months and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Functional Therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention is a targeted cognitive functional therapy and will be based on examination findings. It is behaviorally directed with a focus on normalizing mal-adaptive pain, cognitive and movement behaviors in a graduated manner. In the evaluation process it is considered whether the patient has adjusted to the back complaints in a positive way (confrontation, active coping, minimal avoidance behavior) or in a negative way (passive coping, fear and avoidance behavior). Work related issues will be a particular focus, with the aim of achieving close co-operation between the worker, the workplace and the worker's responsible health care provider.
Cognitive Patient Education and PT
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention in the second group will receive much training in cognitive coping techniques after the COPE LBP trial principles (Werner et al. 2010). The educational part of the COPE for new instructors with a PT background takes 2 days supervised by Werner and his group, with regular follow-up meeting with the project leaders, together with a psychologist trained in cognitive therapy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- NSLBP for \> 3 months, and reported that their pain was provoked by postures, movement and daily activities.
- Pain intensity measured with a numerical rating scale (NPRS) over the last 14 days \>3/10
- Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) ≥ 7 was necessary to be admitted to the study.
- Ørebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire-short form (ØMPQ-SF) was used to examine the participants risk profile pre-treatment, and had to be ≥ 30, on a scale from 0-100.
You may not qualify if:
- Continuous sick-leave duration ≥ 4 months
- Acute exacerbation of LBP a
- Specific LBP diagnosis - radicular pain, disc herniation, spondylolisthesis, stenosis, Modic changes
- Any low limb surgery in the last 3 months; surgery involving the lumbar spine;
- Pregnancy
- Diagnosed psychiatric disorder
- Active rheumatologic disease, progressive neurological disease
- Serious cardiac or other internal medical condition
- Malignant diseases, acute traumas, infections, or acute vascular catastrophes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Bergen
Bergen, Hordaland, 5018, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2017
First Posted
May 16, 2019
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05