Vaginal Misoprostol Before IUD Insertion in Women With Cesarean Scar
Benefits of Use of 600 Microgram Misoprostol Vaginally Prior To Insertion Of An Intrauterine Device in Patients With Cesarean Scar: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Groups of study: 120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion. Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly. Methodology: All patients were subjected to the following: (i) Complete history taking (ii) Proper counseling: (iv) Examination: (v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist . (vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology . A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution. The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection. The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange. The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn a short distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus . The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedNovember 6, 2017
November 1, 2017
7 months
March 10, 2017
November 1, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain score
Pain scores were measured by Visual analogue scale (VAS) consists of 10 cm horizontal straight line with 2 ends At 0 end there was no pain and at 10 there was a severe pain
At time of insertion
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Difficulty of insertion of IUD in both groups
At time of insertion
side effects
from time of administration till insertion
Study Arms (2)
Misoprostol group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.
placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORSixty women received the placebo vaginally six hours before IUD insertion. Placebo is the same in size, color and shape to misoprostol.
Interventions
600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion
bimanual examination. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution. The Next step was to sound The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange. The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with previous cesarean section and with no previous vaginal delivery attending outpatient clinic for IUD insertion
You may not qualify if:
- contraindications for misoprostol use (pregnancy and prostaglandin allergy).
- contraindications for IUD use (gynecologic malignancy, pelvic inflammatory disease and unexplained vaginal bleeding).
- previous vaginal delivery. And (4) medical disorders as diabetes, hypertension and bleeding tendency .
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Kasr Alainy medical school
Cairo, 12151, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed Maged
Kasr Alainy medical school
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2017
First Posted
March 16, 2017
Study Start
April 11, 2017
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share