NCT03081442

Brief Summary

Groups of study: 120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion. Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly. Methodology: All patients were subjected to the following: (i) Complete history taking (ii) Proper counseling: (iv) Examination: (v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist . (vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology . A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution. The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection. The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange. The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn a short distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus . The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2017

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2017

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 11, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 6, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

March 10, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 1, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain score

    Pain scores were measured by Visual analogue scale (VAS) consists of 10 cm horizontal straight line with 2 ends At 0 end there was no pain and at 10 there was a severe pain

    At time of insertion

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Difficulty of insertion of IUD in both groups

    At time of insertion

  • side effects

    from time of administration till insertion

Study Arms (2)

Misoprostol group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.

Drug: MisoprostolDevice: Intrauterine contraceptive device IUCD

placebo group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Sixty women received the placebo vaginally six hours before IUD insertion. Placebo is the same in size, color and shape to misoprostol.

Device: Intrauterine contraceptive device IUCD

Interventions

600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion

Also known as: cytotec
Misoprostol group

bimanual examination. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution. The Next step was to sound The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange. The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .

Also known as: TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India
Misoprostol groupplacebo group

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 44 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Women with previous cesarean section and with no previous vaginal delivery attending outpatient clinic for IUD insertion

You may not qualify if:

  • contraindications for misoprostol use (pregnancy and prostaglandin allergy).
  • contraindications for IUD use (gynecologic malignancy, pelvic inflammatory disease and unexplained vaginal bleeding).
  • previous vaginal delivery. And (4) medical disorders as diabetes, hypertension and bleeding tendency .

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kasr Alainy medical school

Cairo, 12151, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

MisoprostolIntrauterine Devices

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological FactorsContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptive DevicesEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Ahmed Maged

    Kasr Alainy medical school

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2017

First Posted

March 16, 2017

Study Start

April 11, 2017

Primary Completion

November 1, 2017

Study Completion

November 1, 2017

Last Updated

November 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations