Long-Term Outcome of Pediatric Traumatic Wound Repair: Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
Long-term Outcome of the Primary Wound Repair of Traumatic Skin Lacerations in the Head Area in Pediatric Patients: Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
1 other identifier
observational
386
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project is an observational trial investigating wound cosmetic appearance after repair of traumatic skin lacerations in the head area of pediatric patients with two different approaches to skin closure: sutures versus tissue adhesive. Photographs will be taken at two follow-up visits after repair and later assessed by external blinded plastic surgeon using standard cosmetic assessment scales. The investigators hypothesize that cosmetic wound outcome will be equivalent in these two wound repair treatment options.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 13, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2019
CompletedAugust 28, 2019
August 1, 2019
2.1 years
March 9, 2017
August 23, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cosmetic scar appearance
Cosmetic appearance will be assessed using the modified Patient and Observer Scar Measurement Score
second follow-up visit: 6 till 12 months after wound repair
Study Arms (2)
Suture
Wound repair with suture
Tissue adhesive
Wound repair with tissue adhesive
Eligibility Criteria
Pediatric patients after completion of a primary wound repair treatment with suture or tissue adhesive in the Pediatric Emergency Unit
You may qualify if:
- till16 years of age
- Any primary wound repair treatment of a laceration caused by trauma and involving the skin of the head area
- Patient or caregiver must be able to understand and sign an informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing conditions that affect wound healing adversely
- Patients who demonstrate severe or life-threatening injuries
- Patients / caregivers with communication / logistic barriers that would make them unfit to provide informed consent or to attend the follow-up visits
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's University Hospital of Zurich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8032, Switzerland
Related Publications (9)
Farion K, Osmond MH, Hartling L, Russell K, Klassen T, Crumley E, Wiebe N. Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003326.
PMID: 12137689BACKGROUNDSinger AJ, Hollander JE, Quinn JV. Evaluation and management of traumatic lacerations. N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 16;337(16):1142-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710163371607. No abstract available.
PMID: 9329936BACKGROUNDIdriss N, Maibach HI. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview. Skin Res Technol. 2009 Feb;15(1):1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00327.x.
PMID: 19152571BACKGROUNDFearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.
PMID: 20596233BACKGROUNDFearmonti RM, Bond JE, Erdmann D, Levin LS, Pizzo SV, Levinson H. The modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: a novel approach to defining pathologic and nonpathologic scarring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan;127(1):242-247. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f959e8.
PMID: 21200219BACKGROUNDBrown BC, Moss TP, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun;63(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
PMID: 19501559BACKGROUNDLewis-Jones MS, Finlay AY. The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): initial validation and practical use. Br J Dermatol. 1995 Jun;132(6):942-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb16953.x.
PMID: 7662573BACKGROUNDOlsen JR, Gallacher J, Finlay AY, Piguet V, Francis NA. Quality of life impact of childhood skin conditions measured using the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2016 Apr;174(4):853-61. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14361. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
PMID: 26686685BACKGROUNDFontana S, Schiestl CM, Landolt MA, Staubli G, von Salis S, Neuhaus K, Mohr C, Elrod J. A Prospective Controlled Study on Long-Term Outcomes of Facial Lacerations in Children. Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 12;8:616151. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.616151. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33643965DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Clemens M Schiestl, PD
Children's University Hospital of Zurich
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2017
First Posted
March 15, 2017
Study Start
June 13, 2017
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
July 31, 2019
Last Updated
August 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08