NCT03079375

Brief Summary

Background It is well known that the transfer of a patient from hospital to the general practitioner is related with mistakes in the medication of the patient. A report from 2006 measure the number of drug related admissions in Denmark to be 69.000 to 162.000 per year. To reduce these mistakes, more and better communication between the health professionals are suggested. Furthermore medication reviews made by pharmacist seems to reduce the number of drug related readmissions and other drug related issues, which can lead to an economic cost reduction. Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of medication review and better communication between the health professionals after discharge of a patient from hospital to the general practitioner. The effect is measured as reducing the number of readmissions and number of visits at the emergency department 30 days and six month after inclusion of the patient. Method This study was estimated to include 1500 participants. The patients were randomized to one of three groups; usual care, basic intervention or extended intervention. The usual care received the normal care following the Danish standard procedure. The basic intervention had a medication review by a clinical pharmacist during admission. The extended interventions group was similar to the basic intervention group plus follow-up with the patient, the general practitioner and if relevant the nursing home and pharmacy one week and six month after discharge by interview with the clinical pharmacist.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,499

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 24, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 24, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2017

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2017

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 2, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

December 2, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2017

Results QC Date

September 11, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 11, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

cross sectionalmedication reviewreadmissionsfollow-up

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Readmissions

    number of patients who have been readmitted

    30 days

  • Admissions

    number of patients who have been admitted

    180 days

  • Emergency Department Visits

    number of patients who have emergency department visits

    180 days

  • Composite Endpoint, Admissions or Emergency Department Visits

    number of patients who experience primary composite endpoint, admissions or emergency department visits within 6 month

    180 days

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Drug-related Admissions

    180 days after the inclusion date

  • Drug-related Readmissions

    30 days after the inclusion date

  • Percentage of Medication Changes Accepted by GPs

    up to 180 days

  • Medication Review Changes Accepted by Physicians (in Hospital)

    1 month

  • Mortality

    180 days after the inclusion date

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

usual care

NO INTERVENTION

no pharmaceutical intervention.

basic intervention

SHAM COMPARATOR

Medication review

Other: basic intervention

extended intervention

SHAM COMPARATOR

medication review, medication interview before discharge and follow-up with patient, GP and if relevant pharmacy and nursing home.

Other: extended intervention

Interventions

medication review

basic intervention

medication review, medication interview before discharge and follow-up

extended intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Usual medicine of five drugs or above
  • Speak and understand Danish
  • Admitted via the Acute Medicine Admission Ward
  • Are able to give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients included in a similar study
  • Declared terminal
  • Suicidal
  • In custody
  • Isolated at the hospital
  • Im- and/or expressive aphasia
  • Severe dementia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Ravn-Nielsen LV, Duckert ML, Lund ML, Henriksen JP, Nielsen ML, Eriksen CS, Buck TC, Pottegard A, Hansen MR, Hallas J. Effect of an In-Hospital Multifaceted Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on the Risk of Readmission: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):375-382. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8274.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Lene V. Ravn-Nielsen clinical pharmacist
Organization
OdenseUH

Study Officials

  • Lene V. Ravn-Nielsen, M.Sc.Pharm

    Hospital Pharmacy of Funen

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The study is double blinded. The pharmacist do not know, whether the patient is randomized to the basic or to the extended intervention before they conduct the medication review. That is why the patients in the intervention group are randomized two times.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: The combination of pharmacist interventions are compared with medication review alone in comparison to non-intervention (a control group).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical pharmacist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2017

First Posted

March 14, 2017

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 24, 2015

Study Completion

October 24, 2015

Last Updated

December 2, 2019

Results First Posted

December 2, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Only during data analysis between clinical pharmacists. Personal identification number is converted to an anonymous identification number.