NCT03071783

Brief Summary

The objective of the clinical investigation is to test whether intra-operative traction force feed back during vacuum extraction leads to a significant decrease in incidence of brain damage in neonates. By randomization, half of the vacuum extraction patients will be assigned to delivery using a new intelligent handle for vacuum extractions, and half will be assigned to conventional method without traction force measurement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
800

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

March 7, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2017

Last Update Submit

March 6, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Composite neonatal brain damage

    Composite consists of: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), seizures, perinatal mortality and subgaleal hematoma as routinely diagnosed in patient chart

    From start of extraction through 28 days after delivery (or until discharge from the hospital)

Study Arms (2)

Vacuum extraction intelligent system

EXPERIMENTAL

Measurement and intra-operative feed back of vacuum extraction data: notification signal based an algorithm calculation using traction force (peak and time force integral) and time.

Device: Vacuum extraction intelligent system

conventional

NO INTERVENTION

conventional handle

Interventions

Vacuum extraction intelligent system - this is the intervention

Vacuum extraction intelligent system

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Medical or social reasons for vacuum extraction with a metal cup, gestational age ≥37+0 weeks, singleton, cephalic

You may not qualify if:

  • Multiple pregnancy, breech presentation, gestational age \<37+0

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, 14186, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • MALMSTROM T. The vacuum extractor, an obstetrical instrument. I. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1957;36(suppl 3):5-50. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13497632BACKGROUND
  • Moolgaoker AS, Ahamed SO, Payne PR. A comparison of different methods of instrumental delivery based on electronic measurements of compression and traction. Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Sep;54(3):299-309.

    PMID: 471369BACKGROUND
  • Towner DR, Ciotti MC. Operative vaginal delivery: a cause of birth injury or is it? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;50(3):563-81. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31811eaa39.

    PMID: 17762410BACKGROUND
  • Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Rutter S, Smith MF, Sprigg A, Ohadike P, Davies NP, Rigby AS, Paley MN. Frequency and natural history of subdural haemorrhages in babies and relation to obstetric factors. Lancet. 2004 Mar 13;363(9412):846-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15730-9.

    PMID: 15031028BACKGROUND
  • Pettersson K, Ajne J, Yousaf K, Sturm D, Westgren M, Ajne G. Traction force during vacuum extraction: a prospective observational study. BJOG. 2015 Dec;122(13):1809-16. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13222. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

  • Romero S, Pettersson K, Yousaf K, Westgren M, Ajne G. Perinatal outcome after vacuum assisted delivery with digital feedback on traction force; a randomised controlled study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 26;21(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03604-z.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain IschemiaCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesHypoxia, BrainVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHypoxiaSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Magnus Westgren, Professor

    Karolinska Institutet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2017

First Posted

March 7, 2017

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 15, 2018

Study Completion

June 15, 2018

Last Updated

March 7, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Locations