NCT03070873

Brief Summary

The investigators designed a prospective study in this article to evaluate the efficacy, the life quality and the complications of two different meshes of type I (one is Perigee/Apogee, the other is named Gynecare prolift) versus traditional surgery, and also studied the influence of some surgical procedures on the prognosis.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
258

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2014

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 15, 2017

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 6, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

February 15, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 28, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Quality of lifeVaginal meshMesh complications

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification

    the prolapse of stage II and above is defined as recurrence in POP-Q stage.

    at 12 months after surgery

  • sexual quality of life through the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire

    PISQ-12

    at 12 months after surgery

  • pelvic floor distress inventory short form

    PFDI-20

    at 12 months after surgery

  • mesh exposure

    mesh was seen in the vagina by gynecological examination

    at 12 months after surgery

  • sexual quality of life through the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire

    PISQ-12

    at 24 months after surgery

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification

    the prolapse of stage II and above is defined as recurrence in POP-Q stage.

    at 24 months after surgery

  • pelvic floor distress inventory short form

    PFDI-20

    at 24 months after surgery

  • mesh exposure

    mesh was seen in the vagina by gynecological examination

    at 24 months after surgery

  • sexual quality of life through the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire

    PISQ-12

    baseline

  • pelvic floor distress inventory short form

    PFDI-20

    baseline

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • stress urinary incontinence

    at 1 months after surgery

  • stress urinary incontinence

    3 months after surgery

  • Volume of bleeding

    during the operation

  • Elevated blood pressure

    during the operation

  • Day of postoperative indwelling catheter

    1 months after surgery

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

group A

EXPERIMENTAL

accepted Perigee and Apogee mesh(PA)

Device: Perigee and Apogee Mesh

group B

EXPERIMENTAL

accepted Gynecare prolift mesh

Device: Gynecare Prolift Mesh

group C

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Traditional surgery without any mesh

Procedure: Traditional Surgery

Interventions

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

group A

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

group B

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

group C

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 85 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with stage III \~ IV degree of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse and uterine prolapse (total pelvic floor prolapse) by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) were included

You may not qualify if:

  • Simple anterior or posterior wall prolapse, simple uterine prolapse, combined with stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder (OAB), pelvic floor repair surgery history and recurrent patients
  • Local or systemic conditions that would preclude surgery or affect healing such as restricted leg motion (inability to conform to the lithotomy position)
  • Vaginal bleeding;coagulation disorders
  • Infection,or uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus
  • Pelvic cancer and radiation to the pelvic area in the previous 6 months.
  • Also women of reproductive age, and planning of pregnancy were also excluded for mesh usage.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Yu-Fei Shen

    director of Gynecology Department , Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
In the study the operation was performed by three surgeons, the patients received surgery by the doctor when the patients saw in the outpatient clinic.
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups: The group A was a total of 91 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and total pelvic floor reconstruction combined Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA); The group B was a total of 97 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh; The group C was a total of 70 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair without any mesh.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Vice president of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2017

First Posted

March 6, 2017

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

January 30, 2014

Study Completion

January 30, 2014

Last Updated

March 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share