Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift
mesh
1 other identifier
interventional
258
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The investigators designed a prospective study in this article to evaluate the efficacy, the life quality and the complications of two different meshes of type I (one is Perigee/Apogee, the other is named Gynecare prolift) versus traditional surgery, and also studied the influence of some surgical procedures on the prognosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2017
CompletedMarch 6, 2017
February 1, 2017
4.1 years
February 15, 2017
February 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
the prolapse of stage II and above is defined as recurrence in POP-Q stage.
at 12 months after surgery
sexual quality of life through the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire
PISQ-12
at 12 months after surgery
pelvic floor distress inventory short form
PFDI-20
at 12 months after surgery
mesh exposure
mesh was seen in the vagina by gynecological examination
at 12 months after surgery
sexual quality of life through the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire
PISQ-12
at 24 months after surgery
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
the prolapse of stage II and above is defined as recurrence in POP-Q stage.
at 24 months after surgery
pelvic floor distress inventory short form
PFDI-20
at 24 months after surgery
mesh exposure
mesh was seen in the vagina by gynecological examination
at 24 months after surgery
sexual quality of life through the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire
PISQ-12
baseline
pelvic floor distress inventory short form
PFDI-20
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (6)
stress urinary incontinence
at 1 months after surgery
stress urinary incontinence
3 months after surgery
Volume of bleeding
during the operation
Elevated blood pressure
during the operation
Day of postoperative indwelling catheter
1 months after surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
group A
EXPERIMENTALaccepted Perigee and Apogee mesh(PA)
group B
EXPERIMENTALaccepted Gynecare prolift mesh
group C
PLACEBO COMPARATORTraditional surgery without any mesh
Interventions
The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.
The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.
The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with stage III \~ IV degree of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse and uterine prolapse (total pelvic floor prolapse) by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) were included
You may not qualify if:
- Simple anterior or posterior wall prolapse, simple uterine prolapse, combined with stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder (OAB), pelvic floor repair surgery history and recurrent patients
- Local or systemic conditions that would preclude surgery or affect healing such as restricted leg motion (inability to conform to the lithotomy position)
- Vaginal bleeding;coagulation disorders
- Infection,or uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus
- Pelvic cancer and radiation to the pelvic area in the previous 6 months.
- Also women of reproductive age, and planning of pregnancy were also excluded for mesh usage.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yu-Fei Shen
director of Gynecology Department , Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- In the study the operation was performed by three surgeons, the patients received surgery by the doctor when the patients saw in the outpatient clinic.
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vice president of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2017
First Posted
March 6, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 30, 2014
Study Completion
January 30, 2014
Last Updated
March 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share