The Extended Operations And Pelvic Muscle Training In The Management Of Apical Support Loss Study
E-OPTIMAL
Long-Term Effectiveness Of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligament Suspension With and Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy/Pelvic Muscle Training: Extended Operations & Pelvic Muscle Training Of Apical Support Loss Study
1 other identifier
interventional
285
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Women will be invited to participate in E-OPTIMAL at their last clinical follow-up visit for OPTIMAL (at 24 months post surgery). E-OPTIMAL is an extension of the ongoing OPTIMAL study and no new study treatment interventions will be given. Rather an enrollment intervention will be investigated with potential E-OPTIMAL participants randomly assigned to watch a standardized video prior to consent or undergo the standard informed consent process. The standardized video will review the rationale for women's health research, the importance of long-term follow-up and a detailed invitation to participate in E-OPTIMAL. The video has undergone review by potential subjects, coordinators and physician researchers to ensure that the relevance and importance of issues potentially impacting on long-term participation in studies such as E-OPTIMAL are covered. Participation in E-OPTIMAL will occur up to three additional years. Women will be strongly encouraged to participate in annual examinations and annual telephone surveys but may participate in only one of these study parts if needed. We propose to test the following null hypotheses:
- 1.There will be no difference in time to surgical failure between uterosacral vaginal vault ligament suspension (ULS) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) up to 5 years after surgery.
- 2.The addition of a standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for POP to the informed consent process will not improve enrollment or retention in E-OPTIMAL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 28, 2020
CompletedSeptember 28, 2020
September 1, 2020
6.3 years
July 19, 2010
May 5, 2020
September 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Surgical Failure
Surgical failure was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C descended more than one-third of total vaginal length; POPQ points Aa, Ba, Ap, or Bp were beyond the hymen; bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms were reported by the participant; or the participant received retreatment. The apex is point C (cervix), and posteriorly is point D (pouch of Douglas). In women after hysterectomy, point C is the vaginal cuff and point D is omitted. This outcome measure is cumulatively across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)
6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Recruitment Into E-OPTIMAL
Eligible OPTIMAL participants were to receive a video (or no video) about the importance of follow-up in clinical trials. The outcome is measured as the number of OPTIMAL participants that consented to participate in E-OPTIMAL.
At 24 Months post OPTIMAL Treatment
Retention in E-OPTIMAL
Retention is defined as those participants who consented to participate in E-OPTIMAL that remained in the E-OPTIMAL study (i.e. completed follow-up visits and were not otherwise dropped from the study).
3, 4, and 5 Years Post OPTIMAL Treatment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Anatomic Failure
6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Bothersome Bulge Symptoms
6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Retreatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Other Outcomes (18)
Number of Participants With Granulation Tissue
2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Number of Participants With Suture Exposure
2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Number of Participants With Midurethral Sling Erosion or Exposure
2, 3, 4, and 5 years
- +15 more other outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Enrollment video arm
EXPERIMENTALArm of subjects that will be shown a standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for pelvic organ prolapse prior to the informed consent process.
No video intervention arm
NO INTERVENTIONThis group of subjects will not view a standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for pelvic organ prolapse prior to the informed consent process.
ULS
EXPERIMENTALUterosacral Ligament Suspension was one of the randomized surgical treatments in the OPTIMAL study
SSLF
EXPERIMENTALSacrospinous Ligament Fixation was one of the randomized surgical treatments in the OPTIMAL study.
PMT
EXPERIMENTALPerioperative Behavioral Therapy/Pelvic Muscle Training was one of the randomized non-surgical (behavioral) interventions in the OPTIMAL study.
Usual Care
OTHERNo Perioperative Behavioral Therapy/Pelvic Muscle Training (i.e., usual care) was one of the randomized non-surgical (behavioral) interventions in the OPTIMAL study.
Interventions
Standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for pelvic organ prolapse prior to the informed consent process
perioperative behavioral therapy / pelvic muscle training with formal individualized PMT program that begins two to four weeks prior to surgery and continues for three months after surgery
usual care both before and after prolapse surgery with respect to pelvic muscle training
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Completion of the Year 2 OPTIMAL in-person visit
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Subjects who are long-term residents of a skilled nursing facility (that is, residency is not limited to short-term rehabilitation) at the time of enrollment into E-OPTIMAL. Note: Subjects unable to return for annual visits are not excluded as they can participate in the telephone interview. However, every attempt will be made to encourage in-person participation.
- Criteria for termination of participation:
- (Due to evidence or likelihood that the subject can no longer consent for herself)
- Subjects 75 years and older that fail the telephone mini-mental status examination. If the participant gets 5 or more of the 10 items "incorrect" the interviewer says "thank you very much for your time, that completes the interview for today." In other words, the interviewer in no way implies to the participant that they did not "pass" a test to continue. The interviewer contacts the appropriate site coordinator immediately after the interview to let them know of the outcome.
- Subjects younger than 75 who appear to have cognitive deficits during the quality of life telephone interview will be administered the mini-mental status examination; those who fail will be excluded from further participation. (Proxy respondents will not be used.) Subjects who appear to have cognitive deficits during the in-person visit or site telephone interview will be withdrawn from the study by the study coordinator.
- Subjects who become long-term residents of a skilled nursing facility.
- Withdrawal of consent. Verbal assent will be obtained prior to each telephone interview and each in-person visit.
- Note: Subjects that are unable to complete telephone interviews (for example, because of hearing loss) may complete the interview portion of the survey in person, either at the site or in the home.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249, United States
University of California, San Diego Medical Center
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Related Publications (4)
Jakus-Waldman S, Brubaker L, Jelovsek JE, Schaffer JI, Ellington DR, Mazloomdoost D, Whitworth R, Gantz MG; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN). Risk Factors for Surgical Failure and Worsening Pelvic Floor Symptoms Within 5 Years After Vaginal Prolapse Repair. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):933-941. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004092.
PMID: 33030871DERIVEDMeyer I, Whitworth RE, Lukacz ES, Smith AL, Sung VW, Visco AG, Ackenbom MF, Wai CY, Mazloomdoost D, Gantz MG, Richter HE; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2155-2164. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04271-y. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
PMID: 32146521DERIVEDBrubaker L, Jelovsek JE, Lukacz ES, Balgobin S, Ballard A, Weidner AC, Gantz MG, Whitworth R, Mazloomdoost D; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Recruitment and retention: A randomized controlled trial of video-enhanced versus standard consent processes within the E-OPTIMAL study. Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;16(5):481-489. doi: 10.1177/1740774519865541. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
PMID: 31347384DERIVEDJelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE, Weidner A, Menefee S, Schaffer J, Pugh N, Meikle S; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827.
PMID: 29677302DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Marie Gantz
- Organization
- RTI International
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew D. Barber, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Jelovsek, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2010
First Posted
July 21, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 28, 2020
Results First Posted
September 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share