CiPA Phase 1 ECG Biomarker Validation Study
Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) Clinical Phase 1 ECG Biomarker Validation Study (CiPA Phase 1 ECG Biomarker Study)
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will assess whether exposure response analysis of the electrocardiographic QTc and J-Tpeakc intervals in Phase 1 clinical pharmacology studies can be used to confirm that drugs that predominantly block the potassium channel encoded by the human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) with approximately equipotent late sodium and/or calcium block ("balanced ion channel" drugs) do not cause J-Tpeakc prolongation and that drugs that predominantly block hERG without late sodium or L-type calcium current block ("predominant hERG" drugs) cause QTc prolongation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 26, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 18, 2020
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
3 months
February 27, 2017
June 27, 2018
January 15, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline J-Tpeakc With "Balanced Ion Channel" Drugs (Ranolazine, Verapamil, Lopinavir / Ritonavir)
The primary outcome measure for the "balanced ion channel" drugs (ranolazine, verapamil, lopinavir / ritonavir) is for the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) to be \<10 msec for the projected placebo-corrected change from baseline J-Tpeakc effect at the peak plasma level on Day 3 using a linear mixed-effects exposure response model. Placebo drug concentration was set to 0 (see SAP).
3 days
Change From Baseline QTc With "Predominant hERG" Blocking Drug (Chloroquine)
The primary outcome measure for the "predominant hERG" drug (chloroquine) is for the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% CI to be ≥10 msec for the projected placebo-corrected change from baseline QTc effect at the peak plasma level on Day 1 using a linear mixed-effects exposure response model
3 days
QTc Shortening From Calcium Block (Diltiazem) in the Presence of hERG Block (Dofetilide)
* It will be assessed whether the projected QTc effect of dofetilide alone is significantly greater (i.e., p\<0.05) than the projected QTc effect of the combination of dofetilide + diltiazem. This will be assessed at the dofetilide peak plasma level on Day 3 (computed from the combination of dofetilide + diltiazem) on the pooled dofetilide alone, diltiazem alone, and dofetilide + diltiazem data using a linear mixed effects model. * Subsequently, and if the test is significant for QTc, the same test will be performed to assess calcium block (diltiazem) effects on J-Tpeakc.
3 days
Study Arms (6)
Ranolazine
ACTIVE COMPARATORRanolazine 1500 mg two times per day for 2.5 days
Verapamil
ACTIVE COMPARATORVerapamil 120 mg immediate release (IR) morning and afternoon doses on Days 1 and 2, 240 mg extended release (ER) evening dose on Days 1 and 2, and 120 mg IR morning dose on Day 3
Lopinavir / Ritonavir
ACTIVE COMPARATORLopinavir / Ritonavir 800 mg / 200 mg two times per day for 2.5 days
Chloroquine
ACTIVE COMPARATORChloroquine 1000 mg on Day 1, 500 mg on Day 2, 1000 mg on Day 3
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo capsules
Dofetilide and Diltiazem
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn one period subjects receive Dofetilide 0.125 mg on Day 1, 0.375 mg on Day 3. In a second period (randomized cross-over) subject receive Diltiazem 120 mg IR morning dose on Day 8, 240 mg ER evening dose on Days 8 and 9, and 120 mg IR on Day 10 with coadministration of 0.25 mg dofetilide on Day 10.
Interventions
Verapamil 120 mg immediate release (IR) morning and afternoon doses on Days 1 and 2, 240 mg extended release (ER) evening dose on Days 1 and 2, and 120 mg IR morning dose on Day 3 (all oral doses)
Lopinavir / Ritonavir 800 mg / 200 mg orally two times per day for 2.5 days
Chloroquine 1000 mg on Day 1, 500 mg on Day 2, 1000 mg on Day 3 (all oral doses)
In one period subjects receive Dofetilide 0.125 mg on Day 1, 0.375 mg on Day 3. In a second period (randomized cross-over) subject receive Diltiazem 120 mg IR morning dose on Day 8, 240 mg ER evening dose on Days 8 and 9, and 120 mg IR on Day 10 with coadministration of 0.25 mg dofetilide on Day 10.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject signs an institutional review board (IRB) approved written informed consent and privacy language as per national regulations (e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act \[HIPAA\] authorization) before any study related procedures are performed.
- Subject is a healthy man or woman, 18 to 50 years of age, inclusive, who weighs at least 50 kg (110 pounds) and has a body mass index of 18 to 30 kg/m2, inclusive, at Screening.
- Subject has normal medical history findings, clinical laboratory results, vital sign measurements, 12 lead ECG results, and physical examination findings at Screening or, if abnormal, the abnormality is not considered clinically significant (as determined and documented by the investigator or designee).
- Female subjects will be at least 2 years postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing 2 highly effective methods of birth control (as determined by the investigator or designee; one of the methods must be a barrier technique).
- Female subjects must not be pregnant or lactating before enrollment in the study.
- Male or female subjects must agree to practice 2 highly effective methods of birth control (as determined by the investigator or designee; one of the methods must be a barrier technique) from Screening until 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Subject is highly likely (as determined by the investigator) to comply with the protocol defined procedures and to complete the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a safety 12 lead ECG result at Screening or Check in with evidence of any of the following abnormalities:
- QTc using Fridericia correction (QTcF) \>430 msec
- PR interval \>220 msec or \<120 msec
- QRS duration \>110 msec
- Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block
- Complete left or right bundle branch block or incomplete right bundle branch block
- Heart rate \<50 or \>90 beats per minute
- Pathological Q-waves (defined as Q wave \>40 msec)
- Ventricular pre-excitation
- Subject has more than 12 ectopic beats during the 3 hour Holter ECG at Screening.
- Subject has a history of unexplained syncope, structural heart disease, long QT syndrome, heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina, unexplained cardiac arrhythmia, torsade de pointes, ventricular tachycardia, or placement of a pacemaker or implantable defibrillator. Subjects will also be excluded if there is a family history of long QT syndrome (genetically proven or suggested by sudden death of a close relative due to cardiac causes at a young age) or Brugada syndrome.
- Subject has a history or current evidence of any clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) cardiovascular, dermatologic, endocrine, gastrointestinal, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic, neurologic, psychiatric, pulmonary, renal, urologic, and/or other major disease or malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer). The investigator may allow exceptions to these criteria (e.g., cholecystectomy, childhood asthma) following discussion with the medical monitor.
- Subject has a history of thoracic surgery.
- Subject has any condition possibly affecting study drug absorption (e.g., gastrectomy, Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndrome).
- Subject has a skin condition likely to compromise ECG electrode placement.
- +17 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Spaulding Clinical Research
West Bend, Wisconsin, 53095, United States
Related Publications (3)
Vicente J, Zusterzeel R, Johannesen L, Mason J, Sager P, Patel V, Matta MK, Li Z, Liu J, Garnett C, Stockbridge N, Zineh I, Strauss DG. Mechanistic Model-Informed Proarrhythmic Risk Assessment of Drugs: Review of the "CiPA" Initiative and Design of a Prospective Clinical Validation Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;103(1):54-66. doi: 10.1002/cpt.896. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
PMID: 28986934BACKGROUNDVicente J. Update on the ECG component of the CiPA initiative. J Electrocardiol. 2018 Nov-Dec;51(6S):S98-S102. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
PMID: 30121123BACKGROUNDVicente J, Zusterzeel R, Johannesen L, Ochoa-Jimenez R, Mason JW, Sanabria C, Kemp S, Sager PT, Patel V, Matta MK, Liu J, Florian J, Garnett C, Stockbridge N, Strauss DG. Assessment of Multi-Ion Channel Block in a Phase I Randomized Study Design: Results of the CiPA Phase I ECG Biomarker Validation Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Apr;105(4):943-953. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1303. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
PMID: 30447156RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jose Vicente, PhD
- Organization
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Sanabria, MD
Spaulding Clinical Research LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2017
First Posted
March 3, 2017
Study Start
March 14, 2017
Primary Completion
June 26, 2017
Study Completion
June 26, 2017
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Results First Posted
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- January 2018: Study protocol and SAP (doi: 10.1002/cpt.896). August 2018: ECG analysis plan (doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.003). December 2018: Annotated ECG waveforms and clinical data database (https://physionet.org/physiobank/database/ecgcipa/) December 2018: Study results report published (doi: 10.1002/cpt.1303)
- Access Criteria
- Open access
Study protocol and statistical analysis plan released as supplementary materials together with study design and rationale manuscript. ECG analysis plan published together with an update of the CiPA initiative. Annotated ECG waveforms, pharmacokinetic, and other subject level clinical data released as ECGCIPA database in PhysioNet. Clinical study report and analytic code released as supporting information (i.e., study results report) of study results manuscript. See references section.