Can Hybrid PET-MRI Differentiate Between Radiation Effects and Disease Progression?

NCT03068520 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: 022-16-ASMC
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 140
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

PET-MRI scanning regarding amino acid metabolic profile, functional and morphological details will be performed on set intervals to patients with brain tumor \& brain metastases in order to try to optimize the study protocol, distinguish between pseudo-response to anti-angiogenic therapy and tumor progression, and most importantly try to distinguish between progressive tumor and treatment related effects.3 cohort of patients will be included in the study.

Conditions

Brain Tumor

Keywords

PET; MRI; BRAIN METASTASIS; BRAIN PRIMARY TUMOR; RESPONSE TO TREATMENT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Distinguish between progressive tumor and treatment related effects

  finding PET-MRI difference between progression and treatment effect correlating with clinical out come

  1st scan: after surgery or biopsy and before any further treatment - 2nd scan: up to 4 weeks after completing the combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimen. - 3rd and 4th scans - 3 month interval apart

Study Arms (3)

PRIMARY BRAIN TUMOR (PBT)

OTHER

patients with PBT (Glioblastoma, Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma, Anaplastic Oligoastrocytoma), before treatment with radiation and chemotherapy.will be followed with PET MRI

Diagnostic Test: PET MR

METASTATIC BT TREATED BY SRS

OTHER

patients with lung or breast metastasis to brain treated by SRS in which at least one lesion showed deterioration by MR performed after treatment. will be followed with PET MRI

Diagnostic Test: PET MR

METASTATIC BT NOT TREATED BY SRS

OTHER

patients with lung or breast metastasis to brain where the SRS treatment was postponed for clinical reasons (getting mutation information for targeted treatment) the lesion size measures 5-40 mm. will be followed with PET MRI

Diagnostic Test: PET MR

Interventions

PET MR DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

PET MR with 18 Fluorodopa (\[18F\]-DOPA) will be performed on patient at set intervals

METASTATIC BT NOT TREATED BY SRS; METASTATIC BT TREATED BY SRS; PRIMARY BRAIN TUMOR (PBT)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 70 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Subject with glial brain tumors,
• Subjects with metastatic brain tumors that were treated with stereotactic radiation (SRS), \* Subjects with metastatic brain tumors which were not treated

You may not qualify if:

• glial tumor with no histological diagnosis
• non breast of lung metastasis
• non compliance
• unable to lay still during the scanning
• mri non
• renal failure/gadolinium sensitivity
• less than 5 mm metastatic tumors
• bleeding brain tumors
• pregnancy

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Assuta Medical Center: lead
• Rabin Medical Center: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Assuta Medical Centers

Tel Aviv, Israel

RECRUITING

Related Publications (21)

• Horky LL, Treves ST. PET and SPECT in brain tumors and epilepsy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011 Apr;22(2):169-84, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2010.12.003.

  PMID: 21435569 BACKGROUND

• Chen W, Silverman DH, Delaloye S, Czernin J, Kamdar N, Pope W, Satyamurthy N, Schiepers C, Cloughesy T. 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. J Nucl Med. 2006 Jun;47(6):904-11.

  PMID: 16741298 BACKGROUND

• Momose T, Nariai T, Kawabe T, Inaji M, Tanaka Y, Watanabe S, Maehara T, Oda K, Ishii K, Ishiwata K, Yamamoto M. Clinical benefit of 11C methionine PET imaging as a planning modality for radiosurgery of previously irradiated recurrent brain metastases. Clin Nucl Med. 2014 Nov;39(11):939-43. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000561.

  PMID: 25140562 BACKGROUND

• Nanni C, Fanti S, Rubello D. 18F-DOPA PET and PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2007 Oct;48(10):1577-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.041947. No abstract available.

  PMID: 17909255 BACKGROUND

• Verma N, Cowperthwaite MC, Burnett MG, Markey MK. Differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment necrosis: a review of neuro-oncologic imaging strategies. Neuro Oncol. 2013 May;15(5):515-34. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos307. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

  PMID: 23325863 BACKGROUND

• Tudisca C, Nasoodi A, Fraioli F. PET-MRI: clinical application of the new hybrid technology. Nucl Med Commun. 2015 Jul;36(7):666-78. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000312.

  PMID: 25830717 BACKGROUND

• Kondziolka D, Patel A, Lunsford LD, Kassam A, Flickinger JC. Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Sep 1;45(2):427-34. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00198-4.

  PMID: 10487566 BACKGROUND

• Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, Nakagawa K, Toyoda T, Hatano K, Kenjyo M, Oya N, Hirota S, Shioura H, Kunieda E, Inomata T, Hayakawa K, Katoh N, Kobashi G. Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2483-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2483.

  PMID: 16757720 BACKGROUND

• Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, Flanders AE, Gaspar LE, Schell MC, Werner-Wasik M, Demas W, Ryu J, Bahary JP, Souhami L, Rotman M, Mehta MP, Curran WJ Jr. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1665-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16250-8.

  PMID: 15158627 BACKGROUND

• Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR, Allen PK, Lang FF, Kornguth DG, Arbuckle RB, Swint JM, Shiu AS, Maor MH, Meyers CA. Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1037-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70263-3. Epub 2009 Oct 2.

  PMID: 19801201 BACKGROUND

• Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, Villa S, Fauchon F, Baumert BG, Fariselli L, Tzuk-Shina T, Kortmann RD, Carrie C, Ben Hassel M, Kouri M, Valeinis E, van den Berge D, Collette S, Collette L, Mueller RP. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952-26001 study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 10;29(2):134-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1655. Epub 2010 Nov 1.

  PMID: 21041710 BACKGROUND

• Sahgal A. Point/Counterpoint: Stereotactic radiosurgery without whole-brain radiation for patients with a limited number of brain metastases: the current standard of care? Neuro Oncol. 2015 Jul;17(7):916-8. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov087. No abstract available.

  PMID: 26092877 BACKGROUND

• Patel TR, McHugh BJ, Bi WL, Minja FJ, Knisely JP, Chiang VL. A comprehensive review of MR imaging changes following radiosurgery to 500 brain metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(10):1885-92. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2668. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

  PMID: 21920854 BACKGROUND

• Ross DA, Sandler HM, Balter JM, Hayman JA, Archer PG, Auer DL. Imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery of primary and secondary malignant brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2002 Jan;56(2):175-81. doi: 10.1023/a:1014571900854.

  PMID: 11995819 BACKGROUND

• Walker AJ, Ruzevick J, Malayeri AA, Rigamonti D, Lim M, Redmond KJ, Kleinberg L. Postradiation imaging changes in the CNS: how can we differentiate between treatment effect and disease progression? Future Oncol. 2014 May;10(7):1277-97. doi: 10.2217/fon.13.271.

  PMID: 24947265 BACKGROUND

• Kohutek ZA, Yamada Y, Chan TA, Brennan CW, Tabar V, Gutin PH, Yang TJ, Rosenblum MK, Ballangrud A, Young RJ, Zhang Z, Beal K. Long-term risk of radionecrosis and imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. J Neurooncol. 2015 Oct;125(1):149-56. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1881-3. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

  PMID: 26307446 BACKGROUND

• Sneed PK, Mendez J, Vemer-van den Hoek JG, Seymour ZA, Ma L, Molinaro AM, Fogh SE, Nakamura JL, McDermott MW. Adverse radiation effect after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: incidence, time course, and risk factors. J Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;123(2):373-86. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS141610. Epub 2015 May 15.

  PMID: 25978710 BACKGROUND

• Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, Barani IJ, Barboriak DP, Baumert BG, Bendszus M, Brown PD, Camidge DR, Chang SM, Dancey J, de Vries EG, Gaspar LE, Harris GJ, Hodi FS, Kalkanis SN, Linskey ME, Macdonald DR, Margolin K, Mehta MP, Schiff D, Soffietti R, Suh JH, van den Bent MJ, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY; Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):e270-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70057-4. Epub 2015 May 27.

  PMID: 26065612 BACKGROUND

• O'Brien BJ, Colen RR. Post-treatment imaging changes in primary brain tumors. Curr Oncol Rep. 2014;16(8):397. doi: 10.1007/s11912-014-0397-x.

  PMID: 24997979 BACKGROUND

• Linhares P, Carvalho B, Figueiredo R, Reis RM, Vaz R. Early Pseudoprogression following Chemoradiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients: The Value of RANO Evaluation. J Oncol. 2013;2013:690585. doi: 10.1155/2013/690585. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

  PMID: 24000284 BACKGROUND

• Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Blatt V, Pession A, Tallini G, Bertorelle R, Bartolini S, Calbucci F, Andreoli A, Frezza G, Leonardi M, Spagnolli F, Ermani M. MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2192-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8163.

  PMID: 18445844 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Nervous System Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases

Study Officials

• Michal Guindy, MD

  Assuta Medical Center

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Michal Guindy, MD

CONTACT

972-50-8800102; micahlgu@assuta.co.il

Judith Luckman, MD

CONTACT

972-54-4858197; judithl@assuta.co.il

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NON RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
• Intervention Model: SINGLE GROUP
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Medical Director of Imaging Services

Model Details: to use the combined data obtained by PET-MRI scanning regarding amino acid metabolic profile, functional and morphological details in order to: 1. Distinguish between progressive tumor and treatment related effects 2. To identify pseudoresponse to antiangiogenic therapy from tumor progression 3. To optimize the study protocol of PET-MRI for future routine clinical application.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 20, 2017
• First Posted: March 3, 2017
• Study Start: March 1, 2017
• Primary Completion: December 31, 2017
• Study Completion: December 31, 2018
• Last Updated: March 21, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

IL (1)