NCT03067142

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to identify unique urine protein markers of Primary Hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) compared to healthy controls. Urine protein markers can be identified by "proteomic" analyses in which proteins are processed in a lab to break them down into smaller building blocks. Using analytical chemistry techniques and specialized equipment many proteins can be identified and measured. Most proteins are found in healthy living cells while subtle changes in these proteins or the presence of different markers reflect abnormal processes and patterns of disease. When identified in disease, protein biomarkers can help to determine if a disease responds to new types of therapies. In this study, changes in urine proteomic patterns over time, their association with change in estimated (calculated) kidney filtering function, and the relative risk for progression of PH1 will be determined. Additionally, as part of the study, the investigators will measure urinary proteins and peptides that are markers of kidney tissue protection (for healthy healing of the kidneys from ongoing damage from high urine oxalate levels, oxalate crystals and stones) to establish if and when these markers are prospectively decreased in PH1 urine. Longitudinal studies of urine "proteomics" may assist in identifying the mechanisms behind PH1-related progression of kidney failure and might contribute important information towards future identification and development of effective therapies to slow or prevent kidney failure in PH1.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
93

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 5, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 9, 2017

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 1, 2017

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 12, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

February 9, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 10, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Phase 1: Urine proteomic markers.

    (1) Quantitative Mass Spectrometry analyses will be completed on previously collected, de-identified, and archived urine specimens (collected at only one time point) from patients with Primary Hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) and from healthy controls to determine unique protein markers in the urine of PH1 patients, taking into account archived data collected about: (a) known genetic PH1 mutations; (b) concomitant estimated kidney filtering function; (c) urine and plasma oxalate concentrations (using the measure of plasma oxalate when kidney function is low) (d) the level of kidney function (called a "stage"); and (e) any medications and supplements \& their dose and frequency taken for differences in disease (PH1) versus a healthy state. To accomplish this, urine specimens and data which were previously collected, de-identified, and archived will be provided by Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) and Ann \& Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago (Chicago, IL).

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Phase 2: Urine proteomic marker patterns and their change over time related to progression of chronic kidney disease in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1).

    5 years

  • Phase 2: Establish by urine proteome pattern changes if & when normal healing processes of the kidneys are lost, which reflect progressive kidney damage.

    5 years

Study Arms (3)

Cohort 1 (Phase 1): PH1

Cross-Sectional/Observational

Other: Observational

Cohort 2 (Phase 1): Controls

Cross-Sectional/Observational

Other: Observational

Cohort 3 (Phase 2): PH1

Longitudinal/Observational

Other: Observational

Interventions

Not an interventional study. Analyses of previously collected urine specimens and data on estimated kidney filtering function.

Cohort 1 (Phase 1): PH1Cohort 2 (Phase 1): ControlsCohort 3 (Phase 2): PH1

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

1. Patients with Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 (PH1) OR 2. Healthy siblings of those PH1 patients (to serve as "controls)

You may qualify if:

  • Have a previously collected 24 hour urine sample from the Mayo Clinic's Rare Kidney Stone Consortium (RKSC) biobank or previously stored at Lurie Children's Hospital (Chicago, IL), a portion of which has been archived (frozen) for future research because you are a patient who has been diagnosed with Primary Hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) that is documented by one of the following: (1) PH1 mutation confirmed and/or (2) liver biopsy confirmed; OR
  • Have a previously collected 24 hour urine sample, a portion of which has been archived (frozen) for future research, because you are a healthy sibling of a PH1 patient, as described above.

You may not qualify if:

  • Have a previously collected 24 hour urine sample because you are a hyperoxaluric patient due to other causes (including secondary hyperoxaluria);
  • Have PH1 and have had a 24 hour sample collected but a portion of that specimen has not been archived (frozen) for future research;
  • Do not have PH1.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Lapolla A, Seraglia R, Molin L, Williams K, Cosma C, Reitano R, Sechi A, Ragazzi E, Traldi P. Low molecular weight proteins in urines from healthy subjects as well as diabetic, nephropathic and diabetic-nephropathic patients: a MALDI study. J Mass Spectrom. 2009 Mar;44(3):419-25. doi: 10.1002/jms.1520.

    PMID: 19165811BACKGROUND
  • Metzger J, Kirsch T, Schiffer E, Ulger P, Mentes E, Brand K, Weissinger EM, Haubitz M, Mischak H, Herget-Rosenthal S. Urinary excretion of twenty peptides forms an early and accurate diagnostic pattern of acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2010 Dec;78(12):1252-62. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.322. Epub 2010 Sep 8.

    PMID: 20827258BACKGROUND
  • Kistler AD, Serra AL, Siwy J, Poster D, Krauer F, Torres VE, Mrug M, Grantham JJ, Bae KT, Bost JE, Mullen W, Wuthrich RP, Mischak H, Chapman AB. Urinary proteomic biomarkers for diagnosis and risk stratification of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a multicentric study. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053016. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

    PMID: 23326375BACKGROUND
  • Evan AP, Coe FL, Lingeman JE, Shao Y, Sommer AJ, Bledsoe SB, Anderson JC, Worcester EM. Mechanism of formation of human calcium oxalate renal stones on Randall's plaque. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2007 Oct;290(10):1315-23. doi: 10.1002/ar.20580.

    PMID: 17724713BACKGROUND
  • Yasui T, Fujita K, Hayashi Y, Ueda K, Kon S, Maeda M, Uede T, Kohri K. Quantification of osteopontin in the urine of healthy and stone-forming men. Urol Res. 1999 Aug;27(4):225-30. doi: 10.1007/s002400050114.

    PMID: 10460890BACKGROUND
  • Zhang Y, Wen Z, Washburn MP, Florens L. Refinements to label free proteome quantitation: how to deal with peptides shared by multiple proteins. Anal Chem. 2010 Mar 15;82(6):2272-81. doi: 10.1021/ac9023999.

    PMID: 20166708BACKGROUND
  • Pieper R. Preparation of urine samples for proteomic analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;425:89-99. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-210-0_8.

    PMID: 18369889BACKGROUND
  • McIlwain S, Mathews M, Bereman MS, Rubel EW, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. Estimating relative abundances of proteins from shotgun proteomics data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Nov 19;13:308. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-308.

    PMID: 23164367BACKGROUND
  • Skates SJ, Gillette MA, LaBaer J, Carr SA, Anderson L, Liebler DC, Ransohoff D, Rifai N, Kondratovich M, Tezak Z, Mansfield E, Oberg AL, Wright I, Barnes G, Gail M, Mesri M, Kinsinger CR, Rodriguez H, Boja ES. Statistical design for biospecimen cohort size in proteomics-based biomarker discovery and verification studies. J Proteome Res. 2013 Dec 6;12(12):5383-94. doi: 10.1021/pr400132j. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

    PMID: 24063748BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1

Interventions

Watchful Waiting

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Outcome Assessment, Health CareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Craig B Langman, MD

    Ann & Robert H Lurie hildren's Hospital of Chicago, Division of Kidney Diseases

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2017

First Posted

March 1, 2017

Study Start

January 5, 2017

Primary Completion

March 30, 2019

Study Completion

May 31, 2019

Last Updated

June 12, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06