NCT03061175

Brief Summary

This pilot randomized clinical trial studies how well a web-based decision aid works in improving informed decisions in patients with stage 0-IIIA breast cancer considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). A web-based decision aid (DA) may help doctors determine how patients make decisions about whether or not to have contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
94

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 24, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2017

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 11, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 11, 2018

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 20, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 20, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

February 13, 2017

Results QC Date

September 10, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 16, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Knowledge Assessed by Surveys for CPM-DA Participants vs. UC Participants

    CPM knowledge is a 10-item multiple-choice measure developed by author Kirsten and Smith. Scores range from 0-100% correct with a higher score equaling more correct knowledge items. Items assessed understanding of the definition of CPM, surgical recovery time and risks/side effects, whether or not CPM improves survival, and whether CPM reduced the risk for disease progression. Will characterize the data using standard methods (estimated marginal means, standard errors, and Cohen's d effect sizes) separately by study arm. At follow-up scores will be reported as the difference between the knowledge score at two time points- the baseline knowledge score and follow-up knowledge score for both the CPM-DA arm and the UC arm.

    2-4 week follow up

  • Preparedness to Make the Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decisions as Assessed by Surveys

    Preparedness for the CPM decision was assessed using a 16-item scale adapted from the Ottawa Preparation for Decision Making scale modified to address the CPM decision. Items evaluated the amount of and satisfaction with information about CPM. Scores were reported as a mean across the items and ranged from 1-4 with 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2= Moderately Disagree; 3 = Moderately Agree; 4= Strongly Agree Higher scores = more prepared. Outcomes reported as estimated marginal means, standard errors, and effect size measures for usual care and B-Sure decision aid conditions.

    2-4 week follow up

  • Decisional Conflict Assessed by the Decisional Conflict Scale

    The Ottawa Decisional Conflict scale has 16 items and five subscales: support for the decision, uncertainty about the decision, level of relevant information, clarity of relevant values, and effective decision. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0= Strongly Disagree to 4 = Strongly Agree). Scores for the five subscales were calculated by an average that was multiplied by 25, which is recommended by the scale's developers. Thus, scores can range from 0 (no decision conflict) to 100 (high decision conflict). Higher scores indicate more decisional conflict.

    2-4 week follow up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Self-Efficacy at 2-4 Week Follow up Survey

    2-4 week follow up

  • Cancer Worry Assessed by 2-4 Week Follow-up Surveys

    2-4 week follow-up

  • CPM Motivations Assessed by Surveys

    2-4 week follow up

  • Perceived Risk of Recurrence Assessed by 2 Items on Surveys

    2-4 week follow-up

Other Outcomes (2)

  • User Interface Satisfaction Survey

    2-4 week follow up

  • B-Sure Use- Time

    2-4 week follow up

Study Arms (2)

Arm I (Web-Based Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy CPM-DA)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive a website address, a secure username and password, and instructions for using the web-based Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM)- Decision Aid (DA).

Other: Internet-Based InterventionOther: Survey Administration

Arm II (Usual Care)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients undergo usual care available to patients considering CPM and receive information from a medical oncologist about CPM.

Other: Survey Administration

Interventions

Receive web-based CPM-DA

Arm I (Web-Based Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy CPM-DA)

Ancillary studies

Arm I (Web-Based Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy CPM-DA)Arm II (Usual Care)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • PHASE I: Has a first, primary diagnosis of unilateral stage 0, 1, 2, or 3a breast cancer (patients with bilateral breast cancer will be excluded from participation)
  • PHASE I: Speaks and reads English
  • PHASE I: Women with sporadic cancers (WSC) (does not have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome \[BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) carrier, strong family history\]); if there is any uncertainty, the surgeon will use the Tyrer-Cuzick (Tyrer et al., 2004) risk model to calculate risk; the Tyrer-Cuzick model calculates a personal lifetime risk of breast cancer based on multiple factors; it has become the standard model because it incorporates not only factors such as estrogen exposure and first degree relatives, but also second degree relatives and paternal lineage; a lifetime risk of 20% or greater is considered high risk and would necessitate increased screening methods to the traditional annual mammogram; for this study, anyone with a lifetime risk up to 19% on the Tyrer-Cuzick model will be considered average risk for breast cancer; anyone with a lifetime risk of 20% or greater will be excluded from participation
  • PHASE I: Able to provide meaningful informed consent
  • PHASE II: Completed initial surgical consult with breast cancer surgeon at Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ)/Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)/Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and is considering CPM, regardless of the surgical treatment of their primary breast cancer (lumpectomy/mastectomy)
  • PHASE II: Has home internet access
  • PHASE II: Has a first, primary diagnosis of unilateral stage 0, 1, 2, or 3a breast cancer
  • PHASE II: Speaks and reads English
  • PHASE II: WSC (does not have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome \[BRCA carrier, strong family history\]); if there is any uncertainty, the surgeon will use the Tyrer-Cuzick (Tyrer et al., 2004) risk model to calculate risk; for this study, anyone with a lifetime risk up to 19% on the Tyrer-Cuzick model will be considered average risk for breast cancer; anyone with a lifetime risk of 20% or greater will be excluded from participation
  • PHASE II: Able to provide meaningful informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129, United States

Location

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, United States

Location

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, 10065, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Carcinoma In SituBreast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carcinoma in SituCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Future studies would benefit from a larger randomized trial including more minorities, lower education \& income, \& patients seen in community-based settings

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Sharon Manne, Associate Director, Population Science
Organization
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Study Officials

  • Sharon Manne

    Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2017

First Posted

February 23, 2017

Study Start

September 24, 2015

Primary Completion

April 11, 2018

Study Completion

April 11, 2018

Last Updated

April 20, 2021

Results First Posted

July 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2021-04

Locations