Web-Based Decision Aid in Improving Informed Decisions in Patients With Stage 0-IIIA Breast Cancer Considering Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Facilitating Informed Decisions for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
5 other identifiers
interventional
94
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This pilot randomized clinical trial studies how well a web-based decision aid works in improving informed decisions in patients with stage 0-IIIA breast cancer considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). A web-based decision aid (DA) may help doctors determine how patients make decisions about whether or not to have contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 11, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 20, 2020
CompletedApril 20, 2021
April 1, 2021
2.5 years
February 13, 2017
September 10, 2019
April 16, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Knowledge Assessed by Surveys for CPM-DA Participants vs. UC Participants
CPM knowledge is a 10-item multiple-choice measure developed by author Kirsten and Smith. Scores range from 0-100% correct with a higher score equaling more correct knowledge items. Items assessed understanding of the definition of CPM, surgical recovery time and risks/side effects, whether or not CPM improves survival, and whether CPM reduced the risk for disease progression. Will characterize the data using standard methods (estimated marginal means, standard errors, and Cohen's d effect sizes) separately by study arm. At follow-up scores will be reported as the difference between the knowledge score at two time points- the baseline knowledge score and follow-up knowledge score for both the CPM-DA arm and the UC arm.
2-4 week follow up
Preparedness to Make the Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decisions as Assessed by Surveys
Preparedness for the CPM decision was assessed using a 16-item scale adapted from the Ottawa Preparation for Decision Making scale modified to address the CPM decision. Items evaluated the amount of and satisfaction with information about CPM. Scores were reported as a mean across the items and ranged from 1-4 with 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2= Moderately Disagree; 3 = Moderately Agree; 4= Strongly Agree Higher scores = more prepared. Outcomes reported as estimated marginal means, standard errors, and effect size measures for usual care and B-Sure decision aid conditions.
2-4 week follow up
Decisional Conflict Assessed by the Decisional Conflict Scale
The Ottawa Decisional Conflict scale has 16 items and five subscales: support for the decision, uncertainty about the decision, level of relevant information, clarity of relevant values, and effective decision. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0= Strongly Disagree to 4 = Strongly Agree). Scores for the five subscales were calculated by an average that was multiplied by 25, which is recommended by the scale's developers. Thus, scores can range from 0 (no decision conflict) to 100 (high decision conflict). Higher scores indicate more decisional conflict.
2-4 week follow up
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Self-Efficacy at 2-4 Week Follow up Survey
2-4 week follow up
Cancer Worry Assessed by 2-4 Week Follow-up Surveys
2-4 week follow-up
CPM Motivations Assessed by Surveys
2-4 week follow up
Perceived Risk of Recurrence Assessed by 2 Items on Surveys
2-4 week follow-up
Other Outcomes (2)
User Interface Satisfaction Survey
2-4 week follow up
B-Sure Use- Time
2-4 week follow up
Study Arms (2)
Arm I (Web-Based Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy CPM-DA)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive a website address, a secure username and password, and instructions for using the web-based Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM)- Decision Aid (DA).
Arm II (Usual Care)
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergo usual care available to patients considering CPM and receive information from a medical oncologist about CPM.
Interventions
Receive web-based CPM-DA
Ancillary studies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PHASE I: Has a first, primary diagnosis of unilateral stage 0, 1, 2, or 3a breast cancer (patients with bilateral breast cancer will be excluded from participation)
- PHASE I: Speaks and reads English
- PHASE I: Women with sporadic cancers (WSC) (does not have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome \[BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) carrier, strong family history\]); if there is any uncertainty, the surgeon will use the Tyrer-Cuzick (Tyrer et al., 2004) risk model to calculate risk; the Tyrer-Cuzick model calculates a personal lifetime risk of breast cancer based on multiple factors; it has become the standard model because it incorporates not only factors such as estrogen exposure and first degree relatives, but also second degree relatives and paternal lineage; a lifetime risk of 20% or greater is considered high risk and would necessitate increased screening methods to the traditional annual mammogram; for this study, anyone with a lifetime risk up to 19% on the Tyrer-Cuzick model will be considered average risk for breast cancer; anyone with a lifetime risk of 20% or greater will be excluded from participation
- PHASE I: Able to provide meaningful informed consent
- PHASE II: Completed initial surgical consult with breast cancer surgeon at Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ)/Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)/Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and is considering CPM, regardless of the surgical treatment of their primary breast cancer (lumpectomy/mastectomy)
- PHASE II: Has home internet access
- PHASE II: Has a first, primary diagnosis of unilateral stage 0, 1, 2, or 3a breast cancer
- PHASE II: Speaks and reads English
- PHASE II: WSC (does not have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome \[BRCA carrier, strong family history\]); if there is any uncertainty, the surgeon will use the Tyrer-Cuzick (Tyrer et al., 2004) risk model to calculate risk; for this study, anyone with a lifetime risk up to 19% on the Tyrer-Cuzick model will be considered average risk for breast cancer; anyone with a lifetime risk of 20% or greater will be excluded from participation
- PHASE II: Able to provide meaningful informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129, United States
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Future studies would benefit from a larger randomized trial including more minorities, lower education \& income, \& patients seen in community-based settings
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sharon Manne, Associate Director, Population Science
- Organization
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sharon Manne
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2017
First Posted
February 23, 2017
Study Start
September 24, 2015
Primary Completion
April 11, 2018
Study Completion
April 11, 2018
Last Updated
April 20, 2021
Results First Posted
July 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-04