The Effect of Three Prosthesis Designs in Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
216
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare three prosthesis designs to compare three prosthesis designs for total knee arthroplasty and determine the best option for patients in need of a knee replacement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedApril 20, 2017
February 1, 2017
6.8 years
February 16, 2017
April 19, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)
KOOS is a knee-specific questionnaire developed to evaluate short- and long-term symptoms and functioning in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. KOOS is validated for use in total knee arthroplasty and has been shown to be a valid, reliable and responsive measure. KOOS is a patient-administered questionnaire.
Pre-operative, 1, 2 and 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Oxford knee score (OKS)
Pre-operative, 1, 2 and 5 years
EQ-5D-5L
Pre-operative, 1, 2 and 5 years
Range of motion (ROM)
Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3, 12, 24 and 60 months
Kinematic radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
After 12 months
Plain anterior posterior radiographs and hip, knee and ankle (HKA) radiographs
Pre-operative, 3, 12, 24 and 60 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Knee arthroplasty, Cruciate retaining
ACTIVE COMPARATORTotal knee replacement with preserved posterior cruciate ligament and a cruciate retaining insert.
Knee arthroplasty, Anterior stabilized
ACTIVE COMPARATORTotal knee replacement with sacrificed posterior cruciate ligament and an anterior stabilized insert.
Knee arthroplasty, Posterior stabilized
ACTIVE COMPARATORTotal knee replacement with sacrificed posterior cruciate ligament and a posterior stabilized design.
Interventions
Legion total knee arthroplasty implant component, Smith \& Nephew, Cruciate Retaining design
Legion total knee arthroplasty implant component, Smith \& Nephew, Anterior Stabilized design
Legion total knee arthroplasty implant component, Smith \& Nephew, Posterior Stabilized design
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary osteoarthritis
- Non-fixed or fixed varus or valgus deformity less than 15º measured on preoperative standing hip-knee-ankle (HKA) radiographs
- Intact PCL (assessed preoperatively and verified during surgery)
- Age 45 - 75 years (only patients 45 - 70 years will be included in the kinematic RSA)
- Body mass index ≤ 35 kg/m2
- ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score I or II
- Only patients with KOOS scores above 80 on the Symptoms, ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and Pain subscales will be included in the kinematic analysis
You may not qualify if:
- Prior ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) surgery
- Impaired collateral ligaments
- Secondary osteoarthritis of the knee
- Previous osteotomy
- Rheumatic disease
- Flexion less than 90 degrees
- Flexion contracture over 10 degrees
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Malignancy
- Patients who do not speak Norwegian
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospitallead
- Haugesund Rheumatism Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Haugesund Rheumatism Hospital
Haugesund, 5528, Norway
Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital
Oslo, 0446, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arild Aamodt, MD, PhD
Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2017
First Posted
February 23, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
April 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share