Study Stopped
Study was abandoned.
Medicated Aerosol Delivery Using A Jet Nebulizer Versus A Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer in COPD Exacerbation
A Pilot Study of Medicated Aerosol Delivery Using A Jet Nebulizer Versus A Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer in COPD Exacerbation
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Delivery of inhaled short-acting bronchodilators (SABD) is standard of care in the emergency department (ED) for exacerbation of COPD, the goal of such being rapid reversal of airflow obstruction. However, current guidelines for the delivery of SABDs in spontaneously breathing patients make no distinction whether these medications should be delivered via metered dose inhaler (MDI) or jet nebulizer (JN), the specific medication delivery device having no significant effect on hospital admission or reversal of flow obstruction. However, advancements in nebulizer design, namely FDA-approved vibrating mesh technology, have demonstrated significant improvements relative to JNs and metered dose inhalers in efficiency and amount of drug delivered in in vivo and in vitro studies. Currently there are no clinical trials comparing the use of vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) to JNs and their effect on clinically important outcomes. This prospective randomized controlled pilot trial seeks to determine if there are differences in hospital admission due to COPD when a vibrating mesh nebulizer is used versus a jet nebulizer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 27, 2021
October 1, 2021
1 year
January 30, 2017
October 19, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hospitalization rate
hospitalization rate among COPD exacerbation patients in the ED receiving SABD via jet nebulizer versus those receiving SABD via VMN
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
ICU admission
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Hospital length of stay
through study completion (approx 1 year)
NIV in escalation of respiratory support
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Duration of NIV support
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Intubation in escalation of respiratory support
through study completion (approx 1 year)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Jet nebulizer
ACTIVE COMPARATORshort-acting bronchodilator (albuterol and/or ipratropium bromide) according to standard of care practices and physician discretion will be administered with a jet nebulizer
Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer
ACTIVE COMPARATORshort-acting bronchodilator (albuterol and/or ipratropium bromide) according to standard of care practices and physician discretion will be administered with a vibrating mesh nebulizer
Interventions
short-acting bronchodilator medication delivered with a vibrating mesh nebulizer via mouthpiece, valved facemask or non-invasive ventilation mask
short-acting bronchodilator medication delivered with a jet nebulizer via mouthpiece, valved facemask or non-invasive ventilation mask
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- i. Patients ordered to receive short-acting bronchodilator therapy ii. Patients ≥ 40 years of age iii. Patients with a self-reported history of COPD and/or patients with diagnosed/suspected COPD iv. Patients whose FEV1 is ≤ 50% of predicted or are unable to perform FEV1 maneuver because of airflow-associated respiratory distress or NIV use
You may not qualify if:
- i. Patients whose indication for SABD therapy is for a clinical indication other than COPD ii. The immediate need for intubation iii. Pregnant women iv. Non-English speakers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric J Kriner, RRT
Medstar Health Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2017
First Posted
February 14, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
April 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share