Reliability of Fluorescent Camera and Caries Detection Dye Versus the Visual Tactile Method
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.Three dentinal carious lesions will be chosen in this study and will be in the same patient.
- 2.Using local anaesthesia and rubber dam, the operative field will disinfected with 1% hypochlorite, and the dentine lesions should be exposed with a high-speed diamond bur by removing covering enamel.
- 3.Before the excavation dentine samples are collected for baseline bacteriological assessment .
- 4.Excavation will be carried out using new slow speed round burs and hand excavators.
- 5.The excavation end point of one cavity will be determined using visual tactile method. The two other cavities will be inspected with fluorescent camera or caries detector dye (CDD) methods to determine excavation endpoint respectively.
- 6.After excavation, dentine samples from the three cavities will be collected using a sterile excavator for the bacteriological assessment.
- 7.Number of visits \& follow up period: all procedures will be done at the same visit and there is no follow up period. Direct benefit of the research to the human volunteer: to determine the excavation endpoint to ensure complete caries removal and prevent it's recurrence in the future. Scientific value and social benefits: to reach the best method to determine the excavation endpoint. Expected risk to the human subjects: the ordinary side effects associated with any restorative treatment and no of the study variable has side effect on the patient and in case of any side effect due to the restorative treatment, the participant will directly contact the operator.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2018
CompletedFebruary 13, 2017
February 1, 2017
1.1 years
February 3, 2017
February 10, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
bacterial count
will be done by Digital colony counter, Agar diffusion test
an average of 1 year
Study Arms (3)
visual tactile assessment
ACTIVE COMPARATORdentine sample collection and then bacterial count by Digital colony counter, Agar diffusion test after visual tactile assessment.
caries detector dye
ACTIVE COMPARATORdentine sample collection and then bacterial count by Digital colony counter, Agar diffusion test after after using caries detector dye to determine the excavation endpoint.
fluorescent camera
EXPERIMENTALdentine sample collection and then bacterial count by Digital colony counter, Agar diffusion test after after using fluorescent camera to determine the excavation endpoint.
Interventions
used too detect residual caries depending on the bacterial byproducts.
method usually used to detect the residual caries.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with at least three carious lesions .
- Males or Females.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Co-operative patients approving the trial.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy.
- Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
- Heavy smoking.
- Xerostomia.
- Lack of compliance.
- Evidence of temporomandibular joint disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Mohamed Mohamed sabry Mohamed
Cairo, Nasr City, 11311, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Stoll R, Urban-Klein B, Giacomin P, Loukas A, Jablonski-Momeni A. In vivo assessment of caries excavation with a fluorescence camera compared to direct bacteriological sampling and quantitative analysis using flow cytometry. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):843-9. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1459-2. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
PMID: 24142047BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
mohamed riad farid, PHD
Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Cairo university
- STUDY CHAIR
Rasha Ra'faat Abdel Aziz, PHD
Lecturer of Conservative Dentistry, Cairo university
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The side to which interventions or control is assigned to will be recorded and all records of all patients will be kept with the main supervisor . The operator will not be blinded as the difference in application protocol of the restorative materials prohibited blinding of the operator; however, the patient, Statisticians and Outcome assessors will be blinded to the material assignment
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident at conservative department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2017
First Posted
February 13, 2017
Study Start
February 3, 2017
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
publishing the data at egyptian dental journal