Oxytocin, Alcohol Craving, and Intimate Partner Aggression
Effects of Oxytocin on Alcohol Craving and Intimate Partner Aggression
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Alcohol use disorders (AUD) and intimate partner aggression (IPA) frequently co-occur. There are significant health and economic burdens associated with AUD and co-occurring IPA, and little empirical data to guide treatment efforts. The neuropeptide oxytocin may help mitigate both AUD and IPA. However, clinical data examining oxytocin's effects on human aggression is scant. The proposed study is designed to address these gaps in the literature by utilizing a human laboratory paradigm to test the effects of oxytocin on craving and aggression among couples with AUD and co-occurring IPA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 11, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 11, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 9, 2022
CompletedMay 9, 2022
May 1, 2022
3.8 years
February 3, 2017
February 16, 2022
May 5, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Alcohol Craving
Change in subjective alcohol craving as measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between time point 3 (before the alcohol cue) and 4 (after the alcohol cue). Participants completed the VAS at 8 timepoints: Minute 0 (pre-OT/placebo) (Time 1) Minute 5 (pre-OT/placebo) (Time 2) OT/placebo administered at minute 10 Minute 40 (Time 3) Minute 45 - alcohol cue paradigm began Time 4 (immediately after alcohol cue) Minute 65 - TAP began Time 5 (immediately after TAP began) Time 6 (15 minutes after TAP) Time 7 (30 minutes after TAP) Time 8 (60 minutes after TAP) This 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was anchored on a 100mm Likert-type scale from 0 (not at all/no craving) to 10 (extremely/maximum carving). The scale is set to 100mm in length, and the lowest value is a 0 (zero), representing no craving and and highest value is a 10 (ten) representing extreme craving.
Participants completed the VAS at 8 timepoints. Outcome measure represents the change in VAS scores between time point 3 (before the alcohol cue) and 4 (after the alcohol cue).
Laboratory Intimate Partner Aggression Intensity (IPA)
Intensity of laboratory-based IPA was assessed using the Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP). IPA intensity is operationalized as the volume of "shock" administered on a 1-10 (1 is least intense, 10 is most intense) scale using the computer based paradigm in response to "losing" trials. TAP is a fictitious reaction time competition among partners. Participants are told that a winning trial required them to deliver a shock to their partner that ranged from 1 to 10 intensity for a duration of their choosing. A losing trial resulted in them receiving a shock from their partner (administered through two electrodes attached to the index and middle fingers of the nondominant hand). In reality, all participants received an identical sequence of "winning" or "losing" trials (and corresponding shocks) generated by the TAP software. IPA was operationalized as the average intensity (volume) and duration of shocks administered in response to "losing" trials.
10 minutes from start to end of TAP
Laboratory Intimate Partner Aggression (IPA) Duration
Laboratory IPA Duration was measured by the length of time participants administered "shocks" in the Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP). Measured in milliseconds. Greater number of milliseconds represents a longer shock. TAP is a fictitious reaction time competition among partners. Participants are told that a winning trial required them to deliver a shock to their partner that ranged from 1 to 10 intensity for a duration of their choosing. A losing trial resulted in them receiving a shock from their partner (administered through two electrodes attached to the index and middle fingers of the nondominant hand). In reality, all participants received an identical sequence of "winning" or "losing" trials (and corresponding shocks) generated by the TAP software. IPA was operationalized as the average intensity (volume) and duration of shocks administered in response to "losing" trials.
10 minutes from start to end of TAP
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Cortisol
Measured between Time 4 (before the laboratory aggression paradigm) and Time 5 (after the laboratory aggression paradigm).
Change in Subjective Aggression
Change is aggression measured between time point 4 (after the alcohol cue) and 5 (during Taylor Aggression Paradigm).
Study Arms (2)
Oxytocin
EXPERIMENTALEach participant will self-administer 40 international units (IU) intranasal Oxytocin
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATOREach participant will self-administer matching saline placebo
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 18 or over
- fluent in English
- endorse at least one instance of mild or moderate physical IPA with their partner in the past 6 months as defined by the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS-2)
- both partners must be willing to participate
- one or both partners must meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) criteria for an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Concurrent substance use disorders (e.g., marijuana) is acceptable provided alcohol is the participant's primary substance of choice.
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy or breastfeeding
- current or history of psychiatric or medical condition that could interfere with neuroendocrine function (e.g., hematological, endocrine, renal, or pulmonary disease; synthetic glucocorticoid or exogenous steroid therapy; psychotic, bipolar, eating disorders)
- Body Max Index (BMI) ≥ 39
- current suicidal ideation and intent
- severe physical or sexual IPA in the past six months as defined by the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS-2)
- initiation of psychotropic medication in the past 4 weeks
- acute alcohol withdrawal as indicated by a score of 8 or greater on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale (CIWA-Ar).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Related Publications (2)
Forkus SR, Baer MM, Giff ST, Hall E, Miles SR, Flanagan JC. The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on posttraumatic stress symptoms and alcohol use problems among individuals experiencing intimate partner violence. Psychol Trauma. 2025 Oct 23. doi: 10.1037/tra0002057. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41129363DERIVEDFlanagan JC, Nietert PJ, McCrady BS, Sellers S, Yates-Johnson A, Giff ST, Forkus SR. Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Efficacy of Intranasal Oxytocin to Enhance Alcohol Behavioral Couple Therapy. J Clin Psychiatry. 2025 May 12;86(2):24m15627. doi: 10.4088/JCP.24m15627.
PMID: 40392716DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Ability to estimate anticipated power was limited by absence of prior studies examining effects of OT on aggression using TAP.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Stacey Sellers
- Organization
- Medical University of South Carolina - Institute of Psychiatry
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julianne C Flanagan, Ph.D.
Medical University of South Carolina
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2017
First Posted
February 8, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 11, 2021
Study Completion
April 11, 2021
Last Updated
May 9, 2022
Results First Posted
May 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share